It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RicketyCricket
reply to post by realitycheckin
In my personal opinion, the Buddha is the same as Jesus, Mohammed, Moses, Yahweh, Zeus, et al.
They all say the same thing, and the only real difference between them are names, locations and times. They all pretty much preach the "Be good to each other" philosophy. Alien or not, its a pretty good message. Respect your surroundings, respect your fellow man, respect yourself. All will be well.
Originally posted by RicketyCricket
reply to post by realitycheckin
In my personal opinion, the Buddha is the same as Jesus, Mohammed, Moses, Yahweh, Zeus, et al.
They all say the same thing, and the only real difference between them are names, locations and times. They all pretty much preach the "Be good to each other" philosophy. Alien or not, its a pretty good message. Respect your surroundings, respect your fellow man, respect yourself. All will be well.
Originally posted by Student X
reply to post by realitycheckin
One can look at religion in terms of ET, or one can look at ET in terms of religion. I think the latter makes MUCH more sense than the former. The true nature of ET is not biological and technological. Its mystical. ET did not evolve on another planet, develop technology, and fly here in space-ships. ET is the modern guise of archetypal patterns in the psyche. Earlier guises included things like fairies, gods, angels, etc. ETs are living myths; archetypes in symbolic, psychophysical forms.
The problem is too few people are familiar enough with comparative religion, comparative mythology, comparative mysticism and parapsychology to see how UFOlogy fits in with those. So they take ET far too literally.
edit on 10-2-2011 by Student X because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aliensun
Religions came from a somewhat piecemeal knowledge of trying to explain enlightenment which needs no religion. In fact, it needs no God and is all-inclusive.