what is your explanation on why no ordinary media talk about recent "memos" of Roswell ?

Hi,

If they are taken from recently declassified official site of NSA or CIA or NASA, those memos quoting early 50s stating saucers recovery and bodies and all.. Why is conventionnal media is not all over it? What is your ideas about that?

I might have missed a step and they were prooven hoax, in that case nevermind but last time I check they were taken from recently declassiffied documents. So, if from proper channel.. why is not that spoken on CNN or ABC or any major news network?

The sheeple are more concerned with the birther bull#.

I am not disputing your assertion about newly released documents, but I'm asking because I don't know. Are there documents released about Roswell indicating a saucer and recovered bodies? Are there any links to these documents so we can look? I'd be interested to see them! Thanks.

i think the media have better things to report on besides some letters sent to govenment agents by random nutjobs

I visit some sites.. here some

www.ufo-blogger.com...




here another one

reply to post by korats

It has been all over media here in Norway.
We have even had such articles several days in a row about different such documents.

Well, your lucky bc on all my canadian news and american news I check everyday for normal info.. I'v come accross NADA.

I heard that they aren't new memos, just a new search engine made them easier to find. And that most are just reports from the public and are unsubstantial. But that's just what I heard. And that is probably from here on ATS. So really, does what I've heard hold any more merit than what you say?

reply to post by korats


I've heard tons about released documents on the news, I'm surprised you havent. Plus the main one you are referring to is not new, and has already been debunked in other threads, such as here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I don't know how many times this has been stated here; and I cannot estimate how many more times it needs to be stated:

They are not hoaxes and they are not disclosure. They are simply misreadings. The FBI memo went like this: An Air Force investigator told an FBI agent that someone told him a saucer had crashed and that alien bodies had been recovered. The agent expresses no opinion about the truth of the matter. He simply reports what an Air Force investigator said that someone else told him about the crashed saucers. The agent does not follow up, and makes a notation that no follow-up was done.

Put another way: An agent got a call from a "UFO nut" and didn't follow up. There is no story there. People: Read! The! Memo!

In the NSA case (not NASA), again, there was no hoax and no disclosure. The misunderstanding proceeds from the fact that ambiguous statements seemed to indicate that there were alien messages. A closer reading shows that it was an exercise in an NSA house magazine--that is, that a puzzle was published one month, and the answer the next month--something like the crossword puzzles that we're all familiar with.

A little research--indeed, a simple search on this very site--would answer all these questions. The same information can easily be found a million places on the Internet. No f---ing wonder the elitists treat us like mindless sheep....

reply to post by darbur


This. This 100 times.

I've been saying it all along now but...

Wiki - Streisand effect

You think they wouldn't catch on, with the internet what it is today?

Originally posted by korats
Hi,

If they are taken from recently declassified official site of NSA or CIA or NASA, those memos quoting early 50s stating saucers recovery and bodies and all.. Why is conventionnal media is not all over it? What is your ideas about that?

I might have missed a step and they were prooven hoax, in that case nevermind but last time I check they were taken from recently declassiffied documents. So, if from proper channel.. why is not that spoken on CNN or ABC or any major news network?

For the same reason they dont show images of US war dead.

I would think it is obvious... The topic has been stigmatized over the years to the point where the general populace considers the topic to be fringe, 'kookie' and laughable. This is why no reputable scientist will study the phenomenon. Even though there is clearly some effect there to be studied, do treat it seriously is self-damning.