It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mblahnikluver
reply to post by woodwardjnr
Sad but it sounds like these young women thing these babies will replace the family they dont have in their life. I have seen this happen with young parents, they think a baby is a band aid and will make things better. They dont think of what it takes to raise a kid and if you have constant mental issues and no real home to go to or job then you cant take care of a child. These are the kind of people that piss me off in society.
As someone who can't have kids this bothers me because if they keep the child I dont think it will have a normal life if the parent can't take care of themself. If they can't take care of themself then they shouldn't have kids! Let someone else take the child and raise it properly. I just dont see how these women could raise a child if they has the issues you state and esp if they cant take care of themself.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Originally posted by KatieVA
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by iLoGiCViZiOnS
It takes a village to raise a child. It has, and always will be this way. No woman can take care of a child on their own and nor should they have to.
I agree with this statement wholeheartedly.
I must be an exception to the rule then, because I have raised my son on my own without any help from anyone.
And for that I commend you, but do you not think it could have been easier with the help of others? Your child is the countries future so society should want to encourage and help with your childs future development.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by Serizawa
So long as we set the minimum IQ one point higher than yours, I'm all for it.
Originally posted by mblahnikluver
reply to post by woodwardjnr
Sad but it sounds like these young women thing these babies will replace the family they dont have in their life. I have seen this happen with young parents, they think a baby is a band aid and will make things better. They dont think of what it takes to raise a kid and if you have constant mental issues and no real home to go to or job then you cant take care of a child. These are the kind of people that piss me off in society.
As someone who can't have kids this bothers me because if they keep the child I dont think it will have a normal life if the parent can't take care of themself. If they can't take care of themself then they shouldn't have kids! Let someone else take the child and raise it properly. I just dont see how these women could raise a child if they has the issues you state and esp if they cant take care of themself.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by woodwardjnr
First off, you're not a psychologist; you don't get to determine if someone is "mentally ill" or not. Second... fact is, pretty much no one is prepared to bear the work load that comes with a child. No one. Superparent is fiction, every new parent gets very surprised.
They want the babies. It's up to them. If you feel the need, yeah, offer to look into services open to them. if they say no, they say no.
I say If one does not pass income/stability/competency checks - automatic and forced abortion
Hell, this might be even more humane in the long run; think of all the pain and suffering we'd save the children of the poor and stupid.
That humane intervention along with our saved tax dollars, no WIC, no "head start" (which is like free babysitting basically)