It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BigBruddah
reply to post by Daniyal
Sorry, but this thread has done nothing to sway my views on Muslims. Why are they coming to our countries and then refusing to intergrate into our societies. Over there if women don't comply they'd be killed on the spot yet in the white countries Muslims are free to do as they say and please because its their culture. Of course its not the majority that do this but it is still bad to see many Muslims refusing to adapt to a country that they are supposed to call home.
Originally posted by BigBruddah
Over there if women don't comply they'd be killed on the spot
Originally posted by sara123123
In the UK they are demanding that all women wear burkahs in an area in which Muslims are the majority. They are threatening to kill women who disobey their rotten souls. What is going to happen eventually is that the Muslim with the help of liberals are going to push so far, they end up getting slaughtered.
Originally posted by pro-all
The point everybody is missing here is that muslims from war torn areas should be moving to other islamic countries not to countries where bacon is served for breakfast. I as a nonreligious person find it very distastful that muslims want locals of their new home to adapt to their religion and culture. Ask yourself, why does saudi Arabia not welcome refugees from islamic countries? I personally do feel that it is all a progammed event to achieve certain agenda. How else can one explain that muslim immigrants who make up less than 2% of the population want to impose their wish on their new "home" country?
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by pro-all
Originally posted by pro-all
The point everybody is missing here is that muslims from war torn areas should be moving to other islamic countries not to countries where bacon is served for breakfast. I as a nonreligious person find it very distastful that muslims want locals of their new home to adapt to their religion and culture. Ask yourself, why does saudi Arabia not welcome refugees from islamic countries? I personally do feel that it is all a progammed event to achieve certain agenda. How else can one explain that muslim immigrants who make up less than 2% of the population want to impose their wish on their new "home" country?
Again this vague insinuation of "wanting to change our laws" or "wanting to impose their wish on us". What does it mean? In what sense is this being done?
You find it distasteful that someone would wish to exercise their freedom of choice to NOT choose to have bacon for breakfast? I guess you don't think jews belong in the US either, then? Or some Hindus and Buddhists or Jains? Or even vegans?
Muslims certainly seem fairly boxed in, with no way out. If they get something for breakfast without bacon in it (using your example), then people will look at them angrily and tell them to "GO BACK HOME!" and "Don't you impose your culture on us!". If they decide to go across the street to the newly opened Halal diner (which opened for this very reason), then people will accuse them of segregating themselves, and not integrating, and will begin picketing the diner and telling them "GO BACK HOME!" "Don't impose your culture on us!"
Also, out of curiousity, who is doing this "programming"? You do realise that unlike Christianity (especially catholic Christianity), Islam doesn't have any hierarchy with some sort of "Priest" "Super-Priest" "Pope-Priest" levels. In fact, even at their "Priest" level, the guy has no power over his congregation, and the congregation has no obligation to the priest, except that the priest lead them in prayer.edit on 19-4-2011 by babloyi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pro-all
Muslims like you seem conveniently at ease leaving out the belligerent stance of your religion. I have never heard of Hindus or bhuddists wanting to impose their will on others. Have you not seen placards where muslims openly display that Islam will dominate the world? I have mentioned it on other forums and will do so again: For me being religious and extremist is being mentally challenged.These people who weant to fight and kill for their god are simply sick. If you want to know more, islam was never mearnt to be outside of middle east. How else can you travel thousands of miles to perform the Hajj if there were no modern means of transport? Open your eyes a lil bit.
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by pro-all
Originally posted by pro-all
Muslims like you seem conveniently at ease leaving out the belligerent stance of your religion. I have never heard of Hindus or bhuddists wanting to impose their will on others. Have you not seen placards where muslims openly display that Islam will dominate the world? I have mentioned it on other forums and will do so again: For me being religious and extremist is being mentally challenged.These people who weant to fight and kill for their god are simply sick. If you want to know more, islam was never mearnt to be outside of middle east. How else can you travel thousands of miles to perform the Hajj if there were no modern means of transport? Open your eyes a lil bit.
Do you think that you never having heard of Hindus or Buddhists wanting to impose their will on others is because they don't, or because you simply haven't heard of it (because of your uninterest, or uninterest of media, or whatever)? Because just like there is a small minority of muslims who want to "impose their will on others" (although I've not seen any examples provided yet, except an unsubstantiated "all women in the UK wear burkhas" and a "they held up placards saying it"), there are minorities of Hindus and Buddhists too. I guess you've never heard of Burma? Or hindu extremism?
As far as Hajj goes, you realise there was this thing they invented about a century back called an "aeroplane"? And before that, there were ships. And when there was no water inbetween, people walked, or travelled as part of a caravan. Are you seriously suggesting that distance required to travel for Hajj is a reason that Islam is no longer applicable in the world today?
Because honestly, that's a very strange argument.edit on 19-4-2011 by babloyi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pro-all
I'm not prepared to engage you in circular arguments as it seems you've made up your mind of what to accept.
Originally posted by pro-all
But I'd like to see instances where the two other religions tried forcing outsiders into their fold. How ridiculous you bring Burma into the picture? How many people know of this place?
Originally posted by pro-all
"A small minority", thats always the excuse of muslims when they want to play their game of deceit. But you failed woefully this time. These extreme tendencies in islam are anchored in the Quran.
Originally posted by pro-all
How many centuries have islam existed before the aeroiplane was invented? And ships? Yes ships with sails that took years to make a voyage. Islam was a religion invented for the people in middle east. People living several thousands of miles away had no means ever to come to Mecca.