It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This image, based on variations in electrical conductivity of underground rock, shows the volcanic plume of partly molten rock that feeds the Yellowstone supervolcano. Yellow and red indicate higher conductivity, green and blue indicate lower conductivity. Made by University of Utah geophysicists and computer scientists, this is the first large-scale "geoelectric" image of the Yellowstone hotspot. Credit: University of Utah.
The image suggests the plume is even bigger than it appears in earlier images made with earthquake waves.
This illustration compares two views of the volcanic plume that feeds the supervolcano at Yellowstone National Park. The "geoelectric" image on the left is a new one based on variations in electrical conductivity of rock and fluids underground. It shows the plume dipping about 40 degrees to the west, and the method can only "see" the plume to a depth of about 200 miles. The more conventional seismic image on the right was made using earthquake waves. The seismic image shows the volcanic plume dipping 60 degrees to the west-northwest and the plume reaches a depth of at least 410 miles (this image doesn't go that deep). Together, the two images suggest then Yellowstone hotspot plume is bigger than had been thought based in the seismic image alone. Credit: University of Utah.
Smith says the geoelectric and seismic images of the Yellowstone plume look somewhat different because "we are imaging slightly different things." Seismic images highlight materials such as molten or partly molten rock that slow seismic waves, while the geoelectric image is sensitive to briny fluids that conduct electricity.
The lesser tilt of the geoelectric plume image raises the possibility that the seismically imaged plume, shaped somewhat like a tilted tornado, may be enveloped by a broader, underground sheath of partly molten rock and liquids, Zhdanov and Smith say.
Originally posted by SusanFrey
reply to post by TrueAmerican
They have lost their minds to allow any drilling there at all.
Originally posted by SusanFrey
I wish they would do those studies in Arkansas. LOL!!!!!
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Kinda funny actually. First they did the surveying and got an idea of the size. Then they do the seismic tomography, and discovered the plume was bigger than they thought. Now they do an electrical conductivity study and discover it is even bigger still than thought again.
So what's next? Got any more bright ideas?
Ha mistake. Yeah right mistake. That wouldn't even be classified as a mistake anymore if they literally royally screwed up and gave that kind of bomb an outlet to the top. It would be called gross criminal negligence that could cost untold amounts of lives and catastrophic destruction.
Originally posted by rinowilli
Originally posted by SusanFrey
reply to post by TrueAmerican
They have lost their minds to allow any drilling there at all.
I second that!
would make as much sense as throwing a live munitions round in a fire and expect it not to explode!.....IDIOTS!!
Originally posted by lifeform11
reply to post by kro32
are these the same experts that knew what they were doing whilst drilling in the gulf, or building power plants which accounted for common disasters for the area which it was built in ?
why take the risk? being wrong could spell the end. a big risk to take is'nt it.