John Lear says "Aliens Are Eating Us !"

reply to post by Beast Of Gevaudan


Don't forget all those losers who cannot refrain from insulting people.

There are alot of people who use ufology to find targets, make fun of them and troll them hard. Those people have done alot more damage; their ridicule keeps cases from being presented.

Everyone knows nuts are involved in ufology, but not many people (newcomers) are aware of the disgusting vitriol put forth by people hanging around the field and they are put off by it when they see it.

Originally posted by Mr. D
Like I said, maybe there are some that do eat us and some that don't, we can't just throw them in one hypothetical box and they are all bad.

True I just found this Pleadian Star Priestess


robertjrgraham.com...

Now that is some sumptuous morsel....

Originally posted by easynow
and plenty more crazy crap

And you believe dust on scanners is UFO's on the moon...

each to his own I guess..

Originally posted by zorgon
And you believe dust on scanners is UFO's on the moon...

each to his own I guess..

i posted pictures for discussion and never made any definitive claims

nice try at the spin zone


do me a favor there Zorgy

see this webpage on your site

www.thelivingmoon.com...

please delete the reference on there to my youtube channel

i don't want to be associated with you or a CIA disinfo agent like John Lear

thank you

reply to post by easynow


What pictures are you two talking about?

I demand to know.


*** "demands"

reply to post by Exuberant1



pictures i posted for discussion have nothing to do with John Lear the CIA dis-info agent

and need i remind you that you posted plenty of them too !

Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by Exuberant1

 

and need i remind you that you posted plenty of them too !

I still want to know.

Is it the Apollo 11 'ufo' image where you caught NASA manipulating the image for 'aesthetic porpoises"?

*P.S. my anomalies are way better than those of John Lear CIA disinfotroll extraordinaire. You don't have to use your imagination to see my super-badass anoms:

...super-badass, bro.


Edit:

The aliens probably have a people-processing factory on the moon. It makes sense.

(I bet the make the buns somewhere else though.)

Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by Beast Of Gevaudan

 

Don't forget all those losers who cannot refrain from insulting people.

There are alot of people who use ufology to find targets, make fun of them and troll them hard. Those people have done alot more damage; their ridicule keeps cases from being presented.

Everyone knows nuts are involved in ufology, but not many people (newcomers) are aware of the disgusting vitriol put forth by people hanging around the field and they are put off by it when they see it.

edit on 20-12-2010 by Exuberant1 because: (no reason given)

who do you think does "more damage"



someone who exposes a CIA dis-info agent for what he is ?

or

someone who spreads dis-info to the younger generation with claims like,

"no Apollo spacecraft ever orbited or landed on the Moon" ?

"there are no rovers on Mars"

"the Billy Meier story is true"



i'd like to hear your opinion on that Exuberant1

reply to post by easynow


Check out this logic:

The USA went to the moon, they could have faked it.

Don't tell me the country who landed men on the moon couldn't have faked it? We put a man on the moon, damnit.

/logic off

*Anyhow, I don't think John Lear is as effective as some people like to think he is. Also, people who blindly believe john lear are probably not going to contribute anything to ufology.

If it wasn't for the likes of John lear, it would be more difficult to determine who the dummies were; you see we can spot them more easily when they are trumpeting Lear's BS. But if they didn't have some BS to trumpet they might be able to pass as normal for a longer period of time.

That would ruin EVERYTHING we hold dear, easy. There'd be Newbs everywhere passing as old hands. Newbs everywhere....

Originally posted by captiva
John Lear, I could take or leave and found his ideas nothing more than a distraction. What I do find interesting and to a degree its still on topic is this.

I have a friend who is for ever telling me the meaning of life, why we are over weight and the real reasons for the 2012 idea.

Respects

So this means they are going to eat all the fat folks first?

Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by Beast Of Gevaudan

 

Don't forget all those losers who cannot refrain from insulting people.

There are alot of people who use ufology to find targets, make fun of them and troll them hard. Those people have done alot more damage; their ridicule keeps cases from being presented.

Everyone knows nuts are involved in ufology, but not many people (newcomers) are aware of the disgusting vitriol put forth by people hanging around the field and they are put off by it when they see it.

edit on 20-12-2010 by Exuberant1 because: (no reason given)

True, the ridicule doesn't help. Still, guys like Hoagland, Greer and Lear, with the nonsense they spew, receive too much air time in my opinion. They just give the people who ridicule the UFO topic more ammunition.

