It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ET cell study: origins & results

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 03:24 AM
link   
As I am tired, anyone is allowed to re-write my posts and publish them without distortion. I am not for fame. I am just a wretch unafraid to be put on the cross.The following are brief history and results of my studies on fossils:
Over 35 years ago I was a college student majoring in foreign languages and literature. I came to read “God's books” before graduation. I tried to live as “God” teaches. Then I became interested in ancient civilizations and tried to find, without final success, the lost continents of the Atlantis and Mu. Then I studied Jurassic dinosaur bones and published this article: "Dinosaurs had mammalian red blood cells."
wretchfossil.blogspot.com...

Then I studied human fossils of 300 million years ago and published these two articles:
1. "A human skull cap of 300 million years ago” wretchfossil.blogspot.com...
2."A human leg bone fossil of 300 million years ago"
wretchfossil.blogspot.com...

Then I studied NASA's microscopic images of Mars and published many posts in my websites. Then I studied meteorites and published this article:"A meteorite contains blood vessel remains."
wretchfossil.blogspot.com...

Finally, I study online micrographs only of meteorites rather than physical meteorites and published many posts in my websites at wretchfossil.blogspot.com... Up to this day, no one else publishes similar findings regarding animal fossil cells in meteorites. It's important to note differences between ET and Earthly animal fossil cells. The former can be found "in context" (within organs, tissues) but ET cells are often found out of context (not within organs, tissues).



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by linliangtai
As I am tired, anyone is allowed to re-write my posts and publish them without distortion. I am not for fame. I am just a wretch unafraid to be put on the cross.The following are brief history and results of my studies on fossils:
Over 35 years ago I was a college student majoring in foreign languages and literature. I came to read “God's books” before graduation. I tried to live as “God” teaches. Then I became interested in ancient civilizations and tried to find, without final success, the lost continents of the Atlantis and Mu. Then I studied Jurassic dinosaur bones and published this article: "Dinosaurs had mammalian red blood cells."
wretchfossil.blogspot.com...

Then I studied human fossils of 300 million years ago and published these two articles:
1. "A human skull cap of 300 million years ago” wretchfossil.blogspot.com...
2."A human leg bone fossil of 300 million years ago"
wretchfossil.blogspot.com...

Then I studied NASA's microscopic images of Mars and published many posts in my websites. Then I studied meteorites and published this article:"A meteorite contains blood vessel remains."
wretchfossil.blogspot.com...

Finally, I study online micrographs only of meteorites rather than physical meteorites and published many posts in my websites at wretchfossil.blogspot.com... Up to this day, no one else publishes similar findings regarding animal fossil cells in meteorites. It's important to note differences between ET and Earthly animal fossil cells. The former can be found "in context" (within organs, tissues) but ET cells are often found out of context (not within organs, tissues).


Wow, very interesting work you have done. it's allot to go through


Did NASA pay reporters to slander Richard Hoover and the Journal of Cosmology? Before the Hoover paper was published, JOC had repeatedly complained that NASA was providing funding to our competitors, and had paid a reporter to write an article for space.com and MSNBC which they published and which they plagiarized word-for-word from JOC.


You have really done your research man, S&F to you thanks for the link i've bookmarked your website so i can browse through the context!



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 07:22 AM
link   
reply to post by linliangtai
 


Hi Fossil Lin, welcome to ATS. Your research does indeed seem quite indepth and if proven correct, would certainly rewrite our history books.

Thanks to the links provided in your OP I have looked into some of your research here and here and while I must confess this is way out of my normal field, I can see you are quite passionate about your work.

Just a quick question.. Has anyone collected on the $10,000 bets you have made on various forums?

Get US$10,000 by falsifying this petrified limb on Mars

Get your US$10,000 by disproving this Mars fossil bone.

The only reason I ask is that here at ATS I'm sure someone would love to take you up on this challenge.



posted on Apr, 12 2011 @ 02:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Freelancer
 


For almost two years now, no one ever tried to disprove any of my above claims. In fact, less than 10 per cent of all of my posts were ever found incorrect. My findings are unarguable if they are more than 20 % correct.




top topics
 
6

log in

join