Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

First off I would like to apologize
to all my friends here at ATS for helping
push this wiki agenda. I was fooled by
it from the beginning just like a lot
of you were. And I unknowingly pushed
the wiki agenda through my posts. It
was no my intention to fall into this
NWO Agenda. I ask for your forgiveness.

Recently my investigation has brought
to light some evidence that clarifies
to me beyond a reasonable doubt that
Wikileaks nor Julian Assange are what
they appear to be. So without further ado
let's get to the meat and potatos

Wikileaks is a Psy-Op for the NWO Agenda

In today's times where terrorism runs rampant
across many countries. There is no flag
associated with terrorism. There is no
one country associated with terrorism.
However there is one thing associated
with terrorism on every level. That is
MONEY.

If I follow the money associated
with Wikileaks, I find a very prominent
name associated with it.

George Soros

Julian Assange is paid by George Soros
geraldcelentechannel.blogspot.com...

and here

www.thenewamerican.com...

So how does the wikileak scheme work?

Soros sets up a website called wikileaks
to obtain information on ALL governments,
not just the US.

Unsuspecting whistleblowers go to the
site and graciously give up their
data to an unknown entity.

That info is then used as blackmail
against enemies of Soros, such as
competing partners, Banks not aligned
with the Soros line, Corporations,
Politicians, Governments of every make
and model. The agenda is NOT money.
It is power and control. If you have
the power to control everyone, then
you can rule the world. Soros doesn't want
your money, he wants your soul.

So Soros can't get the PR campaign going
to get his blackmail evidence without a
public face that everybody trusts. In comes
a wandering genuis by the name of Julian Assange
who has a baby face that everybody will
love and trust. Julian becomes the public role
model of wikileaks to gain the public trust.
More blackmail data is shared and Soros
increases his ability to mainipulate
world governments by blackmailing them
into submission.

One more piece of the puzzle is disclosed.
Guess who is representing Bradley Manning
in his Court martial?

Manning’s attorney is Mark Stevens, who also
does pro-bono work for George Soros and the
Open Society Institute.

Additionally, Assange negotiated with George Soros’
Open Society Institute for funding for Wikileaks.

www.thenewamerican.com...

How do you hide and sustain this Psy-Op?

You buy off or blackmail existing clandestine operatives
from existing agencies like Mossad and CIA. If
anyone comes asking or reporting evidence
of this scheme, they place that info directly
into the hands of the enemy. The evidence
is disposed of. The best intel ops u can buy
are the ones already working in the agency.

So why are the leaks release incrementally?

All the blackmail data Soros has is not of use
to him. But if he wants an agenda accomplished
then he can dig through the data to find out
which leaks will hurt the person or country
whom he targets. Right now, Soros' target is
the good ole USA. The one remaining
superpower that stands in his way.
So how does Soros attack America? By
showing the world how evil they are.
Killing innocent reporters in Iraq,
showing ongoing spy programs that shouldn't
exist, showing how corrupt banks take
our money, etc....

How does Soros get total control?
By making war between countries
to make them financially weak.
Then he can walk in as their savior
and then all hail Soros. How do you
make war? By exposing their true colors.
Their human emotions. Saudi hates Iran!
China hates North Korea, etc...
This is a game to Soros, which up til now
he has played everyone like Nero's fiddle.

The MSM connection

We were all told by the press that each
news network received their wikileak releases
directly from Julian Assange and wikileaks.
This is not the case. This was a lie.

Dean Baquet, the Times Washington bureau chief, told The
Cutline in an email that "it is true we did not get the
documents directly from WikiLeaks. But I can't go beyond that,"
Baquet continued. "I think the other papers will have to
answer questions about their arrangements."

news.yahoo.com...

So if the networks did not get the info
from Julian, then who???

That is the remaining 6 million dollar
question. But I'd put money on the fact
that George Soros would know who that was.

So as you can see, Soros is connected to this
world Psy-Op on every level. Contacts, Money,
and Power. So the truth is revealed as
to who remains behind the curtain.
And the NWO ringleader is revealed.

So what does Julian say about this?

