It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By repaying its TARP loan, for example, Goldman wriggled out from under the nettlesome compensation limits imposed by TARP, while also conveying an image of financial strength. But this “strength” was illusory. Goldman repaid the TARP loans with funds it procured days earlier from the Federal Reserve. Then, over the ensuing months, Goldman recapitalized its balance sheet by selling tens of billions of dollars of mortgage-backed securities to the Fed.
And the public never knew anything about these activities until two weeks ago, when the Fed was forced to reveal them....
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Not a wall street guy, can you give me s simple version of what this article means?
Originally posted by babybunnies
The Bush administration also promised that TARP was a "one time thing" and that as SOON as the banks repaid the money they borrowed the money was to go IMMEDIATELY back to the Treasury, it wasn't authorized for any other programs at all.
Not a single dime has seen its way back to Treasury.
Originally posted by sara123123
Originally posted by babybunnies
The Bush administration also promised that TARP was a "one time thing" and that as SOON as the banks repaid the money they borrowed the money was to go IMMEDIATELY back to the Treasury, it wasn't authorized for any other programs at all.
Not a single dime has seen its way back to Treasury.
I honestly believe that Bush, Obama and the other politicans had no clue this was going to happen when they passed TARP. It was intended to be kept secret and that is why the Fed did it. Generally, this is the problem in DC. Our representatives are pikers when it comes to dealing with the international banksters. The Fed is our unregulated economic overlord.
Originally posted by Oaktree
reply to post by Billmeister
Well, I agree 100% with you on voting independent. I have for the most part, voted for every qualified independent that came my way. I have even voted for some independents in which I didn't necessarily agree with many of their positions, simply because they were independent, and I knew what I would be getting with a vote for the ReDemacrans.
I, unfortunately, believe that some action beyond my vote needs to occur.
I am still unsure as to that best action.