It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ExCloud
"RIP UFO over Jerusalem: Reopened you were fun"
Originally posted by laymanskeptic
Originally posted by serisony
reply to post by laymanskeptic
Here's my question, Is this the original footage for video 1? You downloaded the original video 1 footage, or got the raw file from the poster? I'm trying to understand how you came up with the mirrored image because a frame by frame analysis of the original video doesn't seem to reveal this discrepancy.
On some versions you might have downloaded (from the same youtube account eligael), you can find it I think around 1:28.
Whatever version that is, it's around the moment when the shot starts to tilt up... you'll find it.
Originally posted by Quartza
eligaels original upload is a better version to check for such effects. The shakes at the very beginning have the biggest change.
Originally posted by Quartza
Originally posted by laymanskeptic
Originally posted by serisony
reply to post by laymanskeptic
Here's my question, Is this the original footage for video 1? You downloaded the original video 1 footage, or got the raw file from the poster? I'm trying to understand how you came up with the mirrored image because a frame by frame analysis of the original video doesn't seem to reveal this discrepancy.
On some versions you might have downloaded (from the same youtube account eligael), you can find it I think around 1:28.
Whatever version that is, it's around the moment when the shot starts to tilt up... you'll find it.
eligaels original upload is a better version to check for such effects. The shakes at the very beginning have the biggest change.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by believerofgod
I explained to you what real shake should NOT look like. It should not be 100% consistent in both time and magnitude. Human bodies are not robots. Real shake would be random and inconsistent in time and magnitude, especially when you are trying to steady a camera to get a good shot. The only way to replicate the shake that is best visible in video 4 is to be a robot with electrically controlled servos.
If you watch this video at 1:46, you will see the light inside the circle NEVER leaves the circle for quite a long period of time... Real shake would never be that consistent, and the light would have left the circle if a real human was filming.
If you understand how default fake camera shake works, you would understand why it stays in the circle.. When you set up fake camera shake you set both a time per second and a magnitude. The magnitude is important, it is the maximum amount of pixels the shake will move. In other words, it sets how big the circle is for the light to jump around in.
There is no way a human can replicate the camera shake found in video 4.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
Originally posted by Quartza
eligaels original upload is a better version to check for such effects. The shakes at the very beginning have the biggest change.
It doesn't matter.
Its a hoax.
People really shouldn't advertise proven hoaxed wares for hoaxers.
Unless you personally have reason to do so?
Eh? Eh eh?
See you next time...when "someone" tries this crap again.
Must be getting hard for you? No?
MMedit on 5-2-2011 by Mr Mask because: (no reason given)
Hi Quartza. Yes I used Eligael's original upload to find the anomalies. I'm sure you can find those same anomalies :-) give it a try? for your education :-) wouldn't hurt to try for yourself would it? :-)
Originally posted by Pinke
Originally posted by ExCloud
"RIP UFO over Jerusalem: Reopened you were fun"
Laymanskeptic, I apologize if when you first asked me questions I was a little short with you; just normally persons here ask me questions to poke holes in my character as opposed to genuine questions. Which yours was!
Originally posted by Quartza
reply to post by laymanskeptic
Hi Quartza. Yes I used Eligael's original upload to find the anomalies. I'm sure you can find those same anomalies :-) give it a try? for your education :-) wouldn't hurt to try for yourself would it? :-)
Thank you for assuming I did not. It states in my post that I did search and found other examples.
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
reply to post by laymanskeptic
MORE ! I WANT MORE!
I think there are more telling signs we may yet still be overlooking.
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
Hoaxers lose again