Actually....my extraterrestrioal contacts have given me the real poop.

We are dealing mostly with individuals who have arrived from the star Vega, and its system of planets. It is an important star from our standpoint, significant as the (former) Earth Pole Star....and, will be again in about 11,700 years. It is relatively nearby (only about 25 LY) and thus a popular congregating point for many travelers on their way to Sol System, and Earth.

Of course, coming from that location, they call themselves Vegans....and thus are dedicated to consuming no animal products.

Let's face it....Humans are animals......


I was fortunate enough to have this image passed to me from an un-named source --- only info I have is it's possibly one of the Vegan's orbital transfer shuttle designs.....appears the photo was snapped as it prepared to depart, as the main cargo hatch is still open...can only assume they have just finished loading the rutabagas and zucchini for transport back to the orbiting mother-ship......:


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c80971d07852.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by easynow


What are doing easynow? I read alot of your material and you don't normally post threads like this what has changed? is it supposed to be tongue and cheek or serious? I am confused

Looking at it logically it would appear that we are indeed animals. We may be at the top of the food chain here on earth but that does not mean that we are off planet. It would stand to reason that there are beings more advanced and indeed higher up the food chain than us.

IMHO - I personally believe that there are beings that exist that we do not know about that harvest hu-mans for their dna, which is the reason why blood is so commonly used in certain masonic rituals.

Edit: Ok Theres definitely something going on here, I have just checked oout the contributors to this thread and I get the feeling that something isn't quite right, is this a bash John Lear thread or something? I am watching all of you!

reply to post by Exuberant1



Oh, brother!!!!

You referred to Lear as a "disinfotroll", as you post that? Really?

Care to point out which one of THESE was used, to make that....that....whatever you call it, up above??

Originally posted by weedwhacker

Care to point out which one of THESE was used, to make that....that....whatever you call it, up above??

I already did.

*This proves that you don't even read the posts you reply to.


Edit:

Since you are a pilot and all, what do you think of my Moon Heinkel?

It is a Heinkel right bro?

reply to post by PerfectPerception


Good post............one man's "god" is another man's "visiting astronaut".

The thought that we are not at the top of the universal food chain is so scary some people refuse to even consider the idea.

reply to post by Exuberant1

*This proves that you don't even read the posts you reply to.

I looked, very hard, at the post where you included that "badass" image, with the "antenna"....

Looked three times....only way I knew the satellite that provided the Lunar image was from what was printed on it..."lo5". (That bright lime green is really, really hard to make out...I see other numbers, too...looks lke "426"?? Can't make out the rest. Couldn't find any LO5 image with number "426" associated).

I looked at your "url" used, and didn't see a number that matched an LO5 image from the website archive of images, either....

reply to post by Exuberant1

It is a Heinkel right....?

Welll....if "pareidolia" means "Heinkel" to you...whatever spins your propeller......

reply to post by weedwhacker


What are you trying to say?

That you cannot find the portion of lunar terrain exhibited in the lunar orbiter image lo5 126 h2a?

Edit: It appears you edited your post....

Originally posted by franspeakfree
reply to post by easynow

 

What are doing easynow? I read alot of your material and you don't normally post threads like this what has changed? is it supposed to be tongue and cheek or serious? I am confused

Looking at it logically it would appear that we are indeed animals. We may be at the top of the food chain here on earth but that does not mean that we are off planet. It would stand to reason that there are beings more advanced and indeed higher up the food chain than us.

IMHO - I personally believe that there are beings that exist that we do not know about that harvest hu-mans for their dna, which is the reason why blood is so commonly used in certain masonic rituals.

Edit: Ok Theres definitely something going on here, I have just checked oout the contributors to this thread and I get the feeling that something isn't quite right, is this a bash John Lear thread or something? I am watching all of you!

Hi franspeakfree, it seems to me that we have on many issues the same views and thoughts, and that is also about what I see happening in this thread.
I really cannot believe that that was the original purpose behind easynow’s thread, but regarding your last remark above, I to have the same impression, and that is that it did become a thread in which some members are using it to bashing John Lear as much as possible, and in which too badly some by me very respected members are attacking each other in a way I would have not expected.

Very sad indeed.

reply to post by Exuberant1


Ooooohhhh....that's a 126??? Looks like a "4".....

So, it's this one??:

ser.sese.asu.edu...