It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by hippomchippo
Plug the word HAARP and earthquakes into Google.
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by CIGGSofWAR
And maybe I don't, how about you just wait till they use it on you and see if you take time to decide what it is called?
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by redtic
Oh man I give up ... you guys have not heard of HAARP?
I guess you will think it a coincidence that the top seismologists where running around here in a non earthquake zone of New Zealand before the huge September quake and that FEMA officials were here at the time of this latest quake ... just a coincidence I image?
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by badw0lf
For goodness sake, I am saying that two quakes go off at once and so a huge force meets up with another huge force and collide and of course what you say about quakes in general is true...
Is this really the level of intelligence on this site?
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by hippomchippo
Why don't you come here and look for yourselves or view the images of the destruction, remember this place is very well build and it twisted and broke structures designed to withstand an 8 quake and they are all broken. This quake was supposedly only one 6.3 quake.
But never fear, I am sure you will get your turn soon ...
edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: double word
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by AprilSky
If you had come to the table with a patent for such a device, or some supporting documentation - such as an article from a peer reviewed journal that supported the potential of such a device, then the questions would be directed towards the evidence presented. As it stands you've tabled a theory and, as such, it is normal and good that people would want a description of the theorized mechanism and process of earthquake generation/control.
There is nothing wrong with tabling ideas in the manner done here. It is a great way to start dialogue and discussion. But one cannot be upset when that dialogue trends towards a discussion of the science involved in such ideas.
~Heff
Originally posted by AprilSky
We already know here it was much greater in effect than a 6.3, it had the effect of a 8 or 9 quake but the damage was restricted to a fairly small area. The explanation so far has included the waves banging into each other but what they have told us is the hills reflected the quake back on itself and doubled the effect in the death zone.
Originally posted by debris765nju
you make the claim that the elite have this technology and that they are using it against n.z.
who are these elite? where are they doing this? how are they doing it? why are they doing it? how did you find out? have you reported it?
just asking?
Originally posted by AprilSky
Originally posted by debris765nju
you make the claim that the elite have this technology and that they are using it against n.z.
who are these elite? where are they doing this? how are they doing it? why are they doing it? how did you find out? have you reported it?
just asking?
The things that make this seem like an elite event is that they were here before and at the time of our 7.1 quake and they were here and whisked away one hour before this latest quake.
It does not take a genius to work out they never spend time here in New Zealand and their presence is beyond suspicious!
The US was also doing exercises just of the coast, we are lucky to see the US navy ever but they just happened to be here doing exercises with us?edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: spelling
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by badw0lf
For goodness sake, I am saying that two quakes go off at once and so a huge force meets up with another huge force and collide and of course what you say about quakes in general is true...
Is this really the level of intelligence on this site?