Does the 13th amendment make forced Child support illegal?

reply to post by korathin

Whatever. Because really no matter what is said you will try and turn untruths to truths and truths to untruths, so everything confirms to your narrowly biased worldview. You make as much rational sense as that feminist troll.

What exactly is so biased that you seem to be so emotional about, did you not say you do not even have kids. So why with all the hoopla about this subject. Like I said no piece of paper or any law or court is going to fix this if the people involved don't get there # together. Is that not what all those systems are for anyways? if # does not work, then a third entity will make it work somehow magically. And why do you compare me to the feminist lady, I really don't agree on much with them, and there as weird as you are.

Hate to break it to you but the wage gap is mostly caused by women not working as hard or taking time off(In Gen X), picking less profitable careers. In Gen Y there is a very real wage gap of Gen Y women earning almost 1.25$ more then Gen Y men because of gross gender discrimination in the educational system.

So what then? You want to start a some sort of maninst group, so as things become more fair in that department? Have you thought that it might have nothing much to do with all that, just that there are more middle men type jobs out there now a days, that would cater more to the less then physical domains, and that this whole civilization is changing.

Dude your still not getting it. All your "bash the male" style of justice will get you is the really scummy scum involved in a kind of hyper-gammy while smarter males stay away. Leading to de-evolution, propagation of mass poverty and a huge socio-economic mess. In short your guaranteeing a future that looks more like Idiocracy then Star Trek.

I am not bashing males, why would you think that. Though you could be right on the whole leading to de-evolution and a Idiocracy type of society, but then again one mistake you make is that. You assume we aren't in one already, but it can always get worse thats for sure. And I don't think this issue is as big as all that, that it would be capable of destroying civilization as you say. It's just mostly about bad relationships and kids, that it comes down to.

And really Star Trek is that your vision for a better future. "No offence to Star Trek nerds, you all are a touchy bunch" But you got to realize that Star Trek is as silly as Idiocracy in many ways, but whatever floats peoples boats I guess. And for some reason people want to go live in space, in a can, when they cant even live on a planet that offers all they would need, some how they think they will be capable of living in space, in a small cramped space ship, without killing each other, when they cant even do that on earth. But anyways.

It's like your eyes are closed, your ears refuse to listen and your mouth only speaks lies. Can't change the system because of the recession? I hate to break it to you but 80% of the job's lost where male job's. Female controlled sectors of the economy are still solid and expanding at an alarming rate(within another 20 years most lawyers, Doctors and other skilled professions will become female dominated professions). It is like your stuck in the 50's-60's.

Lol is that what your worrying about? Try the total wipe out of this paradigm in more then a couple of generations, and no, I do not believe there will be any favorites. And your worried about more females becoming doctors and lawyers, wtf. And as you can see its starting to begin to start, in that process, usually such things do not go smooth, but we will see.

Originally posted by Vicky32

Originally posted by korathin
. So the feminist controlled government

Wow, there's paranoid fantasy for you! Sorry, I couldn't help but laugh when I saw this...
No government in the world is feminist controlled.
Vicky

Actually the feminist agenda is a government agenda, he is mistaken its not run by feminists. It's just something that some in government use to get there way, because it pulls on peoples strings. They just manipulate those strings for there personal gains.

Originally posted by galadofwarthethird

Originally posted by Vicky32

Originally posted by korathin
. So the feminist controlled government

Wow, there's paranoid fantasy for you! Sorry, I couldn't help but laugh when I saw this...
No government in the world is feminist controlled.
Vicky

Actually the feminist agenda is a government agenda, he is mistaken its not run by feminists. It's just something that some in government use to get there way, because it pulls on peoples strings. They just manipulate those strings for there personal gains.

Because I am not in the USA, I don't really know, but I seriously doubt that your government has any kind of feminist agenda! Mind you, from reading the thread, I have seen that some people have a very strange idea of what feminism is!
Vicky

Originally posted by Vicky32
Because I am not in the USA, I don't really know, but I seriously doubt that your government has any kind of feminist agenda!

Why do you doubt it so much? Politicians pander to interest groups and feminists are a well-established interest group, they have influenced many government policies.

Originally posted by SevenBeans

Originally posted by Vicky32
Because I am not in the USA, I don't really know, but I seriously doubt that your government has any kind of feminist agenda!

Why do you doubt it so much? Politicians pander to interest groups and feminists are a well-established interest group, they have influenced many government policies.

edit on 17-2-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)

Aye, look how high Obama jumped after the NOW demanded over half the stimulus be spent on women..

Chicks think they are slick and cohabitate with a partner instead – I made a little bit of side business in Fayetteville doing a few surveillance jobs for cases just like that.

In my case, it is HE who thinks he is slick. He left me for his now fiance who works as a social worker of sorts and makes enough to provide for both of them. He has chosen to work under-the-table for the past 18 months. She supports him, and when he does actually find a job, he thinks he can be smart and work for minimum wages or quit the very first time he sees a payment removed from his paycheck. He asked me to be a stay at home mom and care for our kids while we were married. As the economy declined, and I lost 2 years of job experience, I have become unemployable and have been in and out of homeless shelters. I think that child support should be criminally prosecutable. If I can not provide for our children and they are harmed, I go to prison for neglect of a dependent. If he also fails to provide he should be charged the same. I had a conversation with a friend last night who has custody of his son and he feels as though it is in fact, unconstitutional. I feel that if I can be imprisoned for failure to provide, so should their father. By the way, this same "man" signed off his rights to his older daughter, allowing the maternal grandparents to adopt her... all to get out of child support.