It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DOADOA
feeemasons are just a bunch of wimps who could never cut it in a real mafia so they formed their little sausage organization to feel important. nothing they did or can do will ever be of any significance to anyone but themselves. nothing magical is going to happen because of said rituals.
Originally posted by DOADOA
feeemasons are just a bunch of wimps who could never cut it in a real mafia so they formed their little sausage organization to feel important. nothing they did or can do will ever be of any significance to anyone but themselves. nothing magical is going to happen because of said rituals.
Yes, it's in the book. And no, it's not actually done in the 33°. It used to be part of the Cerneau ritual, which was deemed "irregular" in the 1880s. In Chris Hodapp's book Deciphering the Lost Symbol he writes
Originally posted by lucysadvocate
I've heard something about the book going into the thirty third degree and exposing drinking wine from a human skull, is this in the book?
The specific ceremony described by Brown in the prologue of The Lost Symbol was adapted from a sensationalized exposé, Scotch Rite Masonry Illustrated, published in 1887 by the Reverend John Blanchard. Blanchard's description of the 33° has been repeated by many anti-Masonic authors over the years, even though it is not accurate. In his description, not only do 33°s drink from skulls, the lodge room is strewn with skeletons, and the candidate has skeletons thrust upon him in scenes more reminiscent of nineteenth-century Odd Fellows rituals.
Brown's use of Blanchard's imagery is surprising in light of the glowing comments he has made about Masonry since the publication of The Lost Symbol. In a recent interview with the Associate Press he said:
"I have enormous respect for the Masons. In the most fundamental terms, with different cultures killing each other over whose version of God is correct, here is a worldwide organization that essentially says, "We don't care what you call God, or what you think about God, only that you believe in a god and let's all stand together as brothers and look in the same direction.""
It could just be that Brown was taking poetic license and making Masonic ritual seem spookier than it is. Or he could be intentionally avoiding the exact wording out of respect, so as not to reveal the precise details of Masonic ceremonies. Or he simply got them wrong.
Was he really though? Or did the author of 10,000 Famous Freemasons confuse Giuseppe Mazzini with Giuseppe Garibaldi? I mean, you've got two guys named "Joe", neither of whom are particularly important to your own life or livelihood, it's possible you could get them confused. I poured through Google translations of essays on the Grand Lodge of Italy website and never actually found one that claimed Mazzini as a member, even though he's mentioned in a number of articles about his political significance. And 10,000 Famous Freemasons claims he was a Grand Master of their lodge, so you'd think they'd include him in lists and biographies of past Grand Master... They don't.
Originally posted by lucysadvocate
That guy is an idiot, Mazzini was a mason.
Originally posted by DOADOA
feeemasons are just a bunch of wimps who could never cut it in a real mafia so they formed their little sausage organization to feel important. nothing they did or can do will ever be of any significance to anyone but themselves. nothing magical is going to happen because of said rituals.
Originally posted by DOADOA
feeemasons are just a bunch of wimps who could never cut it in a real mafia so they formed their little sausage organization to feel important. nothing they did or can do will ever be of any significance to anyone but themselves. nothing magical is going to happen because of said rituals.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Was he really though? Or did the author of 10,000 Famous Freemasons confuse Giuseppe Mazzini with Giuseppe Garibaldi? I mean, you've got two guys named "Joe", neither of whom are particularly important to your own life or livelihood, it's possible you could get them confused. I poured through Google translations of essays on the Grand Lodge of Italy website and never actually found one that claimed Mazzini as a member, even though he's mentioned in a number of articles about his political significance. And 10,000 Famous Freemasons claims he was a Grand Master of their lodge, so you'd think they'd include him in lists and biographies of past Grand Master... They don't.
Originally posted by lucysadvocate
That guy is an idiot, Mazzini was a mason.