[RINGS] Wowzers-coincidence?

Thread 8754 is where the circle is.

8+7+5+4=24

24/2 (2rings)=12 (the number we needed)

The bytes of the o photo are 2163

2+1+6+3=12 (again, the number we needed)

12/24=2



8754+2163=10917

8754-2163=6591

10917+6591=17508

17508/12=1459

1459/12=2 (2 rings)



10917-6591=4326

4326/12=360.5

360 is a circle.



Very odd.



[edit on 11-7-2004 by AnonymousPoster4]

I would like to commend you, AP4, on your use of the word 'wowzers'. Not only for the bravery involved, but also the challenging spelling dilemma, and the great comedy value. Thank you.

Anyway, I think the above maths is just coincidence and/or another way of getting to the 8754 clue. Oh, and:

8754+2163=10917
8754-2163=6591
....
10917-6591=4326

4326 is, by default, 2 x 2163, due to the way you worked it out.

you guys pay no attention 12 was the number that got us to the number we needed remember this
you found the number you need
o

o is not a number but it is the 13th number in the alphabet.

Originally posted by machinegunjordan
you guys pay no attention 12 was the number that got us to the number we needed remember this
you found the number you need
o

o is not a number but it is the 13th number in the alphabet.

I know this, hence me saying (a couple times) 12, the number WE NEEDED!

12 was not the number we needed o is but that is not a number but the 15th number in the alphabet.

[edit on 7/11/2004 by machinegunjordan]

i know im bad at maths, but -
o is not a number - it is a letter & it is the 15th letter of the alphabet

Originally posted by justyc
i know im bad at maths, but -
o is not a number - it is a letter & it is the 15th letter of the alphabet

yea yer right it is the 15th i was just testing you thats all good job.

We needed 12 to figure out the answer. Get it now? I swear you just try to stir stuff up.