It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions,
Originally posted by starwarsisreal
Good one one but who do you think the group is? Rogue Elements within the United States government?
Originally posted by Yahm16
reply to post by ANOK
Exactally, then the attacks eliminate proof of pay out for the who, what , and when. Win-win.
Butcher23, then what's your theory for flight 93's purpose? Other than misdirection.
The September 11th attacks were likely meant as a cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th. [1] The attacks ... were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas.
"On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency, and for the first time in U.S. history, invoked its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act Section 12(k) easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next 15 days. These changes would allow an estimated $240 billion in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership."
Originally posted by Yahm16
reply to post by hooper
In the Pentagon, as stated in the OP. I don't buy into the OP's theory either, hence the question about flight 93. But, it's always fun to read about other peoples ideas on conspiracies (as long as it's not end of the world stuff). If you listen to some of the older people, they remember when suggesting a second shooter in Dallas was crazy, now it's crazy if you say Oswald acted alone.edit on 29-6-2011 by Yahm16 because: poor spelling habits...
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by TheButcher23
Maybe it's something a little more simple?
The 2.3 trillion financed the 911 attacks?
Originally posted by roboe
reply to post by TheButcher23
I give up.
The $2.3 trillion has been debunked so many times, it's not even funny.
And yet, here it is again. I was under the impression that the motto of ATS was 'Deny ignorance'? To me, it seems like 'Embrace ignorance' is the order of the day.
ETA: If people wish to educate themselves, they can start right here: www.911myths.com...edit on 29-6-2011 by roboe because: (no reason given)