It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
They have threatened war every fifteen minutes for the past 50 years AND they already have nukes.
Originally posted by HattoriHanzou
reply to post by 1FutureMarine1
North Korea is claiming that the South fired first.
Originally posted by HattoriHanzou
reply to post by 1FutureMarine1
North Korea is claiming that the South fired first.
Originally posted by Secularist
If the Chinese dont deal with this nobody else will, not even America. China protects NK and supports them, so hopefully they do the right thing and tell Kim to stfu.
Originally posted by Adramalech
reply to post by SLAYER69
Yes really - NK have said that SK attacked first - at least most media outlets in the UK and rest of the world are reporting that. Bet FOX (FAUX) NEWS aint though! Lol
Originally posted by Justaposter
Originally posted by HattoriHanzou
reply to post by 1FutureMarine1
North Korea is claiming that the South fired first.
Isn't that what any naughty child would do.. point fingers
Originally posted by Guido the Killer Pimp
This reeks of a major "inciting incident" to me for several reasons, and most of them have nothing to do with Korea at all. Here is my list:
1) The bombing made it's way to the MSM quickly. If this happens all the time, this is the first time that it has been shoved under our noses.
2) 200 shells, and unconfirmed reports of missles...which is unlike the skirmish at the NZ a few months back, where shots were traded but noone was hurt. This was an organized, concise military strike and nothing less.
3) I think N.Korea knows that they would be boned without China...which makes me think that they would never have executed this attack without consenting the Chinese first.
4) The US is heading back into a state of recession.
5) The US Government is seriously lacking in terms of public support
6) The US Government has wasted tens of thousands of troops in the middle east in a fruitless and pointless war, and continue to leave tens of thousands of more in harms way.
7) In order to be "top dawg", China needs to cripple the USA.
In my opinion, from China's perspective the States are ripe for the crippling. Economically, they are in serious jeopardy of falling back into a recession (or even a depression), their military forces have been weakened by the war in the Middle East, their own populace believes the Government to be responsible for many of the current issues of today (such as 9/11)...and China holds a MAJOR ace in the hole, which is the second largest ammount of US public debt. All they would need to do is call it in, and the States would be economically devestated. So why haven't they, you ask?
They need to paint the States as an aggressor. If they called in the debt, and the States went to war, they would find America once again united as a nation. This is a game of chess...China needs the States to attack North Korea, so it appears as though China is simply coming to the aide of an ally. People in the US would then be more ready to blame their Government (once again) for getting involved in the business of some Island in the Pacific with no real value to US interests.
Right now, China needs only to pull the trigger and the States would be in for a reall sh!t kicking...this is an act of war, make no mistake. And if the chips fall right, this is an act of war that is going to pull the entire world in. Don't think "nuclear devestation" right off the bat...we could still have a war with limited (or no) Nuclear action. That would only come at the end, when one side has gone the way of Hitler, and has their back up against the wall. And believe me...if Hitler had the capability to take us all with him at the end, he would have....that's what scares me.
GtkP
Originally posted by Thepreye
reply to post by HattoriHanzou
Ultra useful post, all of the sources listed are so impeccable that even the hawkiest of hawks couldn't object and should be glad of the opportunity to learn.
edit on 23-11-2010 by Thepreye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HattoriHanzou
Originally posted by clay2 baraka
Originally posted by HattoriHanzou
Sure, you can "deal with" NK but you're going to have to trade Seoul and possibly Tokyo to do it
Let me clarify this statement:
North Korea will likely wipe Seoul, South Korea and several Japanese cities off the map if we "just nuke em all." Women, children... Mostly civilians. The "nuke em all" statement is a real easy macho attitude to have, while you are thousands of miles away sitting on your fat ass eating nachos and playing Call of Duty with your family safely down the street. .
Grow up. :flameedit on 11/23/2010 by clay2 baraka because: composition
If you were responding to me, and telling me to "grow up" I think you need to re-read what I said, and be a little more polite in the future.
You don't know a thing about me.
Originally posted by Adramalech
Originally posted by Justaposter
Originally posted by HattoriHanzou
reply to post by 1FutureMarine1
North Korea is claiming that the South fired first.
Isn't that what any naughty child would do.. point fingers
Yes. They'd also do it if it were true. But all those NKs are liars aren't they, so no need to even doubt that they are lying! LOL