It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I find that hard to believe, considering that I've said, multiple times, that I'm not American, and to stop using ad hominem on me. Unless you have some sort of psychic ability to tell whether or not someone is American through a computer screen, cut it out.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by 000063
If a cop shoots into a crowd trying to hit one man, they'd take away his badge and gun in an instant.
Ding! Ding! Ding! Because, as I've said, Americans like you (and you are an American, I'm not stupid),
Risking accidental collateral damage to civilians (US) is quite different from maliciously targeting civilians(terrorists).
believe only Americans are people.
Internal affairs, possibly a court of law. Cops are specifically instructed not to fire into crowds. Anyone that does is either irresponsible or has made a serious error in judgement. My analogy works better: accidental collateral damage, not irresponsibility.
Who's to say the cop wasn't trying to "limit" harm to non-combatants as well?
As well they should.
They'd still take away his badge.
IMO too, but they aren't as close as you keep asserting.
There's a slight difference, as I've said. Both kill large numbers of innocent people, in order to achieve a political goal. Terrorists target innocents, yes. Soldiers target the bad guys, but accept that innocents will also die as just part of war. Both are wrong, IMO.
Life is conflict. People will always fight over something. A world without war would be nice, but it's not going to happen anytime soon. The best they can do is try to cause as little damage as possible. Terrorists don't bother with that little inconvenience.
War, is something that should be a thing of the past. We are all humans, and the people need to stand up against the elitist scumbags who deceive us all into killing each other,
I fail to see how Cheney profits if I bleed out in the gutter over a $2 beer.
while they sit atop their thrones and get richer.edit on 4-5-2011 by 27jd because: (no reason given)edit on 4-5-2011 by 27jd because: (no reason given)
I actually heard the same thing on the radio this morning, I think it was the Jim Bohannon syndicated show.
Originally posted by Annee
I was just listening to a talk radio show - - and the guest was saying - - from him talking to Muslim youths - - they are tired of war. They are not upset about Osama being killed. They don't want old world terrorism - - they want democracy.
I thought it was interesting and believable.
Sigh.
Originally posted by spy66
Exactly.
There are no evidence that OBL actually got killed in this raid.
We know there was a raid. But that is it.
The reports on the rumors have changed. The official story has yet to be released in full.
Can we trust a government that changes its official statement time after time? NO.
They did a DNA test, and Al-Qaeda hasn't contradicted them. If they could prove, or even create suspicion, that the US was lying, why wouldn't they?
Originally posted by spy66
Can we trust a government that changes its official statement time after time? NO.
Originally posted by 000063
I find that hard to believe, considering that I've said, multiple times, that I'm not American, and to stop using ad hominem on me. Unless you have some sort of psychic ability to tell whether or not someone is American through a computer screen, cut it out.
Risking accidental collateral damage to civilians (US) is quite different from maliciously targeting civilians(terrorists).
I fail to see how Cheney profits if I bleed out in the gutter over a $2 beer.
Originally posted by Annee
I was just listening to a talk radio show - - and the guest was saying - - from him talking to Muslim youths - - they are tired of war. They are not upset about Osama being killed. They don't want old world terrorism - - they want democracy.
I thought it was interesting and believable.
Originally posted by shamaniski
I could give a # less about Obama's birth certificate. Don't blame you for not wanting to look at a guy with his head blown open. Who likes to look at that kind of stuff. I don't but its just common sense to be skeptical about this story when there's a lot of holes in the story.
Yes, cost....
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by spy66
That isn't how a democracy works.
That's how a country run by polling works, AND since then it would be a straight up "force by majority" without any representation of the minorities, it is a perfect example of how w Polling Fascist state would work
YAY!
Which really isn't the same thing, and would be ridiculous in the amount it would cost.
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by Annee
I was just listening to a talk radio show - - and the guest was saying - - from him talking to Muslim youths - - they are tired of war. They are not upset about Osama being killed. They don't want old world terrorism - - they want democracy.
I thought it was interesting and believable.
They want democracy?
What is so great about our democracy?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by Annee
I was just listening to a talk radio show - - and the guest was saying - - from him talking to Muslim youths - - they are tired of war. They are not upset about Osama being killed. They don't want old world terrorism - - they want democracy.
I thought it was interesting and believable.
They want democracy?
What is so great about our democracy?
I'm not going to get into the semantics of what democracy is or means to Muslim youth.
The US is not a democracy anyway - - - its a republic.
Originally posted by butcherguy
I actually heard the same thing on the radio this morning, I think it was the Jim Bohannon syndicated show.
Originally posted by Annee
I was just listening to a talk radio show - - and the guest was saying - - from him talking to Muslim youths - - they are tired of war. They are not upset about Osama being killed. They don't want old world terrorism - - they want democracy.
I thought it was interesting and believable.
I hope that it is true.
Originally posted by Annee
By the way - - I am against releasing graphic death pictures of anyone.
I was also against releasing photos of Princess Diana.
I was horrified by the pictures of Saddam's sons.
I get no satisfaction from any death picture. I find it incredibly morbid.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by Annee
That's fine Annee, don't look at them. Some of us do want to see the photos, not because we get off on it, but because we want to verify that we're not being lied to, again. You know I'm not wanting to celebrate this, please stop trying to force your beliefs and wishes on all of us. Just don't look, simple as that. Either way, they're not gonna be released, because our government is lying to us, again.
edit on 4-5-2011 by 27jd because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spy66
The US is far from a republic. It is a Oligarchy. Ruled by the elite.
But go by the name of "a democracy".