It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by steven704
Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by steven704
So since the arguments used against homosexuals is part of the old law...
i see what you mean and this is interesting. i guess the Lord would have the last say on this.
EDIT: OK, i've had to really think about this and really dig deep. The conclusion i came to is this.
If a person fully understands the disgust Our Father has with homosexuality in the old testament... even though searching for answers may not be in the New Testament on this particular matter.. Why would a homosexual want to play russian roulette with The Lord ??
Clearly He finds homosexuality an abomination..... therefore, my question would be to ' WHO ' are homosexuals attempting to slide by?
I don't think gay pride is a good enough reason to walk on coals. why play with fire.
edit on 12-4-2011 by steven704 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sirjunlegun
reply to post by IAMIAM
iamnotIAM I just love how you discourse through a volatile opinion as if you were Grand Marsha of the Rainbow Parade and then go on to say enough said as if you have the final word. Your opinion is nothing less than.passing judgement while you preach non-judgement. Hahaha nothing less than dubious when you can't find your way out of your head. BOO
No, i don't believe it's mind control. These people genuinely believe in the bible. If you believe in and follow a fundamental ancient document, you become fundamental. You woudn't want to anger the fundamental God besides.
dictionary.reference.com...
1.a person who has authority, control, or power over others; a master, chief, or ruler.
2. a person who exercises authority from property rights; an owner of land, houses, etc.
3. a person who is a leader or has great influence in a chosen profession: the great lords of banking.
4. a feudal superior; the proprietor of a manor.
5. a titled nobleman or peer; a person whose ordinary appellation contains by courtesy the title Lord or some higher title.
iamnotIAM I just love how you discourse through a volatile opinion as if you were Grand Marsha of the Rainbow Parade and then go on to say enough said as if you have the final word. Your opinion is nothing less than.passing judgement while you preach non-judgement. Hahaha nothing less than dubious when you can't find your way out of your head. BOO
Originally posted by DanUKphd
Yep, well said. I thought exactly the same as you yesterday when I read one of IAM's posts. I've got a question for IAM though: Just a straight question. I'm not being rude or mocking. I'm genuinely looking for the truth. With this thread being about Psy-ops and anti gay sentiment of the WBC I feel it's appropriate to ask this question - IAMIAM - are you gay? And if so, don't you think your views of the WBC are likely to be tainted and therefore a search for the truth about Psy-ops in this thread is stifled by opinions rather than facts?
No my friend, I am not gay in the way that you mean the word. I am gay in the traditional sense of the word though.
Psy-Ops are only effective if you allow others opinions to alter your own.
I love Gays, and I love the WBC. Neither are right, and neither are wrong.
Originally posted by DanUKphd
Matthew 5:37 "Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one"
Originally posted by DanUKphd
Psy-Ops are only effective if you allow others opinions to alter your own.
And your "opinion" is...
I love Gays, and I love the WBC. Neither are right, and neither are wrong.
Make your mind up. A few posts ago you were calling the WBC haters. You're just out here trying to derail this thread with gibberish none-sense.
Originally posted by DanUKphd
How about bringing hard evidence about Psy-ops to the table so we can find the truth.
How about you respond to the thread on topic how you see fit to respond on topic, and let others worry about how they will.
Originally posted by DanUKphd
reply to post by IAMIAM
How about you respond to the thread on topic how you see fit to respond on topic, and let others worry about how they will.
You seem to like telling others where to post, scroll up to the monkey video you posted on this page and read your own post where you direct people where to comment. Stop being a hypocrite.
Conspiracies in Religions: This forum is dedicated to the speculation and examination into conspiracies and scandals perpetrated or inspired by organized religions. This forum is not for the general discussion of religious topics. Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups. Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com's tradition of focusing on conspiracy theory, cover-ups, and scandals.
Matthew 5:37 "Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one"
Make your mind up. A few posts ago you were calling the WBC haters. You're just out here trying to derail this thread with gibberish none-sense.
My God Loves all for God IS all.
Your view of it is your own, and mine my own.
Originally posted by sirjunlegun
reply to post by Lazarus Short
You should make a thread detailing the MO of WBC. What you said is very interesting Lazurus Short.
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by awake_and_aware
Religion, in the way presented in most Christian churches, is a form of mind control. If you belong, and dress differently, grow your hair or beard long, have a lot of tattoos showing, drink a beer now and then, then you are shunned by the church.
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by lastrebel
He also came for people wearing mixed fabrics - I'm sure God will let you "Hell's Angels" off though.
hahahaha.