It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For one, manipulating the data would take exceptional care and human input beyond comprehension. Aside from altitude, you would have to match the accelerometer data, yoke inputs, pitch angle, etc. Something that strikes me as odd, is that you agree that there is government involvment, however you have not taken all of the information into consideration. If the aircraft struck the Pentagon, the last stored data would show a lower altitude, with a distance ending much closer to the impact point. A flight data recorder MUST store information every 500 milliseconds (typical period), with data retention beyond anything a plane crash could produce. Look at the function of EEPROM and what must happen in order to erase data (IE: enable bit lines, voltage bias, duration of stable power, etc.) Look at the integrity specifications of the shell (rated at thousands of g's). There is no reasonable explanation for flight information to be void from the recorder unless it was stripped away. If you agree that the data is manipulated, you shuold look into the function of the system and how all the sensors relate. YOu cannot simply change one parameter without exposing others. It would be foolish to assume a human typed in millions of data points just to alter the height of the aircraft. it would be foolish to suggest data was wiped out during impact. This is not how an electrical, solid state storage device operates/behaves. If you want to learn more about this, we can discuss as adults under scientific terms. There are several errors in your analogy and unfortunately, they do not support your theory. if you believe the aircraft hit the Pentagon, please do not use the excuses of data alteration, and/or missing data from impact to make your case. Once again, there are several factors you are not considering, nor understand about the system and I would be happy to explain them and unite this push for the truth.
Originally posted by turbofan
I will never forgive Balsamo for what he did
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by Alfie1
Not really Alfie. This thread is more about Legge and why/how he should have final word on FDR data over
more qualified, experienced people.
Neither Legge, or Stutt have anything to do with aviation, crash investigation, or FDR data recovery/technology.
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by Alfie1
Why do you care, Alfie?
Originally posted by Alfie1
Because I think this Legge/Stutt paper is very important
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by Alfie1
Because I think this Legge/Stutt paper is very important
Because it helps prove a plane hit the Pentagon?
Originally posted by Alfie1
How about discussing it on the earlier thread ?
who is this geeza and whats he done thats unforgivable if you dont mind me asking?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by turbofan
I will never forgive Balsamo for what he did
Balsamo does and has done many things that are unforgivable. The only thing one can do is educate others in the flaws of his research, and the research of others he's connected to, i.e. CIT and John Lear, for example.
Originally posted by kaya82
who is this geeza
Originally posted by kaya82
and whats he done thats unforgivable
Tracking Capability: Up to 100.5 meters per sec., or 330 feet per sec.
Boeing 747, 757, 767, 777, 737x