It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Your post is thought provoking and admirable star for you. Thanks for all of your opinions, this subject really intrigues me.
Originally posted by czygyny
Yep...I don't know about 'experts' and 'scientists' and their predictions and prognotisticating...but an aged white oak tree stump I happened along some years ago told a tale of cyclic wet and dry years for at least 200 years.
While our area experiences protracted droughts and then ample rain, this stump showed six or seven exeedingly rich, fat rings every half century or so, proving that perhaps what is going on right now is *not* the result of our meddling in the balance of nature, or a cosmic disruption but a normal cycle of wet and cool, hot and dry that has been going on for a long, long time---well before we were burning fossil fuels or pumping chemicals into the atmosphere.
Tree rings don't lie...but people with an agenda, do.
Originally posted by czygyny
Yep...I don't know about 'experts' and 'scientists' and their predictions and prognotisticating...but an aged white oak tree stump I happened along some years ago told a tale of cyclic wet and dry years for at least 200 years.
While our area experiences protracted droughts and then ample rain, this stump showed six or seven exeedingly rich, fat rings every half century or so, proving that perhaps what is going on right now is *not* the result of our meddling in the balance of nature, or a cosmic disruption but a normal cycle of wet and cool, hot and dry that has been going on for a long, long time---well before we were burning fossil fuels or pumping chemicals into the atmosphere.
Tree rings don't lie...but people with an agenda, do.
More than 30 researchers across Australia ranging from ecologists and environmental policy experts to meteorologists and atmospheric physicists told The Canberra Times they are receiving a stream of abusive emails threatening violence, sexual assault, public smear campaigns and attacks on family members. www.canberratimes.com.au...
"Cannibal" turned the failure of hope in Copenhagen By Rainer Daehnhardt In recent weeks witnessed fierce battles of campaigns and counter-information, with respect to the Copenhagen Summit. Some hoped to introduce a flat rate, which in turn require the creation of a world body, for collecting the same. Within this context, it is understood, for the first time that the famous chips, to be applied in automobiles, were not only to facilitate the collection of tolls on motorways (which enabled Wood to the rejection of its implementation). Were intended rather for permanent record of the movement of vehicles by satellite and will count the miles done per year, which would determine the amount of tax payable. It was also expected that this system was carried to such an extent that was possible only through its deployment of a global tax organization, via the United Nations and International Monetary Fund. Others hoped that Obama would take advantage to declare the creation of the North American Union, joining Canada, Mexico and the United States with the implementation of a new currency, as coined two years ago and called the AMERO. It is also speculated that the currency would be introduced this "Trizonia American and the Euro area. Could well be a joint devaluation of the dollar and the euro and closer interconnection of these peoples to explore. What nobody predicted was what eventually happened! The meetings prior to the summit demonstrated a total lack of understanding between different stakeholders. The conviction was so successful that the Danish minister, who organized the entire meeting, resigned in the middle of it, realizing that neither the Prime Minister showed his willingness to align with what was previously agreed. So many secret organizations that have intervened at this summit, which quickly established the Babylonian confusion, not knowing if more were to follow the individual wills of their rulers, their political groupings, their secret organizations or financial, that behind the scenes tried to make all the puppets dancing to your liking. It became a real mess! Crowds of Protestants, also organized and funded by handlers, caused the police intervention, which helped the "media circus". Thus, it is thought that the anti-globalist demonstrations and anti-pollution were the cause of the failure of Copenhagen. Nonsense! They had no weight in the matter, although the media like to make him understand. Who had the weight of the fly that made the arm of the balance of the events fall into the general debacle was only one delegate, the so-called "cannibal." A simple man, honest, confident and not afraid to raise your voice. I speak of the representative of Tuvalu, a tiny state of Polynesia, including Hawaii and Australia, comprised of nine islands, of which 6 are atolls with a total area of 26 km2, or one sixth of our island of Flores. Neighboring Samoa, Fiji and the Marshall Islands, sat out in the Berlin Conference, when Imperial Germany, Britain and France divided the zones of influence in Polynesia and protectorates. The reason they have stayed out was simple. Nobody wanted them then. Even cannibals lived there. The Americans sent in the second half of the nineteenth century, a mission comprising three missionaries to convince the islanders to embrace the American protection. Eventually be part of a great party menu tribal! Only in 1892 were convinced (by force) to accept their integration into British protectorates of islands in the South Seas in 1978 declared themselves independent. When the representative of these islanders arrived at Copenhagen, was enraged by his nation to have been forgotten in the representation of all the nations of the United Nations, presented a large globe of stone in the great hall. Resolved remedy this lack with his felt tip pen, showing the islands north of New Zealand and writing their name on the side. So far, so good! When, however, the U.S. representative tried to speak on behalf of all and in conclusion, having taken the word is already the 3rd time, without the Polynesian had been given the word, this, which explains the strong indignation, banned American use more the word! First because I had already spoken twice, and he represented the people of Tuvalu have not had the chance to say a word. Second, because it gave the U.S. the right to complete whatever it was on behalf of the representatives of other countries present in the room! And, thirdly, because everyone spoke only in amounts of money or percentages of pollution, when, in the case of his country, a rise in the sea in only half a meter, would condemn all of its islands to disappear! For his nation this is a life or death struggle and nothing was being seen in these terms in Copenhagen. When the Americans were silent and the room was shown to be largely beside the island, we saw that there was the slightest chance of agreement on anything. The Heads of State of the countries with the highest profile, then discovered they had very urgent matters on their agendas and left the scene, returning to their home countries without anything, except the shame of having fled to the truth. The Danes had given the name "HOPENHAGA" Summit will therefore thought that it could bring hope for a consensus in reducing air pollution. A Polynesian (corridors called the descendant of cannibals) ended up dropping the summit because it was not daunted. Armed with the truth publicly demonstrated that weak legs of clay have all this globalism. Unintentionally, have transformed the failure of Copenhagen in the hope that recognition of the weakness of this system, based on lies, can still save humanity.
