It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Girl that predicted Japan EQ says California is next on 31 march - get out!!!

page: 23
96
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
Thanks Antar, im around here and there I just had to make my go at this thread, hahaha



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by rttw00
Hi! I'm new here


I got these images from nasa.gov and let's take a look at some of these Elenin alignments.


Feb 27...Chile earthquake

Elenin - Earth - Sun perfect alignment


March 11....Japan earthquake

Not a really perfect alignment but close. Actually, a better alignment would be March 13-14.


I also checked the Haiti earthquake which occurred on Jan 12, 2010. There was no elenin-earth alignment but....

There was an Elenin - Sun - Jupiter alignment.


On March 31...

Earth is not involved but Elenin - Sun - Mars looks kinda aligned. The perfect Elenin - Sun - Mars alignment will occur on Apr 7. Well, let's see if something big will happen during the 1st week of April.


Feb 22, 2011 (New Zealand earthquake). Elenin was not aligned with anything tho...

edit on 29-3-2011 by rttw00 because: (no reason given)


I'll say this again for old times sake. Comet Elenin was not discovered until Dec 2010. The Earthquake that hit Chili was Feb 27, 2010, 10 months before the comet was discovered.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by grandmarkai
Why take a chance on whether it's right or wrong prediction? There is sound science behind at least the theory that these celestial bodies are creating disturbances on Earth. So on the 31st of March you leave Cali, and nothing happens. Opps, you just accidentally went on vacation. Uh-oh, there is a massive earthquake. You don't join the thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of dead.

I think most people on here can at least come to the consensus that there is "something" going on in our solar system involving seemingly "unknown" celestial bodies. Whether it is the brown dwarf binary star (my personal belief), the dwarf star along with 5 planetoids, the comet ELEnin, etc. Add this to the interesting behavior of our main sun, and the official government story starts to fall apart.


Sorry but there is absolutly no science involved in these predictions no matter how planets and comets line up in the sky. Comets cannot have any effect on EQ or pole shifts or magnetic fields around the earth. They just dont have the mass needed to create any kind of gravitational pull. And if gravity from a passing body could cause EQ's why doesnt the moon just pull us apart. Oh thats right its not strong enough and its way way bigger than elenin.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by karen61057
 


Just because they discovered it in December, doesn't mean it didn't exist to have the effects on earth. Your comment was very unintelligent.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by KonigKaos
I doubt she is right, this is just her farewell from Youtube, she will return one day with a new character under a different name.

Everything major and possibly exciting in a Global Event never happens. EQ are norm all major fault lines will eventually have the big quake. California is due for it and its been that way for many years.


Overall I think we just must wait for THursday


Thursday = 8 March= 3 8+3= 11 WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Numbers match up 11 special number hahahahahaa

March 31 31 flipped around is 13 a sacred number damn im gettin good hahahaha I can go on with this lol


Look at the hidden meanings which contain the date of the Japan Tsunami/EQ/Reactor Melt Down:

ufoetblog.com...



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Foppezao
I ve just been reading Nostradamus again. Century IV, Quatrain 67

" A very bright, previously unkown comet will apear and coincide with the time of great geological troubles, with earthquakes and volcanoes erupting and disrupting weather systems....Nations that are considered prosperous and powerful, particulary western nations will be weakened..."

Nostradamus code...Micheal Rathford..


Well this one will not be all that bright from what I've read about it. Hale-Bopp back in 95 was very bright. It was the first comet I've ever seen with my own eyes and it was quite a site in the night sky. I live on the east coast of the US. I saw it twice during that year.For several days in April when it was headed toward the sun and again in November on its way out of the solar system back to where ever it goes. It was previously unknown having an orbit of about 2000 years. But in 95 I think the biggest quake was about 7.4 in Mexico.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by wrkn4livn

Originally posted by ag893
Reply to post by Tollon
 


What I don't understand is why she said she's going to the mountains? If there was a large earthquake coming, why would she chose to go there?! I would be getting out of state if I were her. Also, wouldn't the animals statewide start acting up by now if the earthquake was 3 days away? Usually they begin at least a week or two ahead of time.
 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 
If it's as big as the 9.0 it could create a wave that will go out to Pasadena. The foothills (4000-5000 feet) sounds better then doesn't it?





If it's as big as the 9.0 it could create a wave that will go out to Pasadena. The foothills (4000-5000 feet) sounds better then doesn't it?





Sorry but the San andreas is not a Tsunami producing fault. It lies under the land, not the ocean. Plus it is a slip fault and the experts do not feel that it is capable of a quake bigger than 8.0 in any event. Not that 8.0 is not bad. It is and it would cause massive amounts of damage in the area it struck but no dear no tsunami from San Andreas. Now if there is one on the Cascadia subduction zone you could have water in Washington State, Oregon and California as Cascadia is underwater. It is not a fault it is where two tectonic plates meet.

edit on 29-3-2011 by karen61057 because: to fix.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Techata
reply to post by DantesPeak
 


The Moon balances the earth in her rotation and orbit, introducing another body into the balace obviously throws it off. Agreed a 4km asteroid prob not big enough to disturb old mother earth, but could definatley see it causing some type of unrest within our delicate system.


