It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Caintic
I know the debunkers are out in force tonight, but I've been waiting my 20 posts to finally post my own little story. Now I'm not going to claim this is "chem trails" nor do I think they are normal contrails either.
The date and time are with the photos so I'm not going to get into that. However not seen in the pics is the fact that I watched one jet do all of this. (Yes there is a major air port in Billings, and an air force base NW of here in Great Falls.)
Montana,WY, and North and South Dakota have been talking about cloud seeing for years now.Source
However since seeing this it's been raining here almost non stop. Billings its self has seen record amounts of rain fall, and other local towns have been flooding. Yes I know it's spring/summer time, and there is snow melt that factors into all this as well, but it's been ages since we've seen rain and flooding this bad in this area of the state.
Source
Could this be an example of cloud seeding gone bad? or could it be a test for weather mod. as a weapon??
I'm not saying it's either, just something to chew on.
edit on 30-5-2011 by Caintic because: for source add
LARAMIE, Wyo. — After six years of one of the biggest cloud seeding research efforts in the country, results are “trending positive.
But Barry Lawrence, project manager of the Wyoming Water Development Commission’s cloud seeding program, can’t say exactly how big a difference it’s making.
“We are in the middle of the project. We have about 100 cases now, and (the scientists) want 200 cases before we can make some conclusions,” he said.
Lawrence originally hoped for between 40 and 50 cases, or times when cloud seeding can happen, but the scientists have found between 30 and 40 actually happen.
This year, they only did 24 in the Sierra Madres and Medicine Bow mountain ranges because of too much snow.
The most recent ones include HIPLEX-1, a randomized cloud seeding experiment for rain augmentation carried out in Montana, and the North Dakota Cloud Modification Program, an operational project with dual objectives of rain augmentation and hail suppression. The evaluations are based on research aircraft, weather radar, and precipitation data along with cloud model simulations. Newly-developed non-parametric statistical techniques have been applied to elucidate the seeding effects.
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by firepilot
I am going to have to respectfully disagree, and offer this report from the Billing Gazette. No offense, but I live in the area on the Montana/Wyoming state line and I am only about two hours from Billings. The fact is that cloud seeding has been going on in Montana and Wyoming for years, matter of fact, the earliest study and experiments with cloud seeding in Wyoming and Montana really started kicking off in 2006. Anyway here is bit from the article and a link to the rest of it in the Billings Gazette.
LARAMIE, Wyo. — After six years of one of the biggest cloud seeding research efforts in the country, results are “trending positive.
But Barry Lawrence, project manager of the Wyoming Water Development Commission’s cloud seeding program, can’t say exactly how big a difference it’s making.
“We are in the middle of the project. We have about 100 cases now, and (the scientists) want 200 cases before we can make some conclusions,” he said.
Lawrence originally hoped for between 40 and 50 cases, or times when cloud seeding can happen, but the scientists have found between 30 and 40 actually happen.
This year, they only did 24 in the Sierra Madres and Medicine Bow mountain ranges because of too much snow.
Cloud Seeding
So you see, there is cloud seeding going on in Montana and because agriculture is huge in Billings, I would not be at all suprised to see some of the project expanding to that area.
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by firepilot
Ya I thought that you might bring that up. The projects origin is in Wyoming, but the the areas that were tested in this study, included (and do include) Montana, North Dakota, Colorado, and a small portion of South Dakota. I will look some more for the original funding proposal and link it for you too. Cloud seeding is not only happening in Montana, but it is a very active project right now.
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by Phage
I am not disputing that cloud seeding does or does not look like that. I am simply saying that cloud seeding is very active in Montana...what it looks like is really of interest to me. Chemtrails, contrails, etc...that is for the other experts here...not me...I don't have a clue if there is/is not chemtrails, but I do know there is cloud seeding and that is all I am trying to point out.
The most recent ones include HIPLEX-1, a randomized cloud seeding experiment for rain augmentation carried out in Montana, and the North Dakota Cloud Modification Program, an operational project with dual objectives of rain augmentation and hail suppression. The evaluations are based on research aircraft, weather radar, and precipitation data along with cloud model simulations. Newly-developed non-parametric statistical techniques have been applied to elucidate the seeding effects.
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by firepilot
What is not correct? That the funding went to the southeastern part of Montana too?
The map that is linked with this article is for the specific mountain ranges that they are talking about where the studies are currently being conducted.
Did you happen to look at this?
The most recent ones include HIPLEX-1, a randomized cloud seeding experiment for rain augmentation carried out in Montana, and the North Dakota Cloud Modification Program, an operational project with dual objectives of rain augmentation and hail suppression. The evaluations are based on research aircraft, weather radar, and precipitation data along with cloud model simulations. Newly-developed non-parametric statistical techniques have been applied to elucidate the seeding effects.
Why would they be monitoring Montana's seed clouding if it was not happening?edit on 31-5-2011 by jerryznv because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by firepilot
Ok you win...I don't know (or can not offer proof) of any cloud seeding operations in Montana either.
It must not exsist except in the airport that your referancing...all the rest of it has been done away with apparently and I am under the misunderstanding that they were included in the Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Colorado funding.
Sorry to have wasted your time with my mis-information.
Originally posted by Seagle
reply to post by jerryznv
Your wasting your time arguing with that fool. He doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and proves it time and time again.
The most ludicrous thing about these people arguing that cloud seeding cannot leave this type of trail is that they can understand how a Contrail forms but they can't comprehend how a similar trail could possibly form when you are purposely releasing or burning hygrospic particles for that very purpose.
Also, for the record, the days of cloud seeding operations being restricted to seeding exisitng cloud systems are over. That is why it is a booming industry again all around the world, now it works and it is almost forced upon many US by blackmail. Example, states along the colorado river that do not have an annual cloud seeding program no longer have access to water reserves should they be needed.
These people think the white lines on the road are contrails so take nothing they say as fact.
And Im going to bed so don't bother responding withy your nonsense fp beacause I have no intention of reading it.
Originally posted by jerryznv
reply to post by firepilot
Well I will admit that I know very little about seeding clouds or the operations that are current or past in the state of Montana, but I do live close to the state line and I watch the Wyoming goverment pretty close, so when it comes to fedral, or state funding for anything I am usually on top of it.
In this case I thought (and I should point out that I don't always know...imagine that) that when the last bill was proposed for further funding for seed clouding, and it's testing, I could almost swear that southeastern Montana was included in that proposal (that passed), and the money was allocated for just those purposes.
The three, sometimes four, states work very closely most of the time because it is such an unpopulated area and things seem to get done when everyone has the same agenda, not always, but most of the time.
Either way, I can not offer proof of any cloud seeding projects in Montana at this time...and to be honest...I am going to have to make some phone calls to see if I am just flat out dead wrong, or if they just are not disclosed to the public. Alot of private companys that seed clouds don't share it widely with the world, so I am going to have to just admit I am not sure right now.
Originally posted by Seagle
reply to post by jerryznv
The most ludicrous thing about these people arguing that cloud seeding cannot leave this type of trail is that they can understand how a Contrail forms but they can't comprehend how a similar trail could possibly form when you are purposely releasing or burning hygrospic particles for that very purpose.
Originally posted by Seagle
Also, for the record, the days of cloud seeding operations being restricted to seeding exisitng cloud systems are over.
The term chemtrail is derived from "chemical trail" in the similar fashion that contrail is a portmanteau of condensation trail. It does not refer to common forms of aerial spraying such as crop dusting, cloud seeding, skywriting, or aerial firefighting.
Huh?? How can you seed clouds without existing clouds??