NSA Document Admits ET Contact

I guess I'm not surprised at all, since extraterrestrial have been sending us messages in the form of crop circles.

There were a total of 29 messages to be decoded—quite an undertaking.

It is curious, to say the least, that this document was cleared for release on October 21, 2004. Why was that? Because the NSA did not release it into public information until April 21, 2011. Though cleared for release, the NSA had been stonewalling it along with hundreds of other NSA documents about contact with UFOs and extraterrestrials until they lost the lawsuit brought by Peter Gersten, a lawyer from Arizona. When they well and truly lost, the judge’s order had to be carried out, and the documents had to be released.

Dr. Campaigne focused on a set of information in a couple of the messages that turn out to be some mathematical equations. They also contain the listing of all the elements in our Periodic Table. I suppose those equations may make some sense to a physicist or engineer, but do not mean anything to me. I clearly understand how Dr. Campaigne came to the translation since he explains it very well. But, as to what the meaning of the equations are, I could not venture a guess.

It is curious, though, that during his presentation Dr. Campaigne mentions there are “words” that they have translated, and some “words” they have not yet begun to understand. He gives an example of a connective word that he knows is connective (joining two or more statements) but does not yet understand the translation of that word.

www.ufodigest.com...

reply to post by MIDNIGHTSUN


Many , many threads already on this topic .
ATS search and you will find

Old news.

reply to post by MIDNIGHTSUN


Yes already posted a while back and I believe the consensus was a mental test for code breakers, not actual ET signals to be decoded.

the fact is, if you simply go read the actual PDF you'd immediately see a few things....

First. It was set for release in 2004 (I believe 04, it's on the page)
Second. It has a UNCLASSIFIED on each page.

reply to post by gortex


Yes there are, but none that have evidence suggesting that what the above statement about 2004 but wasn't released until 2011.

Jamie.

reply to post by pandapowerjamie

post by pandapowerjamie
Yes there are, but none that have evidence suggesting that what the above statement about 2004 but wasn't released until 2011.

That doesn't change the fact that as mentioned by phishyblankwaters the messages weren't from ET , they were a decoding exercise , so it really doesn't matter when they were released .

www.abovetopsecret.com...