Hacker group vows 'cyberwar' on US government, business

He might be a honeypot waiting. (He's Winnie the Pooh!)

I'd be careful with the [snip]

Best way to get at him would probably be his already online public info....aka legally.




Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.

Originally posted by aivlas
reply to post by Expunged

 

I've made my own decision see the other thread and where is leader coming from?

There is no leader, don't you get it? Visit the URL I provided above. Your continued ignorance will be ignored.

reply to post by Expunged


Right but what has that got to do with the story? he never said he was a leader.

Originally posted by hadriana
He might be a honeypot waiting. (He's Winnie the Pooh!)

Best way to get at him would probably be his already online public info....aka legally.

This site isn't as secure as you think.

reply to post by Expunged


Underage people interested in computer security will know exactly what I mean.
My statement was urging caution in attacking Barrett and suggesting it be done legally.

Why would you threaten me over THAT?

Originally posted by hadriana
reply to post by Expunged

 

Underage people interested in computer security will know exactly what I mean.
My statement was urging caution in attacking Barrett and suggesting it be done legally.

Why would you threaten me over THAT?

I didn't threaten you. That would be abhorrent! Sacrilege!

Pesky remote DB connections - always getting in the way of RL.

I'm going to bed.

The thread topic is: Hacker group vows 'cyberwar' on US government, business

Please adhere to the topic and avoid discussing one another.

Thank you,

Hefficide
ATS Member and moderator.

How many "hackers" have tried to seek war on our Gov. my guess is at least a million, it's funny this topic got so big, do these guys seriously think that the Gov. doesn't have computer savvy individuals on their side? it'll be fun to watch the outcome of this so called "cyberwar."

I estimate it will be done with in one month, haha

The thread is a dupe that provides no new info than the other one, it would seem that modding individual posts is pointless.

reply to post by EL1A5

There will be no such cyberwar. This guy doesn't have Anon's backing.
Second line

reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman


If you say trust no one you nut job why the hell should I trust you?

Originally posted by DuceizBack
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman

 

If you say trust no one you nut job why the hell should I trust you?

You can. But you don't have to.

You can trust anyone(including Megacorp news, government sources etc) or choice not to.

But for the most part. Trust no one unless what they say/show is proven with your own eyes personally.

A leader of the computer hackers group known as Anonymous

"Barrett Brown, 29, who calls himself a senior strategist and 'propagandist' for Anonymous."

Those two statements sound like quite a stretch.

reply to post by HardbeatAcolyte


There may not be no cyberwar from the real anon but there will be a cyberwar from the fake anon.Thats the danger of being anon anybody cab be anon including false flaggers,anon has been compromised there is no more anon its done.

Anon will be no more as you have been infiltrated by agent provocatuers and will be fractured because of it,dont know how you'll clean it up anon but anon is no longer anon. Stay frosty.

reply to post by EnhancedInterrogator


Why have loads of you latched on to the person who wrote the article calling him a leader are you all that dense (sorry but it has to be said) and surely anyone who helps with choosing targets etc is a strategist. Now if you all go and do some reading you will notice the same names again and again in this latest anon action.

ATS nice work blocking my ip