There is no Core in the middle of the earth

Well we really do not know what lies at the Core, however to assume there is not one is even harder for me to believe. I am open minded to hear your thoughts as to why you believe the way you do.

I have always speculated it to either be iron or crystal.

reply to post by 46ACE
tHATS FUNNY

reply to post by 46ACE


Omfg I just spilled my drink.

That took the words out of my mouth.

I am just trying to share the reality of the situation.Yes,its true,aliens live in the inner earth,and the earth is not flat,its round.

reply to post by brindle


pics or it didn't happen

Originally posted by brindle

Originally posted by ELahrairah

Originally posted by brindle
Why do you think all these craft are seen daily flying into our oceans ?Did you think they are lobster fishing?There are secret doors hidden throughout the [planet which lead to the inner earth.

That is a big leap would it not be easier to assume that they just have bases submerged in the ocean or bodies of water?

Try to think rationally.

Okay:

Originally posted by brindle
These aliens are not amphibians now.

O-RLY? What exactly is this mind numbing conclusion based on?

Originally posted by brindle
If they were to have a base in the water and got out to stretch their legs,they would get eaten by sharks.

Why? Do they taste like "peanut butter snickers bars"?

Originally posted by brindle

They have tremendous homes in the inner earth that make the hefner mansion look like a trailer.

never mind....

reply to post by 46ACE

the earths's magnetic field is direct evidence of a metallic flowing liquid core. (DRUGGGZ "R" BAD MMMM'KAY).... provide one ounce of evidence to any of this raving or turn in your key to the executive washroom and...

So because every human body has a magnetic field we have a metallic flowing liquid core, too?

When there is an earthquake, sensitive seismographs can pick up the vibrations travelling through the Earth. If the earth was hollow then the time taken for a vibration to traverse the hollow space would differ from the results measured.

Then explain why there is a shadow zone for P and S waves?

S-Wave shadow zone

P-Wave shadow zone

Why does this P and S wave theorie require that the rock changes inside the earth so rapid and frequently that they can bend their theory to fit somehow? They make so many assumption as where those P waves might travel that I could also make a diagram where these are all reflections of pockets of magma or whatever so there does not have to be a liquid core. THIS ARE ALL ASSUMPTIONS wich are not proven ...just like the theorie of the hollow earth.

None of you smart folks can proove the TS wrong because both are just theories ...

wow ...didn´t see that the TS already made the next step to inner-earth aliens (not that hollow earth would be enough for one thread ) ...slow down boy and you should at least give a little bit of evidence ...just a little

You know there is another issue I have with the whole hollow earth theory.
A considerable amount of earths mass would be missing if it was hallowed out
and gravity would be much lower then what it is now because there would be less mass(matter) making up earth.
Plus if the earth is hollow what is creating the magnetic field?

Originally posted by AnnoyingOrangeX
reply to post by 46ACE

 

the earths's magnetic field is direct evidence of a metallic flowing liquid core. (DRUGGGZ "R" BAD MMMM'KAY).... provide one ounce of evidence to any of this raving or turn in your key to the executive washroom and...

So because every human body has a magnetic field we have a metallic flowing liquid core, too?

Uh: Every human body has a magnetic field? Really? (oh right we're still on "ATS") we do have electro-chemical biological processes taking place; how much of a detectable field they generate is probably negligible.

Originally posted by AnnoyingOrangeX
When there is an earthquake, sensitive seismographs can pick up the vibrations travelling through the Earth. If the earth was hollow then the time taken for a vibration to traverse the hollow space would differ from the results measured.

Then explain why there is a shadow zone for P and S waves?

S-Wave shadow zone

P-Wave shadow zone

Why does this P and S wave theorie require that the rock changes inside the earth so rapid and frequently that they can bend their theory to fit somehow? They make so many assumption as where those P waves might travel that I could also make a diagram where these are all reflections of pockets of magma or whatever so there does not have to be a liquid core. THIS ARE ALL ASSUMPTIONS wich are not proven ...just like the theorie of the hollow earth.

None of you smart folks can proove the TS wrong because both are just theories ...

wow ...didn´t see that the TS already made the next step to inner-earth aliens (not that hollow earth would be enough for one thread

) ...slow down boy and you should at least give a little bit of evidence ...just a little

edit on 8-7-2011 by AnnoyingOrangeX because: spelling

edit on 8-7-2011 by AnnoyingOrangeX because: (no reason given)

Perhaps you are confusing the Earth, with peaches?
They have pits, and you can eat everything else.

No one has seen the core. But things like magnetic fields, S and P waves.
Mass measurements, our effect on the moon's orbit....All kinds of things point to it's existence.
Besides, why would there not be one? What specifics of accretion formation would point to a coreless planet?

durp.. This thread just made me realize how pathetic my life has become.

