It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In Apology, Plato relates that:
[1] […] οὖτος μὲν οἴεταί τι εἰδέναι οὐκ εἰδώς, ἐγὼ δέ, ὥσπερ οὖν οὐκ οἶδα, οὐδὲ οἴμαι — This man, on one hand, believes that he knows something, while not knowing [anything]. On the other hand, I - equally ignorant - do not believe [that I know anything].
The impreciseness of the paraphrase of this as "I know that I know nothing" stems from the fact that the author is not saying that he does not know anything but means instead that one cannot know anything with absolute certainty but can feel confident about certain things.[2] This may be better exemplified in another translation, that is perhaps more correct, "I am only wise insofar as what I don't know, I don't think I know"
* False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil.
o Phædo 91
* In every one of us there are two ruling and directing principles, whose guidance we follow wherever they may lead; the one being an innate desire of pleasure; the other, an acquired judgment which aspires after excellence.
Matter Eater Lad
Matter Eater Lad should at least get the award for the worst superhero name in comic history. Matter Eater Lad was a character from Legion of the Superheroes. Now in the 1960s the writers at DC comics were always looking for new and strange powers for their quickly growing cast of teenage futuristic heroes. However, though it seemed like they’d hit their all time low with Bouncing Boy, it turned out they could sink even lower with Matter Eater Lad. Get this – Matter Eater Lad’s power was the ability to eat through any substance. Yup. The power of “super eating”. It kind of worked like this: you needed to get through a steel door you got Matter Eater Lad to “eat” it. Dig? However Matter Eater Lad wasn’t into cannibalism so he never actually chowed down on any bad guys. Mind you, I think cannibalism was against the comic code act back then.
Originally posted by timewalker
reply to post by awareness10
The only real answers are inside of yourself, your faith in other words.
We can search and search for "the answer" but it can be a thing that could take the rest of our lives reading about.
I also REALLY believe that no Operation or science will prove these things to us. This is a fools journey.
One of my favorite quotes supposedly by Socrate's, who some say was a disciple of Hermes himself.
Socrates left no writing of his own, but his disciple Plato, left these words for us in reference to his teacher.
"I know that I know nothing".
.............................................................
Go with your faith and nothing more and the answers will come to you.
I am guilty myself of thinking I know too much at times too.
Thanks to the Wise person who keeps opening my eyes.
Originally posted by timewalker
reply to post by Jinglelord
IMO Descartes was bought and paid for. Part of the reason we are where we are today.
See my VMS thread for that one.
I thought I would lose all you guy's on that post.
It is true though, this is why I don't play with Magick, there will be a price to be paid for it.
I have a fascination with reading about it, but trying to actually do it, no. Not needed.
Originally posted by timewalker
reply to post by Frater210
This is starting to be a bit much. I'm with you Frater210.
When I first started this thread, it was right about the time that this one took off. There is a thread started about Edgar Mitchell with right now 200 flags. here....www.abovetopsecret.com...........Well in this interview. He talks about the ufo's and such as usual and goes on and on but then he says, about how science is where it is today, Very serious like....'Listen to this closely, (reaffirms his seriousness again), "There was a philosopher in the time of the reformation of the Catholic church, Rene Descarte. He convinced the church to let him continue scientific explorations, under strict rule that all future academia would separate mind, body and soul from any further study." quoted to the best of my memory, its been a few days. (spoiler alert, he talks for 35 of the 45 minute interview before he even mentions any good stuff)
Well Rene has been popping up all over the place during my journeys studying this manuscript . Almost every Wiki Page I have linked through this thread, he is in. Go back and look if you wish.
The timing of these two releases are no mere coincidence, IMHO.
Rene Descartes separated the mind, body and soul from science under the Popes in this thread at Villa Mondragone.
And Edgar Mitchell puts the mind body and soul back into the science. He stated he had an Epiphany moment returning from walking on the moon. I have read that he conducted psychic experiments on the way back.
He has devoted his entire post NASA life putting the Psi. back into science.
Edgar Mitchell - Ions' - Instute of Noetic Sciences
I have known about the Ions institute before this, but again I think the release of the manuscript and his interview are no coincidence.
WTF?
I'll leave, for now, I keep coming back to this creepy thread, with this. Swami, we have thoroughly creeped each other out.
Pope Gregory XIII the dragons tomb.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/65e58616c08d.jpg[/atsimg]
Mars - The Dragon They preyed to. Look closely at his helmet , who the dragons are cowering from and the sperm like creature crawling up the (left side of pic) on his cape. coming from the ground none the less.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c608538398dc.jpg[/atsimg]
And from the homunculus Wiki.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d29330ad1c96.gif[/atsimg]
and yeah, some dizziness too....
But the reason which leads many to persuade them selves that there is a difficulty in knowing this truth, and even also in knowing what their mind really is, is that they never raise their thoughts above sensible objects, and are so accustomed to consider nothing except by way of imagination, which is a mode of thinking limited to material objects, that all that is not imaginable seems to them not intelligible. The truth of this is sufficiently manifest from the single circumstance, that the philosophers of the schools accept as a maxim that there is nothing in the understanding which was not previously in the senses, in which however it is certain that the ideas of God and of the soul have never been; and it appears to me that they who make use of their imagination to comprehend these ideas do exactly the some thing as if, in order to hear sounds or smell odors, they strove to avail themselves of their eyes; unless indeed that there is this difference, that the sense of sight does not afford us an inferior assurance to those of smell or hearing; in place of which, neither our imagination nor our senses can give us assurance of anything unless our understanding intervene.
n conclusion, I am unwilling here to say anything very specific of the progress which I expect to make for the future in the sciences, or to bind myself to the public by any promise which I am not certain of being able to fulfill; but this only will I say, that I have resolved to devote what time I may still have to live to no other occupation than that of endeavoring to acquire some knowledge of Nature, which shall be of such a kind as to enable us therefrom to deduce rules in medicine of greater certainty than those at present in use; and that my inclination is so much opposed to all other pursuits, especially to such as cannot be useful to some without being hurtful to others, that if, by any circumstances, I had been constrained to engage in such, I do not believe that I should have been able to succeed. Of this I here make a public declaration, though well aware that it cannot serve to procure for me any consideration in the world, which, however, I do not in the least affect; and I shall always hold myself more obliged to those through whose favor I am permitted to enjoy my retirement without interruption than to any who might offer me the highest earthly preferments.
I think he understood that God is Nature.
Originally posted by timewalker
reply to post by Jinglelord
Do you think that he, or you or me really has it figured out?
I don't. I also think that the whole practicing of procedures is discounting ones faith of what IS and that doing it is stating that you do not know, and you must have control over that.
To each their own. It is not for me.
edit on 5-6-2011 by timewalker because: (no reason given)
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
Also Douglas Adams
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.
There are nights when the wolves are silent and only the moon howls.