It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
Oh yeah I noticed that typo, for the first one I meat to say “this is not a good idea and here is why”. If the only thing you could pick up after me showing they could all have other explanations then I think that shows I have a point.
But thanks for pointing that out, I hate this 4 hour rule.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
If you bothered to read my post you would have picked up quite quickly on the typo and that I give multiple explanations that did not all include “that’s out of context” however you are right they are all out of context. This makes me think you didn’t even bother reading past the first line of my post, so how can you comment.
That quote is out of context he could very well have been saying I don’t think a one world government is a good idea and here is why.....
David Rockefeller,- he is a long term advocate of a one world government just because he says this is his desire it does not make it a reality
David Spangler-- As soon as people start to bring Satan into these debates they have lost the debate.
This could be a quote influenced by the renowned international relations theorist Alexander Windet
this could be a reference to the soviet threat that’s been taken out of context.
"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas." - Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.
"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent." Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950 www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by SimonPeter
Well the book I am talking about is called “the builderberg Conspiracy” so I wouldn’t call it selective reading, there are some interesting points that are raised in this book that do cause me to cast a question over the acts of individual members of the group. However I have not seen any evidence from reading this and other texts that Builderberg members are secretly working on cooperation to create a one world government. Also the attendees of the meetings are given more than “a few days’ notice” which is usually how the location of the event leeks, either that or a member of the hotel staff leek the location
And again I have not seen anything that suggests it’s a group of Jews who control the world. If you were going to pick out one “religious” group that is controlling the world or attempting to achieve a one world government the it would either be the Christians or the Atheists (due to increasing secularisation of society)