posted on Apr, 9 2011 @ 09:30 AM
reply to post by desert
It is a disgusting ploy. Natural options might not be as efficient, but they are sustainable and will not kill all your children, If the management
had of went this way, the improvements that would have occurred would have made natural energy very efficient, you know solar panel 3.2.1 would have
come around a lot quicker and possibly be talking 50 or 60 % efficiency or more, who knows.
Mans creativity and hunger for things can do amazing things, if as much research had of gone into the solar panel as has gone into Nuclear death
rubbish, we would not be having this discussion, instead sooner or later you get to watch you children's or their children's hair fall out due to
these type of poisons.
New Zealand should be very very proud, telling the American Nuclear dealers to go away and focusing on the one resource that they have a lot of,
thermal and wind energy. A+ to the Kiwis.
I do believe that there is a very small place for nuclear reactors, medicine and such, but not as a primary contingency to drive our power needs. The
World could have coped with a few small shared units for this type of thing, but not 400 plus mega death units, being driven for profit, by
unscrupulous #####.