reply to post by AlexIR
That entire post only goes further to prove my points.
You keep on talking about taking action against the NWO, as does a large part of this entire board, but rarely give explanations as to how this is to
be accomplished in a successful and productive manner. Spray painting graffiti telling people to fight the NWO? Assuming it isn't washed off, most
people would ignore it as "some crazy people doing crazy things". Making videos on Youtube? Assuming those aren't pulled off for some bull# reason (I
can see it now: "It violates DMCA"), it is highly unlikely they will make any impact whatsoever. An Anti-NWO video usually has give or take 2,000
views, while Rebecca Black's Friday (which in my opinion, is an absolutely horrible song that only highlights how low the music industry is ready to
go) song has 88 million or so views.
All I'm doing is noticing how unproductive threads such as these are. We constantly talk and post about what the NWO is doing, who they are, how they
plan to oppress us, etc. But we usually fail to go further than just that. And in the few occasions we do get an idea out, simple logic shows how
easily it can be undone. I just in the last post how going public and declaring an anti-NWO group could be suicide. Well then, if you're so sure of
yourself, go ahead. Go out and declare to the NWO that you are here, and that you know about them. It's the equivalent as to charing into the middle
of a battlefield with guns going off all around you. They'll find some way to bring you down faster than you can blink. If they can't charge you with
something, they'll make something up, or maybe just tag you as minor potential threat, and monitor you. Why not? Who says they can't? Who says they
aren't most likely monitoring you right in some way right now? After all, we are frequent posters on the Internet's biggest conspiracy website. They
probably have our IP addresses, along with all our posts, logged somewhere in case they need them.
As for denying slander? I'm sure that will work; just like the US government denies it's in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya, for the oil. Hell, it's
worse for us; we don't control the media. They do. I can see half the nation's pundits and news outlets discrediting, then making fun out of us in
some way or another, while the other half simply ignore us.
All I've done is propose a few things we can feasibly do. You seem to believe petitions and public campaigns do squat. On the contrary, they are quite
successful. For example: The Brazilian "clean record" law was a bold proposal that banned any politician convicted of crimes like corruption and
money laundering from running for office. With nearly 25% of their Congress under investigation for corruption, such a bill would normally be
impossible to pass. Corrupt politicians who exploit the people for their own benefit would remain in power. In response, Avaaz.org launched the
largest online campaign in Brazilian history, helping to build a petition of over 2 million signatures, 500,000 online actions, and tens of thousands
of phone calls. They fought corrupt congressmen daily as they tried every trick in the book to kill, delay, amend, and weaken the bill. They lost. The
bill eventually passed Congress. As we speak, many corrupt politicians are being kicked out. I don't know about you, but I good to have actually
gotten SOMETHING done rather than just continuously posting here. If you want to read about other such victories, here's a link:
www.avaaz.org...
As for your comment about Anonymous, you seem to be out of touch with recent news. Anyone can DDOS. But they hacked into HBGary, a technology security
company. Yes, this is one of those big and "important" IT companies that assists the US government in technical manners. These are the guys that are
supposed to be untouchable, and the hardest to break into.
You know what Anonymous did? On February 5-6th of this year, Anonymous hacked the company website, copied tens of thousands of documents from HBGary,
posted tens of thousands of company e-mails online, and usurped the CEO's Twitter account. Oh, and they allegedly wiped his iPad (:lol
, though it
was never confirmed. They even came out and gave a step-by-step explanation as to how they did it. I can only understand parts of it, but enough to
get the message: that some of these guys are serious pros when it comes to computer hacking. Here's the link to the story:
arstechnica.com...
Oh, and they got information. Loads of it: They unveiled an entire plot by HBGary Federal, Bank of America, Palantir Technologies, Berico
Technologies, and the law firm Hunton & Williams (Recommended to Bank of America by US Justice Department) to launch a dirty campaign against
Wikileaks (Bank of America is nervous about them, so that pretty much confirms they have a lot of dirty laundry) that included proposals to fabricate
"false documents", "proactive tactics against WikiLeaks include feeding the fuel between the feuding groups, disinformation, creating messages around
actions to sabotage or discredit the opposing organization, and submitting fake documents to WikiLeaks and then calling out the error." Oh, and
blackmailing a journalist. You can read up on all that here:
www.thetechherald.com...
Anonymous also found that HBGary was involved with a separate plot with the US Chamber of Commerece to spy on and discredit unions and progressive
groups. More on that here:
emptywheel.firedoglake.com...
The hacked e-mails revealed even MORE interesting information: HBGary Federal was contracted by the U.S. government to develop astroturfing software
which could create an "army" of multiple fake social media profiles to manipulate and sway public opinion on controversial issues. Also, HBGary was
working on the development of a new type of Windows rootkit (some sort of spying software), code named Magenta, that would be "undetectable" and
"almost impossible to remove.
You wanted Anonymous to hack for information? There it is.
Lastly, as for the teenager bit, I only stated that your behavior is that similar to teenager who posts here merely to feel cool about it, or such
reasoning. I never implied that you were actually a teenager; how the hell would I even know that?
Though, judging on your reaction to that, it looks like my opinion was closer to home than I expected.
edit on 7-4-2011 by Oberlin because:
Minor edits and spelling mistakes; my G-d, I have to work on making shorter posts.