It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BrianDamage
I don't see where the "ghost" conclusion comes from.
I looks like a puff of smoke, or dust.
I know that smoke and dust can't pass through glass.
It's certainly intriguing, but I can't help but err on the side of hoax.
Some background story would be a start.
Good post either way.
Originally posted by DeltaGhostHunter
reply to post by Aliensun
Look at the very begining of the vid, It looks as if they are in a Alley. I dont see a car pass the girl. Also when the face appears, if that was a car, why dosent it continue? would liketo see exact local.
Originally posted by wideawake20
Originally posted by BrianDamage
I don't see where the "ghost" conclusion comes from.
I looks like a puff of smoke, or dust.
I know that smoke and dust can't pass through glass.
It's certainly intriguing, but I can't help but err on the side of hoax.
Some background story would be a start.
Good post either way.
Man I know Im newer here but I really feel like the skeptics on here(atleast about some topics) theyre conclusions seem more bizarre than a ghost or spirit, Which I do beleive in to an extent but the fact is if it cant be explained either way it shouldent be considered a hoax in this case a spirit captured on film seems more likely then two weirdos who thought of such an extremily vague image of what can barely be detirmined as a spirit if you ask me a hoaxer could make much better ghosts then a magic puff of smoke but what do I know
Originally posted by BrianDamage
Originally posted by wideawake20
Originally posted by BrianDamage
I don't see where the "ghost" conclusion comes from.
I looks like a puff of smoke, or dust.
I know that smoke and dust can't pass through glass.
It's certainly intriguing, but I can't help but err on the side of hoax.
Some background story would be a start.
Good post either way.
Man I know Im newer here but I really feel like the skeptics on here(atleast about some topics) theyre conclusions seem more bizarre than a ghost or spirit, Which I do beleive in to an extent but the fact is if it cant be explained either way it shouldent be considered a hoax in this case a spirit captured on film seems more likely then two weirdos who thought of such an extremily vague image of what can barely be detirmined as a spirit if you ask me a hoaxer could make much better ghosts then a magic puff of smoke but what do I know
There is plenty of scientific evidence about the existance of smoke, dust and hoaxers.
There is no scientific evidence of ghosts or spirits. (yet).
In most cases, the most obvious answer is usually the correct answer.
Most skeptics on here are not just being killjoys, they are looking for the truth, just because someone wants to believe in something does not make it's exsistance all the more probable.
Deny Ignorance.
Originally posted by old_god
Someone threw rice or similar at the kid
Originally posted by Enter Ruin
Originally posted by BrianDamage
Originally posted by wideawake20
Originally posted by BrianDamage
I don't see where the "ghost" conclusion comes from.
I looks like a puff of smoke, or dust.
I know that smoke and dust can't pass through glass.
It's certainly intriguing, but I can't help but err on the side of hoax.
Some background story would be a start.
Good post either way.
Man I know Im newer here but I really feel like the skeptics on here(atleast about some topics) theyre conclusions seem more bizarre than a ghost or spirit, Which I do beleive in to an extent but the fact is if it cant be explained either way it shouldent be considered a hoax in this case a spirit captured on film seems more likely then two weirdos who thought of such an extremily vague image of what can barely be detirmined as a spirit if you ask me a hoaxer could make much better ghosts then a magic puff of smoke but what do I know
There is plenty of scientific evidence about the existance of smoke, dust and hoaxers.
There is no scientific evidence of ghosts or spirits. (yet).
In most cases, the most obvious answer is usually the correct answer.
Most skeptics on here are not just being killjoys, they are looking for the truth, just because someone wants to believe in something does not make it's exsistance all the more probable.
Deny Ignorance.
history tells us scientists are wrong most of the time, and even their conclusions, theories, etc are often changed or modified. What you believe now could be wrong. Just take a look at history of humans and what crazy thoughts "scientists" had back then... what makes you think they are right this time? Just saying...edit on 9-3-2011 by Enter Ruin because: (no reason given)