Originally posted by kro32
Originally posted by reesie45
reply to post by kro32
Yeah but now they are saying its climate change is there a difference between global warming and climate change? I heard that in some places its getting colder so instead of the earth warming its getting colder. everything is so distorted anymore.
No the temperature is definetly going up world wide even if some specific locations get colder the overall temperature is rising. That's just a matter of taking temps around the world and you won't find a scientist who will debate that. It's just a fact.
The causes and future effects are debateable however and this is how the climate change plays in. Scientists don't really know what effect that drastically rising temps will have on weather so now it looks like this may be what is playing out.
Temps in the past have risen and fallen but if you do a bit of research you'll see charts showing that we are currently heating up faster, alot faster actually, than at any time in recorded history. Geologic recorded history mind you.
We were in normal cycles until the 1920's and since than the temp has gone pretty much straight up...way out of the ordinary so it's logical to expect that kind of increased warming to have some affect on weather patterns.
Originally posted by Stratus9
< snip >
So you tell me- WHO has an agenda? An agenda so extensive that it involves death threats? The only precursor to that I could even imagine would be to protect Billions in Oil and Coal profits.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by reesie45
It's called La Nina .. cooling of ocean water.. follows El Nino which is the warming of ocean waters.. this follows a cycle, has for millions of years.
Global Warming was a false attempt by Progressive to get us to pay more for "Green" items, and pay hefty taxes for "Sustainability"
Climate Change is the false idea by Progressives to replace Global Warming after it was proven to be a sham .. the end goal is still the same, taxation and corporate profits.
Neither exist.
Originally posted by thedeadwalkk
reply to post by reesie45
Heres a quick lesson on global warming:
Yes it has the name WARMING in the title, but that doesn't mean all it will do is WARM. It can WARM and COOL places based on their location.
--------------------
And btw to everyone saying this weather isn't "normal". Do you have the weather data for the past 10k+ years? no I didn't think so. When the earth has been around for millenia, you can't say "this weather isn't normal" based on weather nomalities for the past 30 years, because the Earth has been around for so long, 30 years is basically a milisecond in timespan.edit on 5-6-2011 by thedeadwalkk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by reesie45
It's called La Nina .. cooling of ocean water.. follows El Nino which is the warming of ocean waters.. this follows a cycle, has for millions of years.
Global Warming was a false attempt by Progressive to get us to pay more for "Green" items, and pay hefty taxes for "Sustainability"
Climate Change is the false idea by Progressives to replace Global Warming after it was proven to be a sham .. the end goal is still the same, taxation and corporate profits.
Neither exist.
“Globally, 2010 has been the warmest year since records began over 130 years ago, the ten warmest during that period all falling within the last 12 years. The warmer atmosphere and higher sea temperatures are having significant effects. Prof. Peter Höppe, Head of Munich Re’s Geo Risks Research/Corporate Climate Centre: “It’s as if the weather machine had changed up a gear. Unless binding carbon reduction targets stay on the agenda, future generations will bear the consequences.”
“Munich Re’s natural catastrophe database, the most comprehensive of its kind in the world, shows a marked increase in the number of weather-related events. For instance, globally there has been a more than threefold increase in loss-related floods since 1980 and more than double the number of windstorm natural catastrophes, with particularly heavy losses as a result of Atlantic hurricanes. ... it would seem that the only plausible explanation for the rise in weather-related catastrophes is climate change."
Originally posted by Stratus9
Guess what? La Nina is supposed to suppress storm formation off the Pacific coast- not enhance it.
While a typical La Niña — the low-temperature side of the cycle known as the El Niño/Southern Oscillation — usually brings wet weather to the western Pacific, it also brings dry conditions to the Southern United States, including Southern California.
Typical La Niña Impacts La Niña tends to bring nearly opposite effects of El Niño to the United States — wetter than normal conditions across the Pacific Northwest and dryer and warmer than normal conditions across much of the southern tier. The impacts of El Niño and La Niña at these latitudes are most clearly seen in wintertime. In the continental U.S., during El Niño years, temperatures in the winter are warmer than normal in the North Central States, and cooler than normal in the Southeast and the Southwest. During a La Niña year, winter temperatures are warmer than normal in the Southeast and cooler than normal in the Northwest.