Non youtube UFO footage with bonus ET.

UFO with Aliens in

Looking around the world wide web for UFO footage that I haven't seen before. This one caught my attention. I'm 50/50 on this one at the moment.

reply to post by ATSecretAgent


here are a few threads on the topic.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

just as help for you

has been covered million times this one

Kool, Mods can just close this thread.

reply to post by ATSecretAgent


It helps to use the search function.

Don't worry. Other people have been tripped up like this before.

Originally posted by ATSecretAgent
I'm 50/50 on this one at the moment.

I think this has finally been determined to be somebody filming poorly through a telescope at an internal refraction/reflection inside the telescope, and not something actually out flying or hovering over the water. The speck of light is refracting off a mirror or lens and showing up on the inside of the hand-held, misaligned telescope.

I looked at the older threads, the video I linked too is a recently edited version. Having looked again, the stills showing the "ET's" don't appear in the actual video footage.

reply to post by ATSecretAgent


Hi,

This is my favourite video to date.

If you read through the previous threads, some have tried to debunk it and failed, and its not in the hoax bin.

I think I read somewhere the video was checked and found to be authentic.

What bothers me is that they supposedly filmed this object returning over a period of three years and didn't take along a bloody tripod....

Originally posted by ATSecretAgent
What bothers me is that they supposedly filmed this object returning over a period of three years and didn't take along a bloody tripod....

The thing is, if you look at all the footage, including the stuff he shot of the nearby shore, you'll see that what he's doing is holding up an external telescope to the video camera and filming through that. So he's getting a video of a reflection of light refracting off the inside of the telescope. That's why it's always in the same spot so many years in a row.

It's not that it isn't "authentic." He's filming what he sees in the viewfinder. Unfortunately, it's not a UFO with aliens, as it has been mistakenly interpreted to be, but bad photography.

Have to say I got a bit of a chill watching that. I think this one would be hard to debunk.

Honestly I don't see why re posts are such a bad thing. If this guy hadn't posted this I wouldn't have seen it. S&F for you.

If it's been done before then just ignore it. But remember that the conversations will be different every time.

reply to post by Blue Shift


If you watch the video the guy that shot it says that they used a 200mm lens with an electronic doubler. There was no telescope involved. If you have ever shot under high zoom, even with a tripod you are going to get wiggle, from soft ground, wind, the act of looking through the viewfinder. It has also been independently examined and the conclusion was that whatever was on the screen was actually there, no light reflections.

I'm still not putting it at 100%, I would say it's reaching 75% though.

Originally posted by Blue Shift

Originally posted by ATSecretAgent
What bothers me is that they supposedly filmed this object returning over a period of three years and didn't take along a bloody tripod....

The thing is, if you look at all the footage, including the stuff he shot of the nearby shore, you'll see that what he's doing is holding up an external telescope to the video camera and filming through that. So he's getting a video of a reflection of light refracting off the inside of the telescope. That's why it's always in the same spot so many years in a row.

It's not that it isn't "authentic." He's filming what he sees in the viewfinder. Unfortunately, it's not a UFO with aliens, as it has been mistakenly interpreted to be, but bad photography.

Can you please make something similar or give links to explain the phenomenon responsible? It would be nice to take someones word, but I don't see anything resembling a telescope and haven't heard your explanation brought up elsewhere.

Good idea. If anyone could recreate the video with a telescope and produce similar results we could perhaps debunk this one. But as mentioned, the chap filming the 2009 shots stated they were using a large lens, not a telescope.

I have watched this over and over and after my 5th watch, I was finally able to see the "movement" of one of the ET's arms.

Here is an 18 page ATS thread on this case. There are various debunking scenarios included.

www.abovetopsecret.com...