The moon is a satellite of earth. It does nothing to balance our rotation and orbit and as a matter of fact the moon is slowly moving away from earth. One day it will escape our gravitational pull on it and say bye bye to us. Someday the earth will not have a moon but for now its a nice little light in the night sky and its gravity effects our oceans only. Not our place in the solar system. The Sun does that job.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2012TheEnd
reply to post by karen61057
 


Just because they discovered it in December, doesn't mean it didn't exist to have the effects on earth. Your comment was very unintelligent


Well there you go. You got me. Of course it did exist before it was discovered. But its a comet and its mass is very very small. It does not have the mass needed to have gravity enough to effect anything at all. So no matter where it was before it was discovered it didnt have anything to do with the earthquakes on the chart. Nothing at all. It cannot. Its impossible. Period end of report. Is this a more intelligent comment for you?



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by 2012TheEnd
reply to post by karen61057
 


Just because they discovered it in December, doesn't mean it didn't exist to have the effects on earth. Your comment was very unintelligent


Well there you go. You got me. Of course it did exist before it was discovered. But its a comet and its mass is very very small. It does not have the mass needed to have gravity enough to effect anything at all. So no matter where it was before it was discovered it didnt have anything to do with the earthquakes on the chart. Nothing at all. It cannot. Its impossible. Period end of report. Is this a more intelligent comment for you?

edit on 29-3-2011 by Nervoso because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 05:57 PM
link   
Could you please present your proof/numbers that show it cannot have an effect? I'm interested to know.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:05 PM
link   
comet EXISTED before discovery, you can backtrack an orbit once you know it
edit on 29-3-2011 by ufoinquirer because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nervoso
Could you please present your proof/numbers that show it cannot have an effect? I'm interested to know.


Gravity is produced by mass. Our planet has more gravity than the moon because it is larger. Jupiter has more gravity than earth because it is larger. A comet that is only 4 km wide has very little mass when compared to a planet. The following website should help you to understand what I am saying. Good luck. Hope this helps !



edmall.gsfc.nasa.gov...



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by grandmarkai
Why take a chance on whether it's right or wrong prediction? There is sound science behind at least the theory that these celestial bodies are creating disturbances on Earth. So on the 31st of March you leave Cali, and nothing happens. Opps, you just accidentally went on vacation. Uh-oh, there is a massive earthquake. You don't join the thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of dead.

I think most people on here can at least come to the consensus that there is "something" going on in our solar system involving seemingly "unknown" celestial bodies. Whether it is the brown dwarf binary star (my personal belief), the dwarf star along with 5 planetoids, the comet ELEnin, etc. Add this to the interesting behavior of our main sun, and the official government story starts to fall apart.


Sorry but there is absolutly no science involved in these predictions no matter how planets and comets line up in the sky. Comets cannot have any effect on EQ or pole shifts or magnetic fields around the earth. They just dont have the mass needed to create any kind of gravitational pull. And if gravity from a passing body could cause EQ's why doesnt the moon just pull us apart. Oh thats right its not strong enough and its way way bigger than elenin.


when you see striking obvious correlations throughout history and in front of your eyes, the proper reaction is to question...not to say there's nothing there, move on . we still have many things about space, time, all that stuff, to learn, and these are clues to new breakthroughs. you don't have to agree, but just nay saying is, well, just nay saying

maybe there is more to it than you realize, considering only a few human beings have ever been into space



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by Nervoso
Could you please present your proof/numbers that show it cannot have an effect? I'm interested to know.


Gravity is produced by mass. Our planet has more gravity than the moon because it is larger. Jupiter has more gravity than earth because it is larger. A comet that is only 4 km wide has very little mass when compared to a planet. The following website should help you to understand what I am saying. Good luck. Hope this helps !



edmall.gsfc.nasa.gov...


and couldn't, honestly don't know, one larger mass pull in a smaller mass very easily that could still have catastrophic effects on said planet?

honestly asking



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by NightGypsy
Well, there's a prediction that already didn't come true.....so the rest we take with a grain of salt.


That's from that man called Turi, who has nothing to do with Ed Dames, and his remote viewers.

I posted the predictions from Turi because he did the predictions on coast to coast after Ed Dames.
edit on 29-3-2011 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   
There is now a Comet Honda headed our way as well during the same time that elenin is...



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:12 PM
link   
reply to post by sinohptik
 


That may very well be. I hadn't actually thought of that (that she might just be so genuinely concerned and trying to get her loved ones out through this.)

My main point is what you said though: there's no basis - that I or you can see - for the prediction that a quake will take place on the 31st. There's a circumstantial basis for a link to the 11th, but that same circumstantial basis failed to produce an event on the 21st. My only conclusion can be that, barring other evidence (which is always possible; one always has to remain open to possibilities imo,) the prediction for a quake on the 31st is baseless, unless I'm completely missing something.

Again, that isn't me asserting that nothing will happen on the 31st. It's just a challenge to the idea of an Elenin-Earth-sun alignment having any sort of consistently proven affect on quake probability. There doesn't appear to be one so far.



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by Nervoso
Could you please present your proof/numbers that show it cannot have an effect? I'm interested to know.


Gravity is produced by mass. Our planet has more gravity than the moon because it is larger. Jupiter has more gravity than earth because it is larger. A comet that is only 4 km wide has very little mass when compared to a planet. The following website should help you to understand what I am saying. Good luck. Hope this helps !



edmall.gsfc.nasa.gov...


Do you know the mass of that comet?



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Matthew Dark
 


Besides, if you watch some of her other videos, she states that she talks to jesus and whatnot.
Not a good way to seem legitimate.


Only if she says that Jesus talks back to her. Lots of sane people talk to Jesus.



new topics

top topics



 
96
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join