It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What is This Object in Apollo 11 Footage?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 10:39 PM
link   
First, the usual opening remark for all new threads: Mods, if this topic has been covered please remove thread.

I just went to ufocasebook.com to look for something when I saw this and I thought that it might generate some interest and, hopefully, a lively thread as various POVs are expressed. Just remember that your expressing only an opinion as there are probably no experts on stuff like this.

www.ufocasebook.com...



posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 10:44 PM
link   
It's a balloon obviously...

Actually it's really weird, doesn't particularly look like artifact. I'm sure the NASA shill will be along shortly to tell us it's space poop....



posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 10:55 PM
link   
They've got all bases covered don't they?


If they are on the moon then it has to be an alien artifact or is it proof they are not on the moon???


Basically they don't really care what it is, as long as it "proves" NASA wrong in some way.

Love it.




posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 10:55 PM
link   
reply to post by The Shrike
 


You notice the small rocks cast their shadows to the right, But this object appears to be almost floating with a tail and cast's no shadow?



posted on Dec, 1 2010 @ 11:33 PM
link   
just from looking at it - i vote dust on the scanner head or film stock



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
just from looking at it - i vote dust on the scanner head or film stock


Why does that not surprise me? You really DID pick a good name
Did you even bother to look if its REALLY there in the original photo? No? didn't think so

:shk:

www.hq.nasa.gov...



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Shrike
I thought that it might generate some interest and, hopefully, a lively thread as various POVs are expressed.


Well ya got a good one... I'll give ya the coveted flag/star and you might make mention on Pegasus


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/337fa101a941.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/230ec7ef39c8.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/30e96bb8cf33.png[/atsimg]



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Shrike
Just remember that your expressing only an opinion as there are probably no experts on stuff like this.


Remember to tell Jim Oberg that, about there are no experts, when he tells us its debris



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:29 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


What's a Chinese lantern doing on the Moon ??

Did they beat us there ?



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by The Shrike
I thought that it might generate some interest and, hopefully, a lively thread as various POVs are expressed.


Well ya got a good one... I'll give ya the coveted flag/star and you might make mention on Pegasus


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/337fa101a941.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/230ec7ef39c8.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/30e96bb8cf33.png[/atsimg]




What do you think it is Zorgon.
It's nothing I've ever flown.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 01:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1
What do you think it is Zorgon.
It's nothing I've ever flown.


No thought yet... still going through all the Apollo equipment they could have left up there. So far I don't see a match yet. Also still need to get an approximate size of that thing
edit on 2-12-2010 by zorgon because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 01:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by The Shrike
Just remember that your expressing only an opinion as there are probably no experts on stuff like this.


Remember to tell Jim Oberg that, about there are no experts, when he tells us its debris


I think I started telling Oberg that as far as I was concerned when talking about NASA videos content that his expertise was as good as mine!



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 01:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Violater1
What do you think it is Zorgon.
It's nothing I've ever flown.


No thought yet... still going through all the Apollo equipment they could have left up there. So far I don't see a match yet. Also still need to get an approximate size of that thing
edit on 2-12-2010 by zorgon because: (no reason given)


What equipment? It had JUST landed..

The Eagle has just landed, this is one of the first images recorded and yet on the lunar surface is a clearly artifical object that appears to be observing the Lunar Lander.


If that's true of course..



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 01:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Violater1
What do you think it is Zorgon.
It's nothing I've ever flown.


No thought yet... still going through all the Apollo equipment they could have left up there. So far I don't see a match yet. Also still need to get an approximate size of that thing
edit on 2-12-2010 by zorgon because: (no reason given)


I haven't had the time either to look around but I noticed that the photo numbers are not sequential since one number above or below the photo number (as11-40-5854hr) shows Earth from the moon or space instead of other surface photos. Not until 52 (and below) do you get another lunar surface photo.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 01:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Shrike
I think I started telling Oberg that as far as I was concerned when talking about NASA videos content that his expertise was as good as mine!


Okay so... what is your opinion on what it is? The fact that there is no shadow also applies to the rocks near it. Also the shadow on the left near the top do not match the angle of those in the fore ground

I will clip them in a bit



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 05:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Shrike
I haven't had the time either to look around but I noticed that the photo numbers are not sequential since one number above or below the photo number (as11-40-5854hr) shows Earth from the moon or space instead of other surface photos. Not until 52 (and below) do you get another lunar surface photo.


That is odd will have to check that

AS = Apollo Spacecraft
11 = Mission Number
40 = Roll number

... so there is no way the image on both sides of that image on that role can be in orbit

But sleep now sleep is good



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 05:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
just from looking at it - i vote dust on the scanner head or film stock


Why does that not surprise me? You really DID pick a good name
Did you even bother to look if its REALLY there in the original photo? No? didn't think so

:shk:

www.hq.nasa.gov...


FFS -are you REALLY so ill educated or just playing to the audience ?

www.hq.nasa.gov...

is NOT the " origional photo " do you understand that ??????????

its a SCAN of a peice of kodak filmstock

the only way to review if this anomolie is actually present in the " origional photo " is to examine the negative

even a 1st generation print can ` aquire ` contamination during the enlarging and developing

so take your head out your arse and try again .



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 05:20 AM
link   
reply to post by ignorant_ape
 



the only way to review if this anomolie is actually present in the " origional photo " is to examine the negative


So do you have the negative or did that dissapear with the rest of the Apolloo 11 files??
If you don't have it or access to it then what do you suggest?
Should we just call this pic an artifact on the film and move along?

What do you think it is??

So many question and so few answers.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 05:50 AM
link   
Here is the same photo from
eol.jsc.nasa.gov...

You can request a slightly higher resolution than than the sources above.

It's still pretty pathetic though, in 2010 all the photos from all the apollo missions should be available in extremely high res .tiff files.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/bd15a57643f2.jpg[/atsimg]

I've adjusted the brightness / contrast / sharpness ... good find, can't say what it is though.
Does appear to have some sort of shadow though.





edit on 2-12-2010 by ppk55 because: changed 2011 to 2010, probably will still apply though



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 07:13 AM
link   
Man, I hate to say this ,Because
I love a conspiracy as much as the next guy.
and no disrespect to the op. but, that looks
like somebodies trying to pull a fast one.
Damn if it dont look like your stereo- typical
alien head. like he's been buried in the sand.

Peace.

i hope i,m wrong .
edit on 2-12-2010 by BrainGarden because: add on



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join