Anti-Gaddafi plot conceived in Paris – Voltaire Network

Anti-Gaddafi plot conceived in Paris – Voltaire Network

rt.com

Thierry Meyssan, a political analyst and founder of the international NGO Voltaire Network, explained in an interview with RT that the French and British had been preparing the operation in Libya since November 2010, and that the stakes were high.
­“Sarkozy was in big trouble with [the Libyan leader Muammar] Gaddafi because he [Gaddafi] cancelled a huge contract they signed together four years ago for Rafael fighters and a lot of nuclear [power] plants,” Meyssan said.
The situation turned against Gaddafi when his ex-chief of protocol, Nouri Massoud El-Mesmari, defected in October and we

(visit the link for the full news article)

This is an extremely interesting news article, with many important accusations. Has anyone ever stopped for a secound and thought, why did France want to intervene in Libya so badly? Do not let it be mistaken, France has alot to gain from the distruction of the Qaddafi regime. It is evident that this is no humanitarian mission. This is about regime change.

“He is now under the protection of French secret services, and [he] proposed to the French to organize an uprising in Benghazi and to overthrow Gaddafi,” Meyssan continued. “The French asked the British to co-create a military expeditionary force, and it was signed between [them] on November 2.”

“And you can verify that because the French military was asked to perform a big exercise with the British called Southern Mistral. And this military exercise is in fact exactly what is happening now, with the same people and the same strategy,” Thierry Meyssan concluded.

If we could verify the credibility of this information, then this could be the biggest news surrounding the conflict.

rt.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

reply to post by SpeachM1litant


I generally really like rt, but I'm not so sure they got it right this time.

The article is very interesting, and Meyssan seems to lined up all his ducks, but then again that's what he does. He is a conspiracy author and isn't privy to any information you or I wouldn't be able to locate in the papers or on the news.

I definitely think it's something to look into, I just take Meyssan with a grain of salt.

Originally posted by searching4truth
reply to post by SpeachM1litant

 

I generally really like rt, but I'm not so sure they got it right this time.

The article is very interesting, and Meyssan seems to lined up all his ducks, but then again that's what he does. He is a conspiracy author and isn't privy to any information you or I wouldn't be able to locate in the papers or on the news.

I definitely think it's something to look into, I just take Meyssan with a grain of salt.

I generally really like rt, but I'm not so sure they got it right this time.

Why not because there russian and not western news? you think CNN or BBC would be fair in broadcasting like this?

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Why not because there russian and not western news? you think CNN or BBC would be fair in broadcasting like this?

How did you come to that conclusion? Just for clarification, I watch RT more than other typical "western" news stations.

My issue with this particular story is their source, not the channel. I thought I was fairly clear about that, well, if not there you go.