It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TETRA.X
reply to post by SL55T0T0
Great post! S&F!!!
One more nail in the NWO coffin.
And it doesn't really matter what the trolls say. Most people believe (worldwide) that 9/11 was an inside job.
Originally posted by Nutter
I didn't mean to be harsh.
Anyway, what I think ata was trying to convey is that Morgan Reynolds seems like he is still working for them if you get my drift. He is a proponent of lazer beams, no-planes, holograms etc. AND he's about the only one who has successfully (successful in humiliating himself and the rest of the truth movement) taken his claims to court.
Think about it.
Originally posted by TETRA.X
reply to post by SL55T0T0
Great post! S&F!!!
One more nail in the NWO coffin.
And it doesn't really matter what the trolls say. Most people believe (worldwide) that 9/11 was an inside job.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by OverMan
"No plane theory" has alot more cred then the official version just as MIHOP trumps LIHOP, at least in my feeble little mind... a mind "conditioned" by thousands of forums posts such as these, perhaps 100's of "9/11 truth" video hours, literally 1000's of related articles and being an observer to the post 9/11 militarization of this nation.
Just interested OverMan, nothing more.
Although I do not buy in any way the official explanation for what happened on 911 and who was responsible for that, I do wonder myself the following about your no plane thoughts here.
How do you explain the clearly visible impact damage in both Towers after the attack?
I mean, if there were indeed no planes used for that attack, what do you think created those [clearly plane looking] damage shapes in the towers then?
Since all the polls you're coming up with have been artfully misrepresented and cherry picked by those damned fool conspiracy web sites you get all your information from, of course we're going to disagree with the results. I personally agree there was a monumental coverup, namely, of gross incompetence and mishandling during the 9/11 attack that borders on the tomfoolery of a Three Stooges flick. An administration that can't even hand out bottles of water to hurricane survivors in New Orleans without slipping on banana peels almost certainly floundered the same way during a major terrorist attack, and the reason why Bush hesitated to testify is blatantly obvious- he knows he's a little boy sent to do a man's job in Washington and he knows he dropped the ball. We keep telling you this, and even your own polls tell you this, but you simply don't want to listen- it's not sinister sounding enough to placate your abject paranoia.
Alright, then why don't you guys find some sources to back that up? If there are polls saying that a good portion of Americans believe that 9/11 was an inside job, then instead of bashing those polls why don't you find some that show that only a "small handful" of us do?
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
No only a small handful of conspiracy theorists believe that.
Originally posted by DeadBirdCitizen
Man, this is great. But my question is, how many credible scientists, eyewitnesses, engineers and government insiders have to come out publicly for the average person who believes the official story to say, WAIT. Stop. Let me re-think what I've been told?
All I know is, this guy brings us one step closer. Great post.
Originally posted by SmokeAndMirror
"...if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."
- George Bush Senior.