Originally posted by spacedoubt
Perhaps you are confusing the Earth, with peaches?
They have pits, and you can eat everything else.

No one has seen the core. But things like magnetic fields, S and P waves.
Mass measurements, our effect on the moon's orbit....All kinds of things point to it's existence.
Besides, why would there not be one? What specifics of accretion formation would point to a coreless planet?

The proof that we can physically see with our own 2 eyes time and time again is aliens driving their craft into oceans and lakes and not resurfacing.They have kept watch in some lakes where alien craft have flown into lakes and not resurfaced.draw your own conclusion as to where the aliens have gone.If you believe they are just hanging out at the bottom of a lake going over old times and playing parcheesi for ten years,you are free to believe that.The evidence shows that they are using highways under the water to traverse into the inner earth.

Originally posted by 46ACE

durp.. This thread just made me realize how pathetic my life has become.

Your life isnt pathetic,you have become a wise man after reading the content of these writings.

There is no core to this thread.

The proof that we can physically see with our own 2 eyes time and time again is aliens driving their craft into oceans and lakes and not resurfacing.

Well if that is your evidence than I am out here...

I sadly never have seen any alien craft

Originally posted by nerbot
There is no core to this thread.

I guees you would have to run some s and p waves through the thread,and then make some half assed hypothesis and put it into science books as fact.

Originally posted by spacedoubt
Perhaps you are confusing the Earth, with peaches?
They have pits, and you can eat everything else.

No one has seen the core. But things like magnetic fields, S and P waves.
Mass measurements, our effect on the moon's orbit....All kinds of things point to it's existence.
Besides, why would there not be one? What specifics of accretion formation would point to a coreless planet?

NONE of these things "point to" there being an iron core to our planet. Since the "scientists" cannot think of any other way for there to be a magnetic field, they came up with this retarded idea of a core that spins slower as the "mantle" full of magma spins faster, thus creating the magnetic field. This very idea is, on the surface of it, so retarded that it's amazing it was ever bought into. However, it has been accepted for so long that rote learners like yourself totally believe it. THERE IS NO PROOF WHATSOEVER OF AN IRON CORE. And as far as the mantle of magma, this is HYPOTHESIZED due to the fact that volcanoes spit out lava. Since when you pop your zits they spit out pus, this PROVES your entire body is made of pus. With a chewy bubblegum center. That makes about as much sense as the Earth's iron core.

Here is just ONE theory that makes more sense than the stuff you are regurgitating.

Accretion formation? Who says that's how it happened? Oh, right, another THEORY. NONE of this stuff is PROVEN one way or another.

Once you yourself go down there and check it out, THEN you can spout off like that. Until then, NO ONE REALLY KNOWS.

Originally posted by CaptChaos

Originally posted by spacedoubt
Perhaps you are confusing the Earth, with peaches?
They have pits, and you can eat everything else.

No one has seen the core. But things like magnetic fields, S and P waves.
Mass measurements, our effect on the moon's orbit....All kinds of things point to it's existence.
Besides, why would there not be one? What specifics of accretion formation would point to a coreless planet?

NONE of these things "point to" there being an iron core to our planet. Since the "scientists" cannot think of any other way for there to be a magnetic field, they came up with this retarded idea of a core that spins slower as the "mantle" full of magma spins faster, thus creating the magnetic field. This very idea is, on the surface of it, so retarded that it's amazing it was ever bought into. However, it has been accepted for so long that rote learners like yourself totally believe it. THERE IS NO PROOF WHATSOEVER OF AN IRON CORE. And as far as the mantle of magma, this is HYPOTHESIZED due to the fact that volcanoes spit out lava. Since when you pop your zits they spit out pus, this PROVES your entire body is made of pus. With a chewy bubblegum center. That makes about as much sense as the Earth's iron core.

Here is just ONE theory that makes more sense than the stuff you are regurgitating.

Accretion formation? Who says that's how it happened? Oh, right, another THEORY. NONE of this stuff is PROVEN one way or another.

Once you yourself go down there and check it out, THEN you can spout off like that. Until then, NO ONE REALLY KNOWS.

Tremendous,you are completely right.The earth having a core is the stupidest theory I have ever heard.They actually have people believing this nonsense.

reply to post by CaptChaos


Perhaps it's full of nitrous oxide.
What's so upsetting about a planet with heavier metals at the center?
I'd also like to see all those vids and pics of alien craft popping in and out that have been mentioned in the thread?
I'd like to see those. I'm sure there are many.
That would be supportive of other, non core theories.

Sounds like Iron deficiency might destroy some other pet theories. Is this the case?