Cyber Security FALSE FLAG In effect NOW

Problem, Reaction, Solution.....

Thanks to the internet, tricks like "FALSE FLAG ATTACKS", are being exposed everyday. People are waking up to how the real political power structure operates. You have to "Control" the flow of information. So TPTB need legislation that helps them reach that goal.

www.youtube.com...

www.reuters.com...

For the past year they've been trying to pass the "Cyber Security Bill". Selling it by suggesting that China or whoever could hack our cell phones, power grids etc. and we need to protect ourselves from it. However thanks to the internet exposing what was really in the bill the people stood up against it. So those in Congress are afraid to pass it because they dont want to upset their voters. How can you solve this problem and pass the damn bill before the end of the year!?!

You create a Cyber FALSE FLAG Attack. You start with the threat of hacking nukes....

www.youtube.com...

You make it seem like something went wrong with a missle launch...!!

www.cbsnews.com...

See now they have their problem. Now those who may not have voted for it are watching the DoD and Navy scramble for lies to explain an obvious breach of security or accident and they say to themselves....maybe I should vote for this. Fox News, CNN, play their part in hyping the confusion so even the public would support it if it were explained to them to bring public pressure for a vote on passing the bill.

I believe, especially for those who enjoy websites like this, that just incase I'm right that we on a local level help remind those who pass legislation to NOT VOTE for the passage of this Cyber Take Over from the Federal Government!

But hey maybe Im wrong.....but what if I'm right?

I think your thinking is interesting, and could be right. It seems to me there is something very suspicious about the Pentagon's response to this.

A suggestion, and no offence meant. There seems to be an increasing number of thread titles these days which seek to sensationalise and scare and which aren't accurate. One question mark at the end of your title would have made it more honest. In a world where we are all struggling to make sense of a morass of lies and false info, it would be so nice if on here at least we tried to spare people more of the same.

reply to post by wcitizen


Note taken, this was my first attempt at a thred. However I worded it the way I did to encourage those out there regardless of a false cyber attack, to go ahead and remind their local politicans to not support the cyber security bill which they will be voting on this year. Because even if I'm wrong about everything happening being pressure for that legislation there isn't any harm in going ahead in reminding them that we want their hands off the internet. That was the thought behind my statement at the end. But thanks for the heads up I'll bear in mind next time not to make it sound sensationlized.

Originally posted by InfowarriorCarson
reply to post by wcitizen

 

Note taken, this was my first attempt at a thred. However I worded it the way I did to encourage those out there regardless of a false cyber attack, to go ahead and remind their local politicans to not support the cyber security bill which they will be voting on this year. Because even if I'm wrong about everything happening being pressure for that legislation there isn't any harm in going ahead in reminding them that we want their hands off the internet. That was the thought behind my statement at the end. But thanks for the heads up I'll bear in mind next time not to make it sound sensationlized.

I am in total agreement with you, but I suspect they have their sights firmly set on the internet - too much truth is available via the web.! I mean, even though they've got almost total control of the MSM, people are becoming informed more and more thanks to the internet. But we can put up a fight!

reply to post by InfowarriorCarson


With all the crazy stuff on the internet lately this idea did indeed come to mind. What can I do to prevent this? is it too late?

Hardly anyone at my school even knows about the Cyber Security Bill....all they care about is booze and sex.

I think this is a very interesting and valid theory. Since we are potentially exposing false flags everyday, they need to make sure they can control the flow in such a way so that we don't expose false flags and other gov wrongdoing. So basically, they would initiate a false flag to cover up other false flags. I am probably not making sense but I definitely understand the OP and I think the theory just makes the perfect amount of sense. For example, there was that Simpson's thing a bit ago... I mean, yeah, it was likely nothing, but if it WAS something, TPTB could obviously not do whatever they had been planning since we noticed, so the like 1% chance that the Simpson's cartoon prophecied a nuclear false flag is still enough that if something IS real, TPTB will definitely not be able to do what they want to do since we notice. Anyways. Thanks for the thread. Sorry for the incoherency. Haha.

reply to post by InfowarriorCarson


Interesting indeed. One thing that I have noticed in years of working in electronics
is that if someone really wants in, it is extremely hard to stop them from hacking
in. Short of making everything fiber obtics, (even then, switches can be read) there
is almost no real IT security. Corporations spend alot of money securing their IT
infrastructures only to have a teenage hacker with a laptop zip through with ease.
(they usually end up hiring them afterwards or they go to jail).

Imagine Cyberwarfare! It will take ALOT more money and redesigning of IT networks
to improve security just in the short term. I think the U.S. should concentrate on improving
National Security related infrastructure and defense related buildings and objects. I'm worried
about security of the smart grid that has been talked about lately.

en.wikipedia.org...

Without taking any sides and being totally neutral about this particular thread i would say that cyber attacks are very real and do happen every day, every minute of the day and every second that i am currently typing. So it is all a matter of what and how wishes to describe cyber attack.

A quick look at the intrusion methods used on either web sites, banks, military input valve centers etc. That being said, what everyone should focus on is the level of acceptance in incorporating your smart phones into your day to day living. That is the key, that is were everyone is vulnerable, perhaps not know, but in due time, you too will have a smart phone that will access all your daily routines.

