BBC to broadcast live superbowl for the 1st time ever, could this be the real sum of all fears?

I think thats a bit of a stretch...
The superbowl is one of the biggest sporting events in the world and is gaining a big following in the UK, and for all we know maybe the NFL which is a buisness after all had a hand in getting the bbc to air it in order to get a wider audience?

I for one will be watching it and I know plenty of people who will be too and I'm not an American.

Or eh, some say the VX that went missing and that was later found really wasn't really found...

So... I guess a VX release/detonation at the superbowl stadium would be quite crazy...

Would sure start a war on whoever they blame it on... ``militias``, China, Iran, North Korea...


I bet nothing happens.

They know better than to kill the green bay packers you've got a few million grouchy; "beered up"; cabin fevered; bored; armed; Wisconsinites Who would take it personally, slash and burn and make Sherman's march look like a Gay pride parade...


(GO PACK!)

reply to post by woogleuk


Nope.
Dirty bomb is not nuclear. Therefore no one would refer to it as a nuke.
They can't both have the word attributed to them
If you want an alternative name for a dirty bomb. Try radioactive.
Nuclear plants, energy, weapons all have nuclear reaction in common.
Those same things only have on thing in common with dirty bombs: radioactivity.
They use nuclear waste, but it's called nuclear waste because it is the waste of nuclear reaction.
Not because it's radioactive.

reply to post by SrWingCommander


Um.. well I have explained it earlier in this thread (the same page i am replying to you from)
There is no real difference between atomic and nuclear.
One is a nuclear weapon the other is a classification for a type of weapons.
You must mean atomic (a-bomb) and thermonuclear (h-bomb).

I described the difference between dirty bomb and nuke a page or so back.
There was never a disagreement on atomic and nuclear.

it's globalist, culture breeding at it's finest.

why do you think the they did that? suppressed something for so long.

American Culture and Values doesn't mix well with Britain, IMO. It's like these two nations are starting to become more integrated.

And NO. Integration isn't happy and harmonious. You just can't tell two group how to act with each other.

if you can, get the word out it's just the USA trying to brain wash you.

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


Hey VicMorrow Just saw your name. Was the actor Vic Morrow a bad ass or what? Dooode...
COMBAT was as good a Show as an 11year old ever saw.
There was RAT PATROL watchng those morons drive endlessly around the same sanddune,,, Or COMBAT.
COMBAT had Jason whoever too.
Never mind any Helicoptor jokes.
COMBAT kicked ass.

Until Vietnam came home. Literally.... and there went the "Wondor Years." Flash Gone Not cool.
sigh

reply to post by spikey


It's not though.
I have never understood why the Brits have this view.
It's like how a lot of American's here view soccer (i always played soccer so I heard it a lot).
You will rarely see someone hit in Rugby as hard as in football. There will be more frequent hard hits, but you have 350 pound men who can run very fast and they gain speed over 60 yards and put you down.

In rugby you will never have the kind of force for 3 reasons.
1) player size
2) no pads so players will have to hold back and position as to not break themselves.
3) passing the ball while moving causes defense to shift their weight and direction so they aren't getting tons of yard of momentum.

There are just things you can't take without pads. Broken noses and fingers aren't what these guys are preventing with their pads.



BTW.. the 1:00 mark is worth several rewinds worth of laughing.[

I'm not saying rugby isn't hardass. I'd like to try it someday. I'm saying American football is designed different and you have much bigger people getting a lot of momentum not having pads against these guys would be suicide. Oh, but Chabal.. he could probably hold up against a lot of the American football players.

reply to post by lukeUK


Good grief. Its fiction!

Get a grip.

ok well...
Verdict??

reply to post by lukeUK


I'll be watching it, if it aint on super late. American Football is a fantastic sport...I dont keep up with the teams but i'll watch it for sure

Besides, didnt the BBC just launch a BBC America channel? Supposedly the Scotland V France rugby game yesterday was on in the States so i dont find it all that unusual

Rugby? Isn't that Eleanor Rigby's cousin? Common . Watch the video. Vic Morrow nailed it.
THAT"S our "FOOTY" heh

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


Let me quote you my post from a previous post:

Any bomb that uses a nuclear reaction is a nuclear bomb, just one uses fission and the other fusion (hydrogen). A dirty bomb uses a conventional chemical explosion to scatter radioactive material.

However a dirty bomb still contains nuclear material, but there is no fission or fussion.

[

Originally posted by lukeUK
If you have watched the movie sum of all fears you'll see it involves a nuclear dirty bomb exploding at a football event (superbowl) ive watched recent videos that seem to always relate to a football(american) match and a nuclear device exploding.

I just wonder why the bbc are going to be broadcasting this year, theyve never done it before as there isnt enough of a following for it over here.

Maybe they want cameras over there to broadcast the event

Thoughts please!

The Media is preparing for an event of unparalleled implications.

The world changes today. [2/6/2011]

reply to post by niceguybob


Ah I didn't see your post.
Thanks.. yep Vic was awesome.
I was just watching twilight zone actually.
Crazy way to go.

Off topic vid, but I'm posting for niceguybob as a fellow morrow fan. After this, I'll get back on topic.. even though I think we have said time and time again that this isn't the first time BBC has show the superbowl.


Interviewer is kinda boring.. but Vic is just a badass.

Originally posted by muzzleflash
Also the cameras there would not really broadcast the event if it was an actual nuke.

They would just instantly go offline. That's all we would see.

Normal life one second, feed lost next.

Cameras outside of town would be the only ones to survive the blast and record the actual event/aftermath.

Correct sir! EMP So if it happens and we see the crowd blown away we know something is wrong. It will be the "fire cant melt steel" this round. lol Ready for the net to go down?

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
If you aren't from the U.S. you can't understand.
The commercials aren't hated on.

I'm from the US, and I don't understand the attraction of watching people you don't know chasing a ball of any shape (or driving in circles fast, either). Sports are only interesting as a participant, and even then, not very.

Also, I hate every commercial ever made. Ever. I refuse to watch them, and change the channel promptly when one comes on. The fact that SB commercials are an annual topic of discussion distresses me to no end.

But, enjoy the game! At least it's a safe bet it won't be nuked.

MASSIVE UPDATE!!!!!!!!!


George Bush Jr was spotted on TV in stadium for the superbowl.
There will be NO false flag operation!!

And to think you guys were scared for a minute!!

Edit- in all honesty, to think a cash cow like the superbowl would be ruined is funny, more so than plausible!

Mr. Vic Morrow. You got game. Hope we can be friends. I'm a great host. Come to Lake Tahoe anytime.
I don't peek out of my curtains. Families are welcome here.
Peace

Would maybe watch some if there wasn't so much stopping and starting all the time. Glad that doesn't happen with football. (or as some of you would say : soccer.)