NIBIRU - First real possible indication

reply to post by Aromaz


I actually had started to consider that English was not your first language. But, grammar can be corrected in ones mind when reading.

Though, it's not why my brain hurts, thats for 2 other reasons. One being the correlation you've drawn between these rouge planets and Niburu. The other is the context of your statements, grammar aside, the context of your statements make no sense half the time, which is why I asked for clarity.

However, I am still put off by the ego your are letting run wild. I mean right out the gate you call ATS members lazy? How do you expect people to react to you? And you're very defensive about your credit to this story, which is kind of distasteful.

As for the grammar, why not use google translator to help you out in the future.

reply to post by Lighterside


Apologies. I was out of line.

Sentiments carried forward from another tread where I deleted my posting, saw the attack and reacted on full automatic. Had I seen anybody making a similar posting; or even this reference before my OP, then I would have posted there. I am not here to gain anything, whatever I do is for free. Even I can make money on HubPages.com, I have that disabled. So why accusing me of stealing their lime light?

BIG problem with Google; Translations are maybe good English grammar; but quite poor translation of the original content. Best I can do is MS-Word; but I do often get a blue line with no additional help.

The point made is the first line: For me (Personally) there is the indication and serious hope that NIBIRU might most likely lurk somewhere beyond the Oort Cloud. I did not state any of these rouge planets is Nibiru at all. Read my signature below: I still remain.

I am not so much defensive to my credit, I don't care even when people often quote my work;
but I am defensive about facts.
A copy is a copy; but if something is not a copy, even though related - it is still NOT a copy.
If someone accuse me of copying - in my book that is THEFT. I will NEVER accept that.
I post my own face on each of my posts all over the internet. That means I am not hiding.
I am prepared to face any critics on my writings; accept any responsibility for my words
- and I am not STEALING.
So if someone accuses me of STEALING their post, I take it as a personal blow in my face.

I used a reference, I credited the source. Then my points were:

A) I noticed a pointer - "Discovery of previously not proven rogue planets" For me - I SAT UP, took double take of notice with full attention. I researched it on few other relations. Now I have a possible HOPE that the whole issue of Nibiru might after all not be lost.

B) Rather than just keep on throwing mud at real hard working scientist and non-scientist; get involved with the real issue. Anybody can get all data files, software and images, so try to find Nibiru! So many people are so convinced of the government and NASA lies, then why not take up the keyboard and images - and find real proof they are lying?

C) In reference to the more than 100 threads about Nibiru - of which probably 90 is purest collection of junk because people fail to even seek a second form of confirmation. It is a heck of a lot to scan through when one is seeking with hope of finding additional pieces of (Factual) data!

I would not call this the 1st indication of Nibiru... Your heading is misleading, but never the less, this is interesting information.. thanks.

Originally posted by Redevilfan09
I would not call this the 1st indication of Nibiru... Your heading is misleading, but never the less, this is interesting information.. thanks.

Besides for old documents; yes you are right - this is potentially the third.
First is the suns rotational period and 11 year cycle;
The only other creditable indicator is the shape of planetary orbits and disputed behaviour of outer planets.

reply to post by IkNOwSTuff


The article states, "The newfound planets are located at an average approximate distance of 10,000 to 20,000 light-years from Earth." The Stitchens crowd have a long time to wait before their doom arrives if this is Planet X.

reply to post by Aromaz


I have plenty of happiness in my life.
I dont talk about my life on here though because MY life is none of YOUR business.
The fact you went so far as seeing every one of my posts from the 13 months I've been on here shows your grasping for dirt. My posts show nothing but me commenting on the material at hand. You say IM Mr. Negativity well buddy there's a lot more negative people on this site than just me.
You may be 55 years old but you sure don't act like it.
I never payed any attention to the points. I didn't even know there was points until the Jared Lee Loughner incident when I had 2 posts that caused me to get a 3 day cooling off period and well that's common.
Your thread title indicated that YOU saw a connection between these free floating planets and Nibiru which goes to show you may not have as much experience as you may think. Nibiru is supposed to be on a 3600 year ORBIT by legend. Not free floating around space.
Also the fact you have the time to pick through all of my posts like a parent shows YOU are on the internet all the time so you are guilty of that "lazy" crime like everyone else. I'd also like to add that I do not do the whole rival thing because there is no point. So Thanks but no thanks. For someone who claims to be mature and full of experience you really do not act like it so have a great day

Nothing in the article has anything whatsoever to do with Sitchin's hoax of Nibiru.

This should have been posted elsewhere and not in the 2012 thread.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ff18b238e31d.png[/atsimg]

Interesting video posted 15 July 2011 with heading:

Nasa Admits Possibility Of Companion Brown Dwarf = Nibiru

reply to post by Aromaz


NASA admits nothing. A brown dwarf neighbour does NOT mean companion to our sun.

You're just hearing what you want to hear.

Besides, what does a brown dwarf have to do with planets in the milkyway?

reply to post by Aromaz


You do know that everything Zecharia Sitchin ever told was made up gibberish so he could make money right?

Many, Many experts in ancient languages called him out and he never once responded.

www.sitchiniswrong.com... Read and learn my friend. This is the real expert, a man who Sitchin tried to imitate just to make money off of the people, and sadly many still believe his crap still today.

The truth is often scary than Sitchin's fantasy land.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Aromaz

 

NASA admits nothing. A brown dwarf neighbour does NOT mean companion to our sun.

You're just hearing what you want to hear.

Besides, what does a brown dwarf have to do with planets in the milkyway?

edit on 16/7/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)

It is in orbit with the Sun so how could it not be its companion??

The orbit is opposite of the planets and a very long one at that but it will make its appearance known here very soon. Besides the fact that many people have already spotted it via scopes and programs on the net, look at the way the earths magnetosphere has rapidly shifted, the natural disasters and the worlds governments have been freaking out building bunkers faster than Wal-marts.

reply to post by Sky watcher


Don't forget Charlie Sheen's tiger blood, which is code for Annunaki blood!

It's all connected.

reply to post by Sky watcher

Besides the fact that many people have already spotted it via scopes and programs on the net

Can you point me to those longitudes and latitudes? I will gladly get my scope back out to have to have a look see. I see nothing posted in any astronomy forums I peruse. There is nothing note worthy on any astronomy night sky views either. Such as stellarium, astroviewer, night sky? Maybe they are viewing the Vesta asteroid?
ats vesta/dawn link

reply to post by Sky watcher

It is in orbit with the Sun so how could it not be its companion??

The orbit is opposite of the planets and a very long one at that but it will make its appearance known here very soon. Besides the fact that many people have already spotted it via scopes and programs on the net, look at the way the earths magnetosphere has rapidly shifted, the natural disasters and the worlds governments have been freaking out building bunkers faster than Wal-marts.

No new large objects have been discovered. Whole sky surveys push the limits out so far and so dim that only amateurs with scopes capable of detecting objects dimmer than magnitude 18 could spot this object before whole sky surveys.

The object would have to be on top of us for it to affect the magnetosphere. Natural disasters are not affected by anythingother than the Moon. Even then the Moon has only a small effect.

The butt hurt is strong with this one....

Thanks for the links though, will be a fine addition to my Nibiru archive.