Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court for 9/11

This is good. And a ``truther`` piece on Yahoo news? Nice.

Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11

NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine "Welt der Wunder," revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

And about the trial

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Gallop's case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

"No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks."

Also, that "it is not acceptable for a constitutional state...to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation," without first identifying suspects.

Dieseroth also said the U.S. "was under burden of proof" that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.

The trial was supposedly yesterday... anyone have more news on how it went? Or went to the trial in person?

I fail, it seems it was already posted.

This is what i think about it: www.youtube.com...

Btw, this has been posted several times. It's ridiculous! Are we all supposed to change our minds because yet another person didn't see the fuselage? Wake Up America!

Originally posted by TomServo
This is what i think about it: www.youtube.com...

Btw, this has been posted several times. It's ridiculous! Are we all supposed to change our minds because yet another person didn't see the fuselage? Wake Up America!

edit on 6-4-2011 by TomServo because: (no reason given)

You're wrong. See : The image at the pentagon

If the plane had just crashed and been turn into steam when it hit the wall, there wouldn't have been a big hole nor parts of the ``plane`` inside the Pentagon.

So your little video doesn't apply here.

Absolutely it does... this is a small fighter jet. it was a 747 that hit the pentagon. larger scale = more damage. this is simply an illustration to get people to understand that its possible that all parts disintegrated on impact. Just because a typical pea brain citizen walking the streets has never witnessed any similar events or tests, and therefore cannot imagine how this could physically happen does not mean that their assumptions are correct. This whole conspiracy is misguided by lack of technical knowledge. So until you obtain a mechanical engineering degree as i have, at least educate yourself.

Btw, your little image is not the core protective wall surrounding the pentagon. It is a flimsy little vernier wall.


Besides, where did that puny little punch out hole occur in relation to this image pulled from your same conspiracy site? 911research.wtc7.net...
The image you posted is probably a fake...

reply to post by TomServo


Its a pitty the Pentagon walls weren't made of the same concrete as in your video.
Maybe then it wouldn't have had to pass through rings A,B,C,D and E to vapourize.
Now thats ridiculous!

April Gallop was right there, she saw nothing...nothing!

reply to post by Sherlock2009

Could it be possible that A + B + C + D + E = 15 ft thick concrete? Think Holmes, Think!

reply to post by TomServo


There was no imovable object like in your video, its office space for christs sake.
You cant add all the walls together to make you answer viable, that's clutching at straws.

Originally posted by TomServo
Absolutely it does... this is a small fighter jet. it was a 747...

A 747, huh? OK. If you cannot apply the very simple attention to detail necessary to even get the freaking aircraft right at this stage of the game, you can go ahead on your way and please do not be surprised if nobody gives a hoot what you say.

Originally posted by TomServo

Besides, where did that puny little punch out hole occur in relation to this image pulled from your same conspiracy site? 911research.wtc7.net...


The image you posted is probably a fake...

edit on 6-4-2011 by TomServo because: (no reason given)

No, the image is real. But, it is the innermost ring of the Pentagon. I don't recall which one exactly, but IIRC, It was in the B ring corridor.