the hole in the pentagon..is the big hole in the 911 story PT. 2

ok if you dont believe that this is a cover up yet youve got to be blind..

firstly lets have a look at the cctv footage of the plane hitting the pentagon
please take notice of the size and length of the ufo entering the right of the screen..

Google Video Link

would you not agree that the head of the plane is roughly 4-5m long x 3m tall

now take a look at an AA Boeing





does the nose of the AA plane look anything like the nose that appears in the video?
the size is simply too different, you would expect to see the begining of the cabin or widening of the fuselage in the cctv footage if it was a large passenger plane..


this video was recently posted by another ATS member and thankyou for sharing it
i would like to post it again because it raises some good points

Google Video Link

there is inconsitence in the key witnesess story, not only that the angle and direction of the plane does not work..
also i would like to stress how much of a task it would be to bank a plane into a very low building at around 500kmh..


ask yourself
why when the pentagon is known as the most protected place in america
are we shown dodgey cctv footage you would expect to see on a hold up video
i imagine they would have full framing cameras that are monitered 24/7..


come on people, open your eyes

reply to post by dilapidated


2nd videos not working.
2nd line

They confiscated like 50+ tapes around the pentagon i think after the incident.

It proves its inside job they never released any except for the worst quality one....

Also there is no way someone can fly the Plane into the Pentagon like that it just doesn't make sense.

The video proof inside the Pentagon is another key. Wouldn't the hallways and offices of the Pentagon itself be watched by video cams? Where are those tapes. The plane or missle or Superman destroyed a large section of the building, surely one of more video cams were taping at the time. Has this been brought up before here, and answered?

Everything the government has ever said is a big hole in the 9/11 story.

Originally posted by Aleister
The video proof inside the Pentagon is another key. Wouldn't the hallways and offices of the Pentagon itself be watched by video cams? Where are those tapes. The plane or missle or Superman destroyed a large section of the building, surely one of more video cams were taping at the time. Has this been brought up before here, and answered?

No- as a matter of fact they're not with the exception of the visitor's waiting area which is on the exact opposite side of the building.

Originally posted by dilapidated
ok if you dont believe that this is a cover up yet youve got to be blind..

firstly lets have a look at the cctv footage of the plane hitting the pentagon
please take notice of the size and length of the ufo entering the right of the screen..

would you not agree that the head of the plane is roughly 4-5m long x 3m tall

No, and I have no idea how you could come up with those dimensions based on *this* video (the first one -since the second didn't work)

does the nose of the AA plane look anything like the nose that appears in the video?

How can you tell what the nose looks like from this? Are you basing it on the computer animation? Man you're stretching for this.

there is inconsitence in the key witnesess story, not only that the angle and direction of the plane does not work..

There's no real inconsistencies of the 100+ witnesses that it was a plane though is there?

ask yourself
why when the pentagon is known as the most protected place in america

Afraid not - Ft Knox is just one example of a better protected site. Same with SAC bases in my experience.

come on people, open your eyes

They were open on the only video you posted that worked and it didn't show me anything to support your claims.

Originally posted by dilapidated
firstly lets have a look at the cctv footage of the plane hitting the pentagon
please take notice of the size and length of the ufo entering the right of the screen..

would you not agree that the head of the plane is roughly 4-5m long x 3m tall

now take a look at an AA Boeing





does the nose of the AA plane look anything like the nose that appears in the video?
the size is simply too different, you would expect to see the begining of the cabin or widening of the fuselage in the cctv footage if it was a large passenger plane..

That could be because the aircraft that hit the Pentagon was a B757, and your looking at photos of B767’s…

Has anyone ever discussed the ability of the thick walls of the building to shear off the wings at their roots and them pinwheel into the hole behind the advancing fuselage?

That concept involves a virtually instant transfer in inertia from one motion to another in microseconds but the interior portion of the wing/engine assembly would be the driving force, the swival point, not the far less lighter outer areas of the wing.

Given the strength of the Pentagon's wall structure, the relatively sharp edge of the hole created by the fuselage and the fact of the swept-back nature of the wing design,we need not necessarily assume the wings simple advanced straight into the wall unaltered from the initial impact but more or less flipped around to follow the fuselage into the interior.

reply to post by Aliensun
Man, you guys are really reaching here. "Pinwheeled into the hole"? Are you for real? Get a life, and quit wasting our time.

Please contribute to the original thread located Here

Thank you

Closing

Semper