Ancient Mayan "Space Vehicle" Reverse Engineered.

Using the Ancient Mayan gold figurine as a guide, I made a model to see if it would fly with the HOLES on the wing. There is PHYSICAL PROOF (see links below) that other cultures way older than the Mayans and Before Christ that also showed technology. Being Naive about our Earth's history doesn't mean the evidence doesn't exist. It does. I only ask questions in this video and am not making any "religious statements". Inspired by the book Chariots of the Gods by Erich von Daniken and the History Channel's recent airing of shows about USO's, UFO's and Ancient Aliens, we find the Mayans were a mysterious people who had retreated deep into the rain forests of southern Mexico and Guatemala after the Spanish first arrived in the Yucatán in 1511. How could they dream up flying vehicles?
There are 5 figurines of (airplanes) found that are now owned by the State Bank of Bogota, Columbia.
Replicas were rumored to have once been offered for sale in the gift shop of a local museum until the stunning but obvious airplane connection was made, when they were quietly withdrawn.
Theres an uncanny resemblance to modern airplanes, but some mainstream archaeologists claim the tiny models are of insects, not of delta winged airplanes.
There are 5 types of such gold airplane configurations, but only 5 are presented here. *Note
There are no known South American insects that resemble these gold planes.
Besides, insects were never represented in gold.

In the video you will also see the
Syakou-ki-dogu
"Snow goggle-eyed figure"
Jomon Period, 12,000-300 BC (that is very old)

www.dudeman.net...
(This site is fantastic for history and pictures on all of this.)

Chariots of the Gods author, Erich von Daniken's website:
www.daniken.com...

The Tiahuanaco Heads
Were these heads carved on earlier protuberances of the wall by
people who settled in the abandoned city, and called it their own?

Whether they are the likenesses of their ancestors, elders or priests
perhaps they are also spiritual sentinels, placed there to protect them,
should the gods of the sky wish to return, one day, to reclaim their outpost.

There are several types of animals, which fly—birds, insects, and several mammals, such as bats and some gliders, for instance flying squirrels, opossums, and then there are some lizards; there are also some fish which for brief periods glide through the air. There are water animals which seem to fly through the water, such as rays, skates and some selachians.

But how does the depicted object compare with these choices? All its features taken into a consideration, we have no match.

Seen from above, the object obviously has no fish features, but seems to show rather explicitly mechanistic ones.

According to conventional science, neither the Incas nor the Maya or any other pre-Columbian society had the wheel.

Everyone marvels at the huge blocks used to build the pyramids of Egypt and the tight tolerances between them. www.gizapyramids.org...
The megalithic structure at Sacsayhuaman in Peru has equaled those tolerances with huge multi-sided blocks which are all completely irregular in a kind of three dimensional jigsaw puzzle. According to Graham Hancock, archaeologist, one of those stones is 29 feet high and weighs more than 360 tons; the equivalent of 500 passenger automobiles.

That stone is not even at the base of the wall. Yet, the quarry is from which the granite blocks were cut was more than 10 miles away. www.world-mysteries.com...
Easter Island is another amazing wonder with Figurines so heavy and tall, no one knows exactly how they got there. www.mysteriousplaces.com...

Then there are the runway lines at Nasca and figures drawn on the Earth that can only be seen from above while flying over.

channel.nationalgeographic.com...
Beyond all those interesting places, as you can see my model Ancient Aircraft flew.

It flew very well, fast or slow. Did the holes on the leading edge give it the tremendous lift? I dunno, but I do know it works.
Thanks for Watching, Subscribing and Rating.
Dave Herbert
AMA # 8221,
LM/CD/Scientific

Here are some RC, History, and toy links:
The History Channel: www.history.com...
NitroPlanes airplanes and jets
www.jdoqocy.com...
www.tkqlhce.com...
Xheli helicopters
www.dpbolvw.net...
www.jdoqocy.com...
Disney Toy Store
www.dpbolvw.net...
www.jdoqocy.com...
HobbyPartz
www.hobbypartz.com...
Mercury Adhesives.
www.AtlantaHobby.com...
Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA)
www.modelaircraft.org...
WillyGoat Toy store
www.tkqlhce.com...

very good find, seen this on the ancient alien program you were talking about, S&F !

Wow, all I gotta say is outstanding research!!
S&F

reply to post by sandesh


Already a thread about this.

Use the ATS Search!

And.....there is but ONE or two examples of that trinket (and it is INCAN in origin, I believe) . Not Maya.

Also...the scientific consensus is, it is a stylized jewelry representation of a bird.....NOT a man-made *craft*.

reply to post by weedwhacker

Also...the scientific consensus is, it is a stylized jewelry representation of a bird.....NOT a man-made *craft*.

BS Weed...
The majority of people would look at that and say it's a plane..
You DON'T need to be a scientist or has been pilot to know that.!!

reply to post by weedwhacker


Here is an article about 'ancient flying machines' which includes the one mentioned by the OP.

www.world-mysteries.com...

wow sandesh you have been busy today this must be about your 6th thread..

This has been posted before but always a interisting read thanks for the thread

reply to post by Dastardly666


Well aware of those speculative articles.

Those references are discussed in the other, older and very long thread....hang on, I hoped someone else would do the work to find it.....

HERE: 1.000 years old Inca artifact proven to be a replica of an ancient aircraft.

Of course, like so many overly-stated thread titles, the word "proven" (along with "proof") is over-used.....>sigh<

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Dastardly666

 

Well aware of those speculative articles.

Those references are discussed in the other, older and very long thread....hang on, I hoped someone else would do the work to find it.....

HERE: 1.000 years old Inca artifact proven to be a replica of an ancient aircraft.

Of course, like so many overly-stated thread titles, the word "proven" (along with "proof") is over-used.....>sigh<

Closed.