It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GWYNPLAINE
Originally posted by Teeky
reply to post by intrepid
The older generations don't trust their own judgement. They raised us, so be confident that younger generations are capable of leading us into a more futuristic future.
"FUTURISTIC FUTURE..." This is an example of my post above. I'm sure the owners/ moderators are howling!
I think anyone over 50 just needs to step back and let the people who have a firm grasp of technology and how the world works do the thinking and voting.
see the problem is the "old" just keep piling up. due to the increase in votes, our actions will be lead towards entitlement programs and transfer payments. A general lack of care for the future, only concerned about morsels they can get now. Our country cant afford our old people. Not to mention that the older people get, the more confused they get. I would say limit the age to 65.
We are the ones who will have to live with the long term consequences of our current actions, not the "old folk"
"GRAMMAR" you mean?
Originally posted by GWYNPLAINE
reply to post by Teeky
I was referring to the GRAMMER. Another example of some of the people here who don't get it.
Moderators: Please end this thread. Have you no shame? You're gonna be responsible for:
A. GIVING THE OLD PEOPLE STROKES AND HEART ATTACKS and
B. CAUSING THE YOUNG PEOPLE TO FILL THEIR DIAPERS AND SOIL THEIR LAZY BUTTS.
How many of you young uns would risk facing a line of policemen marching towards you in battle formation with billy clubs, shields and visors?