posted on Dec, 12 2010 @ 12:49 PM
Thanks for the link.
It is hard to rationalize any conspiracy. On the surface it seems to make sense, but stepping back it is illogical, or rather unbelievable.
A depopulation of the entire gulf coast is impossible. If they bought out everyone within a 20 mile demarcation of the waters of the gulf it would
cost more than 40 billion dollars. Assuming they could get rid of "everyone" for the corporations, there still has to be workers to run the
refineries, the docks, the restaurants, the utilities, etc.
Now I do not think that there was not some shady crap going on. And without a doubt these people manage to make money on the disasters. On these
points, the wall street money, the Boots and Coots acquisition, the CEO of BP dumping a third of his stocks, there it would seem is the conspiracy.
BP knew the well was in trouble and gambled it could control the situation, or so the varied reports state. To hedge the bet selling off stocks that
could go south, if you knew, would be a smart move. Acquiring a oil well fire fighting company would be smart especially if you saw the potential
disaster starting.
The sensationalism of a depopulation theory can pull one into the web of delusion. I get the fever myself, but the conspiracy has to be based on
reality. Answer the questions of who, what, why, how and when. For me here the how is the issue. You cannot depopulate an area completely and not have
to repopulate it with people to do the work, unless we have robots that are humanoid and use AI. Any re population would lead to the same result as
what you have now. Not everyone would be blind, some would start to think and the process would start over.
It makes a good story, but depopulation goes against the corrupts best interest. Dead people do not pay taxes, and the gulf industry from fishery to
vacations has the potential to bring in money beyond what oil alone would.
Thanks for the link.