Incredible UFO Footage over Bogota

Originally posted by survival

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147

Originally posted by MiTS1965
In the 2nd video you can clearly see the light on the right land on a runway. You can even see the runway lights! You can even see another light taxiing on the ground!

Amazing, isn't it. This is what we're up against...

And people wonder why Ufology isn't taken seriously.

you seem to have already depicted these guys as enemies. have you ever conversed with one?

You mean an aeroplane pilot? Yes, I have. He was a nice guy.

reply to post by Blue Shift

I agree and strongly disagree.

The first video immediately throws your conclusion out the window. The speed at which the "UFO's" change course would have thrown any passenger on board out of their seat. It moved far too suddenly for your explanation.

The second video is a possibility, though I am still sceptical about your given explanation. I see no flashing lights and no change in colour tones like a standard commercial aircraft.

I drive past Heathrow on my way to work every day, I see planes waiting to land but never in a formation like this. Also, you can see a commercial aircrafts lights flashing even when its 30,000ft in the air. Why can’t we see the lights flash on these?


reply to post by MiTS1965

Care to point this out? I can't see what you’re talking about in the slightest.

Even at a great distance you would notice a flicker in the lights and a change of colour tone. Neither of which appear in either videos. Again, the first video throws your explanation out the window.


reply to post by FOXMULDER147

Indeed, though don’t forget we need people like this. Without someone constantly bashing our claims how do we know we are staying on the right track or even staying sane?

Keep the discussion and thread on-topic please guys.

Lights in thye sky, again. At the very least a pic or vid ought to be taken in the daylight from the exact same location. Is that a hill behind the city? Are those lights staionary? Wasn't it a gal named Roxanne on YouTube that took a bunch of pictures of car lights coming down a hill across from her apartment and insisted they were UFOs. I mean, we need a little analysis here rather than jumping to the conclusion that they are inter-dimensional. All you're showing here is good imaginations.

Originally posted by TristanC

reply to post by MiTS1965

 

Care to point this out? I can't see what you’re talking about in the slightest.

Even at a great distance you would notice a flicker in the lights and a change of colour tone. Neither of which appear in either videos. Again, the first video throws your explanation out the window.

Go to 1'30" in the 2nd video. See the three bright lights? Watch the one at the lower right as it descends and lands on two parallel rows of lights. Its an airplane landing on a runway. How anyone can see anything other than that is beyond me!

Look, I realise you want it to be something more than what it is but at some point you really have to admit that they are merely airplanes.

And the lights are flickering! Why can't you see this??? The planes are so distant that the camera cannot differentiate between headlights and nav lights.

reply to post by TristanC


i wouldn't go so far as to say that you should find another hobby, because lord knows being passionate about your craft is a major plus, but maybe you should hone your skills before bestowing the title of "Video Analyzer" upon yourself.

If you drive past an airport everyday, and you've never seen planes stand in such a formation, you should stop a little longer, and look a little harder.

Also, the luminosity of the headlamps on a commercial aircraft completely drown out the tiny lights coming from the rest of the aircraft. There are landing lights and taxi lights, both of which are on when most commercial aircraft's landing gear is down. It isn't until the plane turns away from your 'face to face' point of view that you can see it's Nav lights.

Believe me, i've fallen for this same thing before. Even shot my own "UFO video". Of course, my own video was never posted because i realized, as soon as the PLANE adjusted it's angle, and left me feeling duped. It was the first and last time i would be duped by an airplane.

My advice to you is to cuddle up to one of the master analyzers here at ATS, if this is truly what you want to do, and try to absorb as much information as possible.

Apologies for the missing hyperlink on my OP, won’t happen again!

reply to post by MiTS1965

reply to post by Blue Shift

reply to post by FOXMULDER147


I haven’t been clear about how I presented my previous post, sorry. I made that to start the discussion which I was going to go back to and edit when i finish work then use my arguments (which i think from a video analysis PoV would be the most common arguments used) against your posts and add my video analysis below them. I used reply to person for a hard reference of the post. Sadly, i didn’t finish work early enough to edit it within the allocated time - which i was unaware of.

I will still be analysing the videos and posting examples just so others that are not so convinced can have a closed conclusion.

reply to post by OneEleven

Oh man, that hurt! Ha-ha - Don’t worry I was not clear regarding my previous post. Though I ask you to not judge my skills by this mistaken argument! Point taken on the signature though, bit OTT!

reply to post by TristanC


i must say, your response to my lashing (it wasn't a lashing really) is VERY uncommon here at ATS, and demonstrates your level headedness.

Most here would either curl up in a ball, or come back with childish argument after childish excuse about why they're right, and what sort of expert they are.

Kudos for that.

S&F for your videos of airplanes.

Looks like Chinese Lanterns
www.shropshirestar.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

People are always mistaken by them.

It sucks because I am always let down by this. Very rarely do I ever find a REALLY GOOD video.

It's always the Triangle.

It's such a let down.