It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jasonkrice Because our Solar System does not exist in the Cosmos
Originally posted by optimus primal
reply to post by backinblack
it's not considered a vital mission. to us it is. hell to me it is. but not to the appropriations committee. lets not all forget that it's the government that funds nasa, and right now they're tightening the purse strings on what they dole out to them.
Originally posted by optimus primal
reply to post by backinblack
there's a point where paranoia just becomes silly. i think you've reached it.
400,000 dollars may seem like chump change within a budget of 17 billion, however it's really not. listen, i'm not defending all the reign tightening that the government is doing to nasa. just pointing out that not everything is a conspiracy by the lizard powers that be to subjugate humanity by keeping them from seeing asteroids.
Originally posted by optimus primal
reply to post by backinblack
really, it doesn't matter if you think it's chump change or don't buy it. you know who else identifies NEO asteroids? backyard amateur astronomers, and observatories. most of the time they do it for free too. searching out asteroids is not a high priority for the nasa appropriations committee. it just isn't. i don't like it either, but the only thing we can do about it is write letters to them to that effect.
Originally posted by jasonkrice
reply to post by backinblack
I agree, it seems NASA would rather spend more money making a new one. Maybe we could all just start using Google Earth to find NEO's.