Some might be saying, yeah sure, i dont have a cell phone, nor do i intend to own one, but the fact is that everything is gearing up to be connected online with the catch phrase " its easier,faster,cheaper" ....well along those lines anyway. So in reality, unless you live in the mountains and have no need for any service that your nation provides you with, then you have no need to be online. Slowly but surely everyone is to be connected, only a minority will remain off the grid (so to speak).

As a last word, i would recommend everyone within here to polish their knowledge on encryption, on and that does not mean emailing the key to a friend. When you want someone to have your encryption key, you must do it in physical form or through a sync random generator process.

my humble 0.001 cent worth of opinion.

reply to post by tristar


Yeah I totally agree, people should study encryption more often than they do at present.

Cell phone hacking has become totally doable now, with a few terabytes of rainbow tables, the Berlin A5/1 rainbow table set, 3GB of RAM, nVidia/ATI HD GFX card, $1,500 DIY base station and a laptop running nearly any Linux distro; you can hijack an area of 150m in range and become a man in the middle for all cell phones in that area. You can view SMS messages and listen into phone calls. GSM is dead now that the Kraken has been released.

Cyber warfare happens every second, every day. The Peoples Liberation Army have chicken coops of hackers attacking European, American and every other countries servers, that is; military and government.

Its not as easy as setting the entire Asian network to a blacklist as TOR, proxies, tunnels and zombie PC's are easily available and very efficient to use against a block.

IF TPTB ever took the Internet down, there would be billions of people rioting and protesting in the streets. I think when TPTB decide to create a false flag operation to censor or take down the Internet; it will be so clever that most of the people in the world will actually make it happen and they will want it to happen.

Well with the recent 'missile' hype all over the news and the internet something is a foot.

You have retired military generals and secretary of defense saying 1oo% missile and even though one says 'speculation' the word 'missile' rules the day

The official response 4 days later is not satisfying anyone really and the media is still pushing the hype. Since they admit they are seeing record interest in this topic, considering we are in a heightened state of alert... the fact that Pentagon and NORAD are literally laughing at all the fuss is just wrong on so many counts.

Chinese sneaking into a spot just off LA within site of the 'secret' US NAVY launch site at San Nicolas Island? A foreign power launching a missile from a sub of our busiest shore? A US military test firing that is secret in full view of LA? Russian company Energia bought up controlling interest in the Boeing/Energia Sea Launch platform that has it's home port in Long Island on the US NAVY base?

Seriously... there is something else going on her. Its been 4days with this missile hype. If we can't solve this one what the hell will we do when the real 'false flag invasion' that Wernher von Braun told us about starts? We are SCREWED

And the 'loss' of those nukes a few days ago..

WHY would they even TELL US they lost control? No one would have known about it if they didn't announce it. So why scare the public by telling us?

Sure we all believe they are incompetent fools... but do they really need to prove it?

I think I will check my storehouse of supplies today... make sure I am not missing essentials and cut some more firewood

Just in case

Originally posted by zorgon
The official response 4 days later is not satisfying anyone really and the media is still pushing the hype. Since they admit they are seeing record interest in this topic, considering we are in a heightened state of alert... the fact that Pentagon and NORAD are literally laughing at all the fuss is just wrong on so many counts.

Chinese sneaking into a spot just off LA within site of the 'secret' US NAVY launch site at San Nicolas Island? A foreign power launching a missile from a sub of our busiest shore? A US military test firing that is secret in full view of LA? Russian company Energia bought up controlling interest in the Boeing/Energia Sea Launch platform that has it's home port in Long Island on the US NAVY base?

Seriously... there is something else going on her. Its been 4days with this missile hype. If we can't solve this one what the hell will we do when the real 'false flag invasion' that Wernher von Braun told us about starts? We are SCREWED

As you are aware and most of those who actually are familiar with how the seabed is cross referenced, its highly unlikely a foreign vessel of any type entered the launch zone. So that points to two things, one being that there is a vessel that has entered and fired with an ability that is unknown which i find highly unlikely as the amount of scrambled units would seem like its Christmas so it points to the obvious, it was a test.

reply to post by the_denv


Scenario, physical hit on strategic points that disrupt connections and as obvious enough the tree in the forest is over run by bacteria spreading without barriers until detected.

Possible suggestion, isolate all availability to a point were pivots are made inaccessible for temp period of time, simultaneously comforting the public that its a routine upgrade to the existing network.

Originally posted by Tulkor
Hardly anyone at my school even knows about the Cyber Security Bill....all they care about is booze and sex.

Indeed, humans are so predictable, well when one decides to focus on a particular social mind thought pattern.

reply to post by tristar


An EMP being detonated at the main hubs of the Internet and a release of a worm with embedded virus?

Care to elaborate mate, that was very cryptic what you just said lol

reply to post by the_denv


Cryptic, i wouldn't call that cryptic but rather a scenario.

Can i elaborate, or should i elaborate, sure i could, but i seen no reason why i should, as its a scenario not an intention.