It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

page: 124
354
<< 121  122  123    125  126  127 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:03 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Fair enough, I made a mistake on which ship it was but the EMP portion is true to my understanding. And not from the source posted.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:03 PM
link   
form of the contrail & incandescent point in front of say for missile



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower

Tell me folks, if YOU were in command what would YOU do if someone launched something on your shore?

Always remember that the razor is the most obvious explanation.


THANKYOU !

I shave with Occam's razor every morning - and the simplest answer is usually the right one,

but no simpler.

We await the news stories from the Carnival passengers, forthcoming soon, which may

be illuminating.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I am not going to repost it if you don't want to read it correctly that's your problem and please don't overstate and claim that FFA had planes in the area.


I am sure NORAD And FFA are both smart but they had no evidence of a plane in the area at time of the contrail.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:04 PM
link   
Here's Michio Kaku and some other guy giving their opinions. A lot of people in the comments seem to think they are lying. O.o



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:04 PM
link   
I re-heard the chinese theory on the michael savage radio show the savage nation he is suggesting if it wasn't a plane it could of been the chinese sneaking up on us in a sub shooting off a missile to show us whos boss... My thinking is why would china risk all that money we owe them, their nations own security, and all that money we are making them just to prove they could get that close to our shores and set off a missile? Can china launch a missile attack from china and hit us without getting to the shores?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter



what looks like a red glow is more than likely the sun reflecting off the aircraft.


Sorry but i am going to respond to your post because i find ridiculous you only made it up to back up your plane theory.
edit on 10-11-2010 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)


You think what you want to think me laddo, there plenty of videos and pictures out there of sunlight reflecting off aircraft, [sarcasm mode] you see the thing about the sun right, is that its usually bright light, and the thing about aircraft is right, they are usually bright white, and when mr sunlight hits mr plane he goes all reflecty!
[/sarcasm mode]
edit on 10/11/10 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Stewie
 

Apparently not.

Gee whiz. Here's the previous one.
www.nga.mil...

And one from August.
www.nga.mil...

Oh...look. Last year.
www.nga.mil...


Seems it's a pretty much permanent notice for possible missile operations. Not surprising since it is a known target and test firing range.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 

No, you won't repost it will you. Because you never did post it. Because the FAA never said there were no planes in the area.

Remember, you accused me of lying?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Originally posted by DangerDeath
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


This footage is a loop from the original video, made by a member of ATS.
It is about the light that appears on the plane - red and green position lights, or reflection from the sun, which I doubt since at this moment plane is in shade?



typical nonsense
watch it again
First you cant be sure its a plane

www.youtube.com...

watch it again

From what i have seen it has only a green flashing color and tell me this honestly doesnt look like the back of the engine is on fire? since can normal planes do that?


an a optical illusion? lol sorry i am not buying it.

I am going to say to say the plane theory was a cover for whatever the military lunched, its normal for the pentagon to cover it up i am not surprised alot of you are buying the plane theory.


Despite the good work mapping out the local inbound/ outbound heavies on the flightaware tracker,

did anyone conclude WHICH plane that was in the same video flying by?

Wouldn't any passengers on that plane be commenting on the smoke trail by now?

So, was it a military or commercial flight - or was it a UFO that someone here alluded to (doubt)?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   

edit on 11/10/2010 by drphilxr because: double post -???



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   
A foreign power launched a missile within our boundary waters to show us they had the ability.

PERIOD.

You can twist it, you can smokescreen it, you can do whatever you want.

The FACT remains the same, a missile with ballistic trajectory was launched within our boundary waters.

Oh well, the sheep will bleet all the way home.

Sorry to tell you this folks, ballistic missiles are NOT that hard to make. My neighbors kid launches 5 mile rockets all the time. He has one that is about 10' high. Whoopdy doo.

Get over it. This was a message. If you do not understand it, there are those that do.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Stewie
 

It was not a missile.
It was a passenger jet. US Air flight 808.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aisling
Why didn't they show this on CNN or FOX? Rather than continue reporting that the Pentagon doesn't know what it is?


Because it draws in viewers to keep a good story going...

But I think the News media is over doing it. I don't think they realise how this is effecting people..

or do they?




posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:12 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:13 PM
link   
reply to post by windwaker
 


I HEARD IT WAS EMP MISSILE THAT DISABLED THE CRUIISE SHIP THAT THEY ARE TUGGING NOW TO LAND...KNOCK OUT ALL POWER BUT THE NEWS SAID THERE WAS A FIRE ON THE SHIP THAT KNOCKED OUT POWER..GO TO THE KREMLIN NEWS



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:13 PM
link   
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
 

more possible, that was accidental launch of US missile



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Bull smidt. I have looked at all the vids, all the photos, that was not a persistent contrail. You can attempt to say it was but I say BULL smidt.

It was a ballistic missile of some sort. It could of been a private launch. I have seen my neighbor light his off. He calls up the local tower to get clearance. That was not and could not have been a persistent contrail, no matter how much you want to stretch the imagination.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 07:13 PM
link   
Some of us know what really happened,,,,,,

Steve Martin summed it up best on SNL.

"Cause the public has a short memory. Let me give you a little test, okay? This is my thesis -- the public has a short memory and, like-- How many people remember, a couple of years ago, when the Earth blew up? How many people? See? So few people remember. And you would think that something like that, people would remember. But NOOO! You don't remember that? The Earth blew up and was completely destroyed? And we escaped to this planet on the giant Space Ark? Where have you people been? And the government decided not to tell the stupider people 'cause they thought that it might affect-- [dawning realization, looks around] Ohhhh! Okay! Uh, let's move on"!



new topics

top topics



 
354
<< 121  122  123    125  126  127 >>

log in

join