It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by squandered
reply to post by RRokkyy
If Yellowstone blows you'll be the immigrants.
Originally posted by tom502
The Elites hates whites, because they stand in their way for total world control. They feel the darker people are dumber and easier to control, so they have all these anti-white agendas.
Whites are easy to control so they are favoured. The only issue is why are they being multiculturalised and punished? It's easy stuff that works on them.They are a threat like Elites are a threat because being enslaved teaches you lessons which you can't even avoid. The slave always became the master. Our current Elites would make the greatest slaves, no.
I would say that the current, most popular racist perspective, is that blacks are physically superior and mentally inferior, whites occupy the middle ground of physical and mental capability, and Asians are considers physically inferior and mentally superior.
I don't buy into this, but that is a different topic.
The thing is, Asians, who are supposed to be the most intelligent, in my opinion, make the best slaves.
Originally posted by JR MacBeth
reply to post by poet1b
Poet, you mention that Asians might make the better "slaves", in spite of their higher average IQs, and you go on to cite some of their history.
JR
Originally posted by poet1b
Liberal elites are not liberals at all, they are only interested in helping those they deem as downtrodden by the masses, but they are all too eager to step all over the rights of the working class to do what they believe is leveling the playing field. After you talk with these people for a while, you will see find that most have a real hatred for the working class, especially the white working class.
If IQ's are culturally biased. The test must favor those who read the appropriate cultural messages. Is there another way to define a good slave then base it on the best IQ scores?
Originally posted by JR MacBeth
I have to wonder what our masters imagine the "ideal slave" to be like. Whatever that is, we might logically conclude that TPTB would want to herd humanity in that direction, using carrot and stick, and the many means at their disposal, to practice a form of "animal" husbandry, on the whole human population. If their goal is to achieve an ideal slave population one day, then the enigmatic things we see today could be explainable, in that context.
JR
Originally posted by JR MacBeth
For example, while Asian and Jewish IQ scores seemed to consistently be the highest, on average, both groups seemed to produce relatively few "geniuses", at least in comparison to white populations. This may be counter to popular thinking, when we have postage stamps commemorating Einstein, clearly a genius, and a resulting (unfounded) consensus that genius is more common in Jews. The data didn't indicate that, perhaps to the dismay of many Jewish psychologists, who possibly expected to see more than they found.
JR
~The proportion of Jews with IQ’s of 140 or more is estimated to be about six times the proportion of any other ethnic group. ~ Although Jews constitute only about two-tenths of one percent of the world’s population, Jews won 29 percent of the Nobel Prizes in literature, medicine, physics and chemistry in the second half of the 20th century. So far this century, the figure is 32 percent.