Let's read a leaked e-mail from Julian

To: John Young
From: Wikileaks
Subject: martha stuart pgp
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:20:25 -0500

—–BEGIN PGP MESSAGE—–
Version: None

J. We are going to fxxx them all. Chinese mostly, but not entirely a feint. Invention
abounds. Lies, twists and distorts everywhere needed for protection. Hackers monitor
chinese and other intel as they burrow into their targets, when they pull, so do we.
Inxhaustible supply of material. Near 100,000 documents/emails a day. We’re going to crack the world open and let it flower into something new. If fleecing the CIA will assist us, then fleece we will. We have pullbacks from NED, CFR, Freedomhouse and other CIA teats. We have all of pre 2005 afghanistan. Almost all of india fed. Half
a dozen foreign ministries. Dozens of political parties and consulates, worldbank,
apec, UN sections, trade groups, tibet and fulan dafa associations and… russian
phishing mafia who pull data everywhere. We’re drowing. We don’t even know a tenth
of what we have or who it belongs to. We stopped storing it at 1Tb.

www.daily.pk...


Now, the even bigger question is:
What will be done about it? and
Will Soros be indicted for world
extortion?

And I do not think I have to post
how Soros is connected to Mossad
and the CIA. I will leave a little work
for you guys to join in

Related articles on ATS:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
good job by Dimensional Detective

best wishes and God speed

boon

reply to post by boondock-saint


Good investigative work there boon!
S&F

While there are still unanswered questions, IMO there is substantial cause to
question the motives of the Wikileaks operation.

I use Muckety to see all of the connections to Soros.
www.muckety.com...

And here is Soros with Stevens in the mix.
www.muckety.com... ap

And I could add that the "strangeness" factor hit red yesterday.

reply to post by boondock-saint


The stuff in this thread doesn't look like stuff Israel would want leaked..
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I never understand why anyone thinks people like Soros would be stupid enough to leave a trail as you have listed.
Not very smart, and you link a blog??

Originally posted by backinblack
I never understand why anyone thinks people like Soros would be stupid enough to leave a trail as you have listed.
Not very smart, and you link a blog??

2 things

there is always a trail

the new american is not a blog

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
I never understand why anyone thinks people like Soros would be stupid enough to leave a trail as you have listed.
Not very smart, and you link a blog??

2 things

there is always a trail

the new american is not a blog

No, it's a rant mainly from Glen Beck..
Must be credible cause Beck never lies..

edit: It was the blog that said Julian was paid by Soros, so can you atleast confirm that with a better source??

Brilliantly played boon. I wonder when the agents will start coming in denying everything and pushing distracting fallacies as legitimate arguments? I always knew something was wrong with Wikileaks. What really took the cake for me was when I walked into an English course at my college and the teacher mentioned Wikileaks, along with some of the students. Mind you, this is a small class, and I know for a FACT that me and maybe one other person are the only conspiracy theorists in it. Neither one of us said a word. They heard about it on the news...

When everybody's talking about something, it's probably been seen/heard in mainstream media. When it's in mainstream media, it isn't reliable anymore... they always distort truths to fit agendas.

Hahahahah
Assange doesn't type or even sound like that ( re: leaked email )

Also, it's Inexhaustible, not 'Inxhaustible'.

Originally posted by T0by
Hahahahah
Assange doesn't type or even sound like that ( re: leaked email )

If you noted..That supposed email just said Fom Wikileaks
No nane at all.

I think that was a bit of a stretch from Boon..

Originally posted by backinblack
No, it's a rant mainly from Glen Beck..
Must be credible cause Beck never lies..

so maybe u'd like to explain to this
redneck how Bradley Manning can afford
Soros' attorney???

and how Julian Assange got his start-up
funding from Soros ???

those didn't come from Beck either

Soros is still connected to wiki without
Beck being involved.

So if Assange is the fall guy for Soros, isn't there a possibility that Soros if the fall guy for.....Just sayin'. Soros's name has crossed the media one too many times for my liking to peg him as "The One".
Who does he answer to? Where does the money go from him?

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by T0by
Hahahahah
Assange doesn't type or even sound like that ( re: leaked email )

If you noted..That supposed email just said Fom Wikileaks
No nane at all.

I think that was a bit of a stretch from Boon..

