Calling all ATS Osama Dead huh? What are they breaking the news to hide? Let's start digging please

reply to post by DeusVult


Good for you...Glad you have a secured job amongst the many that are not employed right now...I know a few..Had an old buddy stop by and ask me for an unreal amount of money to "get by". Guess the Mcmansion didn't pan out like he thought!!!

The only reason I asked about your credentials was to make sure you would at least come back on and post.

As far as my sis in law with the cdc and radiation.........

Don't you think it is odd that someone with any 3 letter org. has been told not to say anything in regard to anything?

Ask a "friend" at the EPA why we are not getting the correct readings from the U.S. units on radiation and why some have been shut down completely and they will most likely say, "I can't tell you anything about that right now".

Sounds like the same thing I heard in the marines..".You can't tell anyone where you are being deployed to at this time and if you do, you will be subject to a court marshall"............hmmmmm

pretty much made you not want to talk.

So, If I swab my cheek right now and send it to you, how quickly can you have it back to me.....I will pay all FED EX costs for overnight............

just curious...........

reply to post by sirjunlegun


Is it just me or did she recant that statement? I'm just saying Maybe she recanted it because it was a slip or because it was...uh...true? Who's to know?

Originally posted by theonlyrusty
killed and buried in 24 hours?

someone care to explain to me how the dna was obtained and tested that quick?

www.dnatestingcentre.com...

Who actually did this dna test and who took the pictures?

just curious................

DNA testing takes only a few hours without a backlog(even the page you linked says they can have it same-day), and the SEALs had people documenting the operation. Obtaining the DNA would be as simple as snipping a lock of hair or getting some blood.

reply to post by OmiCron


SETI was put in hibernation due to having no money. It is privately funded. They state that when they have enough money /donations it can become active again.

Originally posted by EL1A5
So the story of OBL's death has changed I hear; makes me wonder how many times it is going to change.

By JOSH GERSTEIN | 5/2/11 11:37 PM EDT Updated: 5/3/11 7:53 AM EDT
The White House backed away Monday evening from key details in its narrative about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, including claims by senior U.S. officials that the Al Qaeda leader had a weapon and may have fired it during a gun battle with U.S. forces.

Read more: www.politico.com...

Several, until an official account is released in full.

Originally posted by theonlyrusty
Not gonna reply to one single ats post but it sure seems to me that alot of folks here are really brainwashed by the OS.

People who disagree with you could only be brainwashed instead of having a different opinion, we've heard it all before.

SOMEONE said..."Who cares if he.....".....The msm had you right there. They are so good at what they do that they have you touting THEIR agenda and you don't even know it. You have possibly stopped thinking for yourself and you think that whatever you hear on the news, internet, radio, etc...is somehow the gospel truth.

You're basing a federal case, metaphorically, off of four words with no context.

Please take a moment and ask yourself these questions..........

Who was there at this raid?

Who actually SAW what happened?

Who reported it?

If there is any doubt to ANY of those questions......well, you might not be hearing the truth.

"Just cause ya heard it on CNN don't make it SO.".......

Doesn't make it un-SO, either.

There was an Olympic bomber in Atlanta one time and they had him pegged as the mastermind of this "atrocious" crime........Come to find out, it wasn't him...Hmmmm..ruined his life and all sorts of stuff cause the media can say anything they want and then they only have to substantiate the facts if they are called on it.

They could say anything they want about this OBL thing and there is NO ONE to actually have the facts to substantiate the truth....

So it's best to assume everything they say is a lie. Got it.

reply to post by 000063


You are picking on the detail of why people dont believe this part, or that part, and pretending that if the details cant be proven, they have no reason to doubt the party line.

Wrong.

Bottom line, they have lied to us before. It is completely rational to be skeptical of the word of known liars.

If they want the American people to take them at their word, they need to start behaving with integrity, and transparency. The people are not skeptical because they are nuts, skepticism when dealing with people who have been lying and concealing from you is sane, and rational.

reply to post by TexasChem


If the CIA hadn't created and trained all of the "Al-CIAda" leaders, this so-called "war on terror" would have went belly up years ago.

I suspect there never was an OBL.

But now that he has been media projected as this great"evil" and the good guys with their special forces"got him" we should all keep supporting the Mil-Industrial status quo.

War is good.


buried at sea my arse,

Sri Oracle

Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
If they want the American people to take them at their word, they need to start behaving with integrity, and transparency. The people are not skeptical because they are nuts, skepticism when dealing with people who have been lying and concealing from you is sane, and rational.

