posted on Jul, 22 2004 @ 11:25 AM
Deep, I agree it is a neat idea about the protective clothing, but chipping the clothes, like chipping a person, just is too close to big brother
stuff for me, personally. I do understand, looking at your avatar, that you have or know someone with a child, your desire to protect them, I really
do. My problem is in my opinion that it would end up, very fast, being abused by the US government. Don't think so, here is a perfect example of
it. General Motors offers "onstar" on lots of its vehicles. It is both a �GPS� and 2 way communication systems.
Well, it seems, I predicted this the first time I saw it advertised, that the FBI was sued by someone because the FBI used that system to track and
listen in on conversation in the car. The case was thrown out of court, but right after that a law was passed that allows government agencies to do
that without even getting a warrant. It is my personal opinion that this would happen with chipped persons or even chipped clothes.
Deep, please understand I am very against this issue, not you for your opinion or article.