It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by samkent
Do you really think dozens of company heads would jointly assume they could keep the whole thing secret.
Your connection is just in your mind.
Correct me if I am wrong but don’t the people of the government have to eventually walk through the same TSA lines as you and I? Isn’t their phones subject to the same wiretaps? Wouldn’t they be subjecting themselves to the same liberty restrictions?
One idiot in Okalahoma City killed 168 and injured 680 more.
168 x 19 = 3192 Hmmm Interesting relation there.
You just don’t want to believe such a simple plan worked as well as it did.
....You can prove up down left and right that thermite destroyed the towers supports...
His son is an Israeli lawyer who emigrated to Israel in 2001 and whose law firm works for and with the Rothschild-funded Mossad company responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks.
On January 12, 2006, Hellerstein dismissed the last remaining property-damage claim against New York City, while leaving pending several other suits against other parties, among them the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
Alvin Hellerstein, on July 7, 2008 ruled that "the city is not required to re-sift through debris from ground zero in search of bits of human remains and remove it to a space where a cemetery might be built
On December 20, 2004, Hellerstein said he would deny a government request to delay a review of whether certain Central Intelligence Agency internal files related to Iraq
On June 3, 2005, Judge Hellerstein ordered the government to release four videos from Abu Ghraib prison and dozens of photographs from the same collection
On September 29, 2005, in ACLU v. Department of Defense , Hellerstein ordered the release of 87 more photographs and videotapes.
Originally posted by samkent
I doubt you would be able to find a jury that would agree with you on this. Building safety inspectors don’t go looking for aircraft defense features during any part of the design/construction process.
Since it was designed to withstand a 707 impact, lawyers would quickly point out the planes were larger than design spec.
Imagine trying to sue an auto manufacturer over an auto crash with an 18 wheeler. Just because the car had a 5 star rating doesn’t mean it could win.