I'm confused since it said

'Let's read a leaked e-mail from Julian'

I suppose it could mean 'from julian' or 'leaked BY julian'.
Um... eh who cares. I just wanted to voice my disapproval.

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
No, it's a rant mainly from Glen Beck..
Must be credible cause Beck never lies..

so maybe u'd like to explain to this
redneck how Bradley Manning can afford
Soros' attorney???

and how Julian Assange got his start-up
funding from Soros ???

those didn't come from Beck either

Soros is still connected to wiki without
Beck being involved.

It's not Soros' attorney..
Where's a credible source (not a blog) to say Soros funded wiki?
And that email is still suss, no mane and sounds a little below Julian's standard of writing..

S&F boon you've outdone yourself.

But that doesn't mean I necesarily agree with you. The truth is none of us know for sure if this man is the real deal. Not you or I, you must keep an open mind.




Not only that but as back in black said, do you really this Soros is this stupid? Yes there is always a trail but not for you and I, this is much bigger than us, and I don't think a blogger(even an exceptinal one such as yourself)can know the truth for sure on this matter. See what I mean?


Edit to add: I fully support a more transparent government no matter how this turns out.

I read your entire post, i must say i am very impressed. Lets hope you are on to something here. I was listening to the Alex Jones show today and despite him having a spokes person for Wikileaks on several times, he (Alex Jones isn't too sure about them (wikileaks) himself. He had Erick AKA MadCow on today and suggested that this Wikileaks has an agenda to bring down Hilary Clinton too.

Personally, i am still in favor of transparency and open source. Good JOB mate.

reply to post by boondock-saint


I think we need to see ALL the leaks..
Not just the ones on MSM before deciding if there is any agenda..

I just wish they would release them all and be done with it..
The insurance file would be good too..

Nice theory, Boon-Dock Saint! Thanks for constructing and sharing.

I will keep my eyes open on this thread, and other developments in the upcoming weeks.

Soros fits in the puzzle, but he seems too obvious to me?; and, as others have mentioned, I would like to see more evidence on the Julian A. email?

I go back and forth with my feelings on Beck; some days he makes complete sense and other days he's a raging lunatic--but then again, aren't we all?

reply to post by boondock-saint


The only thing I can say is...........you're kidding, right? All of the posts you have made supporting him and referencing him, and now all of a sudden, "Oh, wait- he's NWO"?

Why does every single thing have to somehow be manipulated and interpreted as an NWO plot in the end? Yes, I believe there are a group of very powerful people controlling a great many things. But considering a large amount of people here believe almost EVERYTHING is an NWO plot or scheme, then tell me this. If these people/groups are SO powerful, and have been in control for SO long, then how is it that the world has around 7 billion people still instead of the 500 million they supposedly want to reduce it down to?

If they had so much power and control all of this time, they would have already done it. What is more likely is that they are not as powerful as everyone touts them to be, so they use fear to elevate their perceived power among the populace. This strategy has worked for many centuries, but only continues to work due to the perpetuation of the belief that they really do control everything, and you cannot fight the system.

Not everything has to be equated to the NWO, and I feel that far too many people are so overwhelmed with fear of them, that it takes away from the real revolutionaries we have left when they do come around.

Most of the time, boondock, I agree with you. But not this time.

reply to post by boondock-saint


You are aware that The New American is directly related to PNAC I wonder? The same people created both organizations. ?what has the tea party to do with PNAC or the New American which is a neo-conservative rag.

You are looking like a neo-con Tea party infiltrator here. Explain yourself? We in the actual tea party are Libertarian and Jeffersonian not neo-conservative. We are not war party activist. We are not militarist industrialist either. Where are you coming from?

reply to post by Quantum Logic


You know, here's a theory..

If I was Julian and dead against the NWO or whatever you want to call them..

I'd think it hilarious if someone like Soros wanted to give me money..
Why not take it and still do what I want?

Ok, maybe. Follow the money is good investigation, but, if so, I guarantee that Soros isn't alone in the operation and it's highly dubious he's even the ringleader. Things like that don't happen in isolation. They also wouldn't have to pay off CIA or Mossad as compartmentalized elements within each agency were probably in on it anyway. You don't still believe that Oswald was the lone gunman do you?