Assuming the military's DNA tests are wrong in this case, and only this case, without evidence, isn't so much "skepticism" as blind doubt.

Yes, they might have a motive, but it can't be proven whether they actually faked it or or not. Given that their other DNA tests are accepted, dismissing this one entirely, out of hand. isn't logical.

here is Alex Jones from yesterday re: OBL hoax
www.youtube.com...

Can anyone tell me why the US government is putting out so much disinformation.

All the people in the image below saw the event. How can they all not know whether it took place this week or Sunday?
Whether he was hiding behind his wife with an AK47 or just resisting arrest unarmed?

Whether his 12 year old daughter was in the room?

Can we see the interviews with his surviving wife and daughter? Can we see his son in custody and have his name?

The information correct or other wise only comes from the US government press office and so can only be a ploy to cause "media noise".......

reply to post by fdcows


Recently registered, standing in defence of the Government without employing any lateral thinking in the analysis of the topic in hand (SETI shutdown). Seems a bit suspicious, but maybe I'm paranoid.

reply to post by 000063


You sound like a tamer version of Weedwhacker. Did you know that?

You've not actually employed any critical thinking in your post, despite obvious efforts to look like 'the rational one'. I don't buy it, and I don't buy your shill tactics.

As someone else has said, 'why so much disinfo'..? There's no smoke without fire people, keep looking. And check out BurnTheShips thread about the Monsanto shenanigans involving the EPA, which occurred just when the rest of the world was looking at the Royal wedding... (etc)

One Hand presents the distraction, the other Hand pulls the rug from under your feet.

Sorry to butt in the middle of any debates. None the less, if you haven't seen it yet. Your voice, is out there thanks to your involvement in this thread. If you haven't seen it yet, look at this thread I created at your leisure.

Success at Getting "Our" ATS Voice into the MSM - OBL Conspiracy - (99.6% positive, you decide)

Keep up the good work!! Thank you all for your voice and your contributions thus far!!

Respectfully,
UberL33t

reply to post by 000063

(this quote is taken from IllusionsAreGrander's post, in response to 000063 a few posts up)

Bottom line, they have lied to us before. It is completely rational to be skeptical of the word of known liars.

So, Mr/s 000063. Why did you not reply to this quite simple premise that invalidates your argument? Are you by any chance trying to deflect from the truth of the matter?

You ignored the key underpinning statement in IllusionsAreGrander's post, and instead twisted things to allow you to go off on a little meandering tangent, into another type of blame game.

Here's that death-blow again, for clarification of what you should be focusing on - the point that defeats your shillish arguments:

If they have lied to us before, why should we trust anything they say when it comes to events that are directly linked to those matters about which they have lied to us previously...?!?!?!?!?

You can't actually counter that argument with anything (that anyone in the real world would consider) acceptable; therefore anything you do say in efforts to perpetuate your argument is going to sound pretty damn lame.

reply to post by 000063


hahahah..

so, you posted just to bash my opinions but you didn't have the gall to answer any of the questions I put forth.

You are the msm's best weapon.

Look how ridiculous your post is.

Nothing whatsoever about the OP, just a delusional blabber about what I said...

You need to go on the Bill O'Reiley show...I am sure you would agree with everything he says...

Our species is a worthless POS and YOU are the leader.......It's nice to know that we are the most intelligent beings in the universe........!!!

unreal....go watch DWTS........

Not sure where the original source is from but I just saw this image on an Alex Jones Video. He surmises it is fake. What do you think....?

It's at 3.47 into the video.



Screen shot image below......



My first question is can we get confirmation from his daughter that he dyed his beard? Or from the guy who purchased food and medicine or even from the owners of the local pharmacy!

O.k. so "officials" keep changing their story. I'm fairly sure it is because they themselves don't have accurate information or are wondering about the implications of certain "facts".

What we do know is that..
Osama resisted.
Osama was killed.
Osama's son was killed.
Osama may have or may not have used a woman as a shield.
A woman, probably one of his wives was shot in the leg, and or was killed.
Guards were killed.
24 people were killed total.
There were no SEAL casualties.
Osama's corpse in at least a few pictures I've seen don't match. Some are faked or Photoshopped.
"Officials" may not have released any of the real photos or video yet.

What I know is, the photo of Obama and Clinton in the situation room shows both of them witnessing a killing.

reply to post by ren1999


It doesnt matter if he had a weapon or not, nor does it matter if he used a shield or not. Even if he was surrendering, I am glad the shot was taken and this person was eliminated.

He was given the same options as he gave the people on the aircraft and those in the buildings on 9/11.

If anything, being shot in the head was too good of a death for him.