It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KJV1611
reply to post by shroudnews77
This is obviously not Jesus since his toes were ripped off:
Originally posted by shroudnews77
reply to post by gimme_some_truth
Ruello is revealing actual skin on the face and body how can it be an art piece
Originally posted by shroudnews77
reply to post by KJV1611
Bones were not broken toes were torn ripped from tendons the prophecy still applies
Originally posted by JoshNorton
From what I've heard, the carbon dating on the shroud puts it more in line with the time of the Templars. Likewise, the first verifiable owner was the wife of the nephew of Jacques de Molay's right hand man in the Templars. And portraits of de Molay seem to match the face on the shroud fairly well.
Not conclusive evidence, but enough circumstantial to make it plausible